[03:56] <pabs3> any bug supervisors around?
[04:03] <persia> pabs3: Maybe?  I'm not precisely sure what "bug supervisor" means.  What do you seek to have done?
[04:04] <pabs3> I would like to propose #1061244 for fixing in precise. according to the SRU page, I need a bug supervisor to target the bug to precise and after that I need to subscribe ubuntu-sru and ubuntu-sponsors
[04:04] <pabs3> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[04:04] <persia> bug #1061244
[04:04] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1061244 in samba (Ubuntu Precise) "Fix net rpc share allowedusers to work with 2008r2" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1061244
[04:05] <persia> Ah, seems I can't do that for that package.  I suspect you need someone with upload rights to samba.
[04:07] <persia> Ah, I see why I can't.  Someone already did.
[04:08] <pabs3> oh, so just subscribe -sru/-sponsors?
[04:08] <persia> Yes.  You may also want to assign yourself the Precise task, so folk know you're acting as contact point for the SRU
[04:09] <pabs3> hm, ok
[04:10] <persia> Alternately, convince olly to do so (as he's the apparent uploader in the attached diff)
[04:13] <pabs3> he has delegated this task to me
[04:13] <persia> In that case, you're the assignee
[04:13] <pabs3> all done now I think
[04:14] <micahg> I can have a look at the diff sometime tomorrow when I pilot
[04:14] <pabs3> great, thanks
[04:15] <persia> From a bug-format perspective, it looks fine to me.  I can't sponsor samba though.
[07:55] <a7x1> would someone please target regression-proposed bug #1091976 to precise?
[07:55] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1091976 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) ""fix" uploaded to precise-proposed for a bug that doesn't exist" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1091976
[07:56] <micahg> why is this a regression?
[07:57] <a7x1> i don't know if anything broke with the change, but fixing something that isn't a problem can't be good
[07:58] <micahg> idk if you need a new bug, see what happens on the bug you filed
[07:58] <micahg> sorry, on the SRU bug
[07:59] <a7x1> ok, i'll wait.  i was just following procedure on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification
[07:59] <a7x1> should i close this new bug or just let it sit?
[08:00] <micahg> let it sit
[08:00] <a7x1> ok.  thanks!
[08:01] <a7x1> while i have your attention, what do you think about targeting bug #1043769 to quantal?
[08:01] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1043769 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "Monitor image not clickable in display settings after the first time" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1043769
[08:06] <micahg> sorry, in the middle of a few things right now
[08:11] <a7x1> no problem; it's low priority and i'm heading to bed now anyway
[08:11] <a7x1> thanks for your help!
[16:02] <trijntje> Hi all, I've reported a bug and fixed it, but there has been no activity since. Is there something more I should do?
[16:02] <trijntje> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu/+bug/1085379?comments=all
[16:02] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1085379 in Package Descriptions for Ubuntu "ddtp templates should be sorted by popularity" [Undecided,New]
[16:02]  * TheLordOfTime glances
[16:02] <TheLordOfTime> trijntje, was the fix included in Ubuntu yet?
[16:02] <TheLordOfTime> or not :p
[16:03] <TheLordOfTime> mvo, ping.
[16:03] <mvo> TheLordOfTime: pong
[16:03] <TheLordOfTime> mvo, read up and see trijntje's stuff.
[16:03] <TheLordOfTime> you're listed as the maintainer for the project that bug's filed against.
[16:04] <TheLordOfTime> (or at least related to that as the project in question is part of the project you are the maintainer of, Package Descriptions)
[16:04] <trijntje> TheLordOfTime: no, I dont think the fix was accepted yet
[16:04] <TheLordOfTime> trijntje, i think mvo might know more than bugsquad, hence the ping to them.
[16:05]  * TheLordOfTime returns to attempting to iron out a security bug in znc on hardy
[16:05] <trijntje> TheLordOfTime: ok, thanks for the pointer!
[16:05] <mvo> trijntje: hey! sorry, I did not notice that branch, great that you have it. one thing though, this pot file is automatically geneated by the "apt-ddtp-tools" so ideally we should make the script part of those tools and the automation behind it
[16:06] <mvo> trijntje: https://code.launchpad.net/apt-ddtp-tools
[16:06] <TheLordOfTime> trijntje, as an FYI, bugsquad handles the ubuntu bugs usually, we don't usually touch unrelated projects (but we know who to poke/stab about them, and how to find those people!)
[16:06] <TheLordOfTime> mvo, sorry for the random ping there ;)
[16:06] <TheLordOfTime> s/unrelated/non-ubuntu-namespaced/
[16:06] <mvo> TheLordOfTime: no worries, always welcome when there is a branch/patch :)
[16:07] <TheLordOfTime> mvo, you should subscribe to all bugs for your projects :P
[16:07] <mvo> *cough*
[16:07]  * TheLordOfTime is subscribed to 5 packages, and 3 projects.  don't ask why.
[16:07] <TheLordOfTime> ... aw crap, not ANOTHER bug on that one... how many times am i going to have to mark duplicate bugs :/
[16:08]  * TheLordOfTime shifts attention to one of the projects he is subscribed to
[16:09] <trijntje> mvo: I'll have a look at apt-ddtp-tools. The script for sorting it is pretty heavy though, since it pulls in a bunch of stuf from the software center branch to figure out which packages show up there
[16:10] <mvo> trijntje: I see, can you point me to the script? mabe we can work out a more lightweight way?
