infinity | herton: So, is there a reason the bot hasn't decided that 1090123 is fit for release? | 00:33 |
---|---|---|
infinity | henrix_: ^ | 00:33 |
* infinity suspects it may relate to verification tasks, and gives up and just releases it. | 00:36 | |
herton | infinity, sorry, it's a bug I introduced in the bot today, fixed | 01:32 |
=== chiluk is now known as chiluk_away | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
* apw yawns widly | 10:19 | |
bambee | Hi, nvidia-current does not build with linux-image 3.5.21-generic on precise (there is a 3.5 kernel packaged on precise) | 12:42 |
xnox | replied to above ^ in #ubuntu-devel. | 12:55 |
xnox | bambee: don't cross-post same message to multiple channels. | 12:55 |
bambee | xnox: I just realized that this message was for the kernel team and not for the whole #ubuntu-devel channel | 12:57 |
xnox | bambee: meh. it's an issue between #ubuntu-x package and #ubuntu-kernel package, therefore #ubuntu-devel is the common ground =)))) | 13:01 |
bambee | okay, noted | 13:05 |
* henrix -> lunch | 13:32 | |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== chiluk_away is now known as chiluk | ||
=== chiluk is now known as chiluk_away | ||
=== chiluk_away is now known as chiluk | ||
apw | break-fix: 639b321b4d8f4e412bfbb2a4a19bfebc1e68ace4 local-2012-2372 | 14:34 |
apw | henrix, for the CVE where we only have a 'local' fix, i think using the title makes most sense as it will correctly catch the later application of the real fix | 15:08 |
henrix | apw: ok, cool. but for 2012-5532 i guess it makes sense to use the sha1s, right? | 15:09 |
henrix | apw: i'm about to commit the linux-overlay file | 15:09 |
henrix | apw: ok, pushed the changes for linux-overlay | 15:12 |
* henrix -> errand. back in 15mins | 15:13 | |
apw | henrix, yeah i think so | 15:14 |
henrix | apw: about the btrfs hash collision: looks like the guy that found the issue agrees with you | 15:35 |
henrix | apw: "Finally, the first described attack, i.e., make impossible the creation of a given file within a shared directory, keeps still valid." | 15:35 |
apw | yeah | 15:35 |
apw | henrix, ok that seems to have worked finally | 15:56 |
henrix | apw: ah, cool! thanks for you help figuring this out | 15:56 |
=== amitk is now known as amitk-afk | ||
infinity | hggdh: Did you have plans to polish off regression-testing on 1087212 before the holidays, so the kernel SRU workflow can start with a clean slate in January? :) | 16:50 |
infinity | hggdh: (That's the only outstanding SRU left, though no pressure if you can't get to it, or you're already on a beach somewhere ignoring me) | 16:51 |
hggdh | infinity: looking it up | 17:12 |
hggdh | infinity: given it is already in -proposed, I am running it now | 17:13 |
hggdh | infinity: we usually do not look at the regression-testing bugs until they reach confirmed for us. So, as a rule of thumb, if you need one done before confirmed status, please ping me | 17:15 |
* hggdh wishes there were beached in the Dallas area | 17:19 | |
hggdh | beaches | 17:19 |
hggdh | well, there are lakes, and there is the mud/dirt/whatever at the water front. But that is not really a beach | 17:19 |
infinity | hggdh: Ahh, yeah, true that it wasn't marked confirmed because it's still in the verification stage, but I figured a bit of parallelisation here wouldn't hurt. :) | 17:25 |
hggdh | infinity: no problems for me :-) | 17:26 |
=== chiluk is now known as chiluk_away | ||
* apw looks outside, time to get out of this room | 18:19 | |
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
slangasek | anyone around who could talk to me about bug #1040557? | 19:03 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1040557 in Ubuntu CD Images "UEFI boot live-usb bricks SAMSUNG 530U3C,np700z5c laptop" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1040557 | 19:03 |
slangasek | In talking with Samsung, it seems likely that the samsung-laptop module is triggering this; would it be possible to disable the samsung-laptop module only on systems booted with EFI? | 19:04 |
=== chiluk_away is now known as chiluk | ||
jsalisbury | apw, cking If you have a chance, can you review comment #69 in bug 1040557 ? | 19:29 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1040557 in Ubuntu CD Images "UEFI boot live-usb bricks SAMSUNG 530U3C,np700z5c laptop" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1040557 | 19:29 |
bullgard4_ | /sys/devices/'LINKSYSTM:00/ exists. '~$ rgrep 'LINKSYSTM' /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32/Documentation/ 2>/dev/null' does not produce any output. How is 'LINKSYSTM' defined? | 19:46 |
bullgard4_ | s/LINKSYSTM/LNXSYSTM/ | 19:48 |
hggdh | infinity: done, I guess now it is just waiting for Ike to finish | 20:47 |
infinity | hggdh: Thanks. :) | 20:49 |
achiang | jsalisbury: ping, still around? | 23:29 |
jsalisbury | achiang, yes | 23:29 |
achiang | jsalisbury: hey, could you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-nexus7/+bug/1088424 ? sounds like something you could poke at... or maybe actually it should be ogasawara | 23:30 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1088424 in linux-nexus7 (Ubuntu) "alsa midi sequencer not available on nexus 7" [Wishlist,Incomplete] | 23:30 |
jsalisbury | achiang, sure I'll take a look. ogasawara is out until the new year | 23:30 |
achiang | jsalisbury: ah, ok. the real question is, did the audit of ensure the n7 Kconfig matches up with ubuntu's Kconfig ever happen. and if not, how can we make it happen? :) | 23:31 |
jsalisbury | achiang, that I don't know off hand. Maybe apw can answer that. I believe he is in tomorrow. | 23:32 |
achiang | or vanhoof ^^ | 23:32 |
jsalisbury | achiang, I'll keep on top of it and ping folks tomorrow when they get in | 23:35 |
achiang | jsalisbury: works for me, thanks! | 23:36 |
jsalisbury | achiang, np | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!