/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/12/19/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== bregma is now known as bregma|away
dholbachgood morning08:07
micahgachiang: this was a little off topic for #launchpad, so I moved here, anyways, you can get sponsored uploads here: http://ubuntu-dev.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi08:09
achiangmicahg: whizbang. thanks08:11
achiangand... bed time. :)08:11
micahgfor me as well08:11
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio__
=== Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== bregma|away is now known as bregma
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_
alo21hi all... I am merging gnome-photo-printer, and as in the changelog, the bug #662978 has been closed. But when I downloaded the package, I can still see that bug15:13
ubottubug 662978 in compiz (Ubuntu) "Feature Request: Make "Place Windows" plugin functionality available through the window title context menu" [Low,Expired] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66297815:13
alo21sorry the bug is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=66297815:14
ubottuDebian bug 662978 in gnome-photo-printer "gnome-photo-printer: Small issues with gnome-photo-printer.desktop" [Minor,Open]15:14
alo21can I fix the bug while the merging?15:14
TheLordOfTimealo21, actually, the bug's expired.15:17
TheLordOfTimeoh, the debian bug is open.15:17
* TheLordOfTime leaves this be and waits for MOTUs15:18
TheLordOfTimespeaking of MOTUs, got an unrelated question for them, but it can wait :P15:19
alo21hmm.. ok. thanks for your support15:20
Adri2000alo21: yes you can. then send your fixes to the debian maintainer / bug report15:21
Adri2000from what I can see, the only .desktop thing not fixed in -1.2 is that the Icon line should not contain the file extension15:23
alo21Adri2000, yes... so I can merge the package with my edited .desktop file, and then send the patch in debian.15:25
alo21Adri2000, why the bug is in the changelog?15:26
Adri2000the changelog says "adresses: 662978" which probably explains why the bug wasn't automatically closed. maybe the uploader did that because he didn't fix the bug completely. so the real question is why he didn't fix it completely :)15:29
alo21Adri2000, have I put in the changelog that I 'really fixed the bug'?15:31
alo21Close: #66297815:32
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
TheLordOfTimeI've seen it written as "Closes: #number"15:32
TheLordOfTimenot sure how strict their BTS is on looking for "Closes:"15:32
Adri2000I'm not sure it works without the 's' indeed. anyway that is only for debian so it won't have any impact for an ubuntu upload15:33
TheLordOfTimemhm.15:34
Adri2000the syntax for closing a bug in ubuntu is "LP: #nnnnnn"15:34
TheLordOfTimeindeed.15:34
alo21Adri2000, a part 's', which I will include. Have I to say the fix explicitly ?15:35
Adri2000alo21: for your ubuntu upload you can write "fixed this and this in the desktop file" and you may indeed mention the debian bug report (using the Closes: syntax or not won't change anything here).15:37
Adri2000then when you forward your fixes to debian, if you provide a complete debdiff for a debian upload (instead of just the patch corresping to your fixes), you will have to use the correct syntax to close the bug15:38
Adri2000corresponding*15:38
alo21ok15:39
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw
psusisomeone tell me I'm not losing my mind... dpkg --compare-versions '2 > 1' complains that --compare-versiosn needs 3 arguments... umm... I'm giving it 3...15:52
psusiohh... nevermind.. damnit... it's *also* interpreting the quotes...15:53
micahgpsusi: that's one argument15:58
psusiyea, had to escape rather than quote to get through the shell15:58
psusidid I see somewhere that this last dev cycle incoming packages started automatically being sent to -proposed?16:15
psusidoes that mean they are built against other packages in -proposed? or are they still built against what's in the release pocket?16:16
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw
=== Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_
=== Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw
jtaylorif I backport a new soversion library and then a rdep of it19:28
jtaylorwill the rdep backport build against the library backport ?19:29
jtaylorpsusi: they are built against proposed19:31
psusiwon't that lead to breakage if the app is moved to the release pocket but not the lib it was built against?19:32
jtaylorif so then there should be versioned depends19:32
psusiwell yea,  but that's what I'm talking about... it will depend on the newer version of the lib and thus, won't be installable19:33
Laneyjtaylor: you'll get the release versions of stuff19:33
jtaylorthen it won't migrate19:33
Laneyunless you version the BD in which case you'll get uninstallable BDs19:33
Laneyyou can't win :>19:33
jtaylorso don't do it?19:33
psusiohh, the command to migrate checks the deps and bails if they aren't already moved?19:33
jtaylorpsusi: it checks installability19:33
jtaylorjust like in debian19:34
psusigot ya19:34
jtaylorbut without rc bugs as blockers19:34
jtaylorat least currently19:34
Laney(hassle ∞ to get that fixed)19:34
micahgwait, why wouldn't versioned BDs work?19:35
jtaylorthe backports can't depend on backports bug?19:35
Laneysame reason they always dont19:35
micahgthat's only alternate BDs19:36
Laneynope19:36
micahghrmm....are you referring just to backports, or in general?19:38
jtaylorjust backports19:39
Laneyjust the usual backports bug19:39
micahgright, because sbuild skips the versions...19:39
micahgor rather LPs implementation19:40
LaneyI wonder at which level you'd fix this19:42
Laneyinject a preferences file to ignore NotAutomatic when the chroot is created?19:42
ajmitchis a separate chroot used for the backports pocket?19:44
LaneyI dunno how it works19:44
Laneybut if not it still shouldn't be harmful to have a preferences file for backports all the time, should it?19:44
ajmitchno, I think that was suggested in the bug19:45
ajmitchslightly easier than un-forking sbuild19:45
Laneythat's a larger project, yeah19:45
Laneyso find out where the script to make chroots is... it's not in lp-buildd19:46
ajmitchmaybe scripts/ftpmaster-tools/manage-chroot.py in lp19:47
ajmitchwhich is a wrapper around soyuz chrootmanager19:47
Laneydon't have lp checked out here19:47
Laneycan you see if that's where it mangles sources.list when building for different pockets?19:48
ajmitchI can try, it may drive me mad in the process19:49
Laneyshould call 'override-sources-list'19:49
Laneybah, I'll start a branch of lp:launchpad :P19:49
* ajmitch greps the whole lp tree for that19:49
Laneyneed to cook dinner anyway19:50
ajmitchno mention of override-sources-list in lp:launchpad19:50
Laneymust be called another way19:51
Laneyhmm19:52
LaneyI see19:53
ajmitchfound something useful?19:54
Laneythat script is called from within launchpad-buildd19:54
micahglaney: infinity was going to do something like that (inject a preference to ignore notautomatic for backports)20:00
Laneyyeah20:00
LaneyI am trying to figure out enough of launchpad-buildd to see where you'd do it20:01
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!