[16:10] <trijntje> mvo: lp:~redmar/+junk/ddtp_popsort
[16:11] <trijntje> its my first bit of code for ubuntu, so it could be pretty bad ;)
[16:11] <mvo> trijntje: no worries :)
[16:11]  * TheLordOfTime chuckles.
[16:12] <TheLordOfTime> sorry, can't help it, i tend to always chuckle when someone says that
[16:12]  * TheLordOfTime has seen some pretty bad code in the past, and no "new ubuntu coder"'s code has compared to that evil code he's seen in the past.
[16:13] <mvo> trijntje: from a quick glance, get_sc_packages.sh could apt-get source app-install-data-ubuntu, that would avoid getting the entire history (or bzr co --lightweight)
[16:13] <mvo> trijntje: and what TheLordOfTime said :) code that is not in the open is usally far worse, I'm sure your stuff is just fine :)
[16:14] <trijntje> TheLordOfTime: thanks ;) I've tried not to cut any corners, as I knew other people might have to use it
[16:15] <TheLordOfTime> mvo, the code i was talking about was a php5 patch xD
[16:16] <TheLordOfTime> but EVERYONE knows that php5's code is evil... OH CRAP DID I SAY THAT IN A LOGGED CHANNEL?!?!? ... crap.
[16:21] <mvo> :P
[16:21] <trijntje> mvo: that might work, though I'd have to check if all packages (not just main) are in app-install-data-ubuntu
[16:24] <mvo> trijntje: should be, the universe ones will have a small annotation X-AppInstall-Component=universe iirc
[16:26] <trijntje> mvo: btw, how does apt-ddtp-tools work? If it just merges the descriptions from somewhere else into the existing pot file it should keep the order the same, so we'd only have to sort it once
[16:28] <trijntje> app-install-data-ubuntu does indeed contain all packages, including those from universe
[16:42] <mvo> trijntje: it builds the pot file from the Packages file - and that changes everytime a new package is added (which will result in a new description). so I think we need to re-sort everytime the Packages file(s) are parsed
[16:42] <mvo> trijntje: I will soon go for dinner, but we can talk some more when I'm back or tomorrow if you want
[16:44] <trijntje> mvo: sure, I'll try and see if I can figure what apt-ddtp-tools does in the meantime
[16:44] <mvo> trijntje: awsome, let me know if/when I can help!
[16:45] <trijntje> I'll speak you tomorrow then, enjoy your dinner!
[19:49] <trijntje> Hi all, i've reported this bug, but it hasn't had a lot of activity. Can somebody take a look and tell me what would be needed to get things moving?
[19:49] <trijntje> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-defaults-builder/+bug/1075876
[19:49] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1075876 in ubuntu-defaults-builder (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-defaults-builder: only quantal 64bit does not build" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[19:50] <trijntje> I'm willing to try to fix it myself if I can, but I have no clue where to start
[19:53] <TheLordOfTime> trijntje, i've nominated it for quantal, since its apparently a quantal-only bug.
[19:53] <TheLordOfTime> lemme ping someone who's more godly to actually accept the "nomination" for quantal.
[19:53]  * TheLordOfTime stabs xnox
[19:54] <TheLordOfTime> s/stabs/pokes/
[19:54] <hggdh> heh, better
[19:54] <TheLordOfTime> or anyone else with more godly bug powers than I :P
[19:54] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, if you can approve the nomination for quantal on that, feel free (apparently it doesn't happen in Raring?)
[19:54] <hggdh> already looking at it
[19:54]  * TheLordOfTime returns to trying to patch php5, and work through FTBFS stuff.
[19:57]  * TheLordOfTime kicks sbuild
[19:57] <TheLordOfTime> anyways...
[19:57]  * TheLordOfTime returns to lurkmode
[19:58] <trijntje> TheLordOfTime: Thanks! Hopefully that will lure in someone who will fix it for me ;)
[19:58] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, i think that same bug needs "Invalid" or "Fix Released" or whatever it is for Raring...
[19:58]  * TheLordOfTime just timed out to LP, including from his server, so... he can't do much about that.
[19:59] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime: approved. It seems 'df' gets lost
[20:04] <hggdh> TheLordOfTime, trijntje: I am only not sure if this is directly related to ubuntu-defaults-builder
[20:04] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, nor am I, its not in my package specializations.
[20:04] <TheLordOfTime> hggdh, which is why the only thing I did was nominate for Q
[20:07] <trijntje> hggdh: I don't think so either
[20:07] <trijntje> at first I thougt it was a general problem with the build, but then it would surely have been fixed already
[20:10] <jibel> df warning is just noise and not fatal, I'd rather blame grube-probe failure
[20:10] <jibel> /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for / (is /dev mounted?).
[20:11] <hggdh> ah, had not seen it
[20:47] <trijntje> jibel: I'll try and add a succesfull log to the bug as well, for comparison. I'm pretty sure I also see the df errors with succesfull builds
[20:48] <trijntje> I've got to go now, thanks for taking a look all!