=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
=== apw` is now known as apw
=== debfx_ is now known as debfx
=== peterm-ubuntu is now known as Peter-afk-onholi
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
=== Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000
[14:14] <hggdh> when will libvirt as fixed by bug 1055658 be promoted to precise-updates?
[14:14] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1055658 in libvirt (Ubuntu Precise) "Under load, libvirt fails to start VMs concurrently" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1055658
[14:15] <Mirv> I'll echo once more the mterry's queue plea to SRU team before going: < mterry> infinity, I just uploaded a new compiz to precise-proposed.  I was hoping to get it in before end of week/end of year to enable more testing and hopefully get it into 12.04.2
[16:40] <infinity> hggdh: When someone can reproduce and verify https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1027987
[16:40] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1027987 in libvirt (Ubuntu Precise) "Starting libvirtd takes too long because of "udevadm settle" timeout" [Medium,Fix committed]
[16:44] <hggdh> infinity: ah, it is tied to this bug also. Well, I will upgrade it on some of our servers; I wil check if they use storage pools and, if they do so, I will go ahead and mark this one -done as well
[16:53] <infinity> hggdh: The problem seems to be that no one can reproduce the original bug to verify it's fixed.  If you can actually do that, that would be helpful.
[16:55] <hggdh> infinity: I am not sure I will find storage pools in use, but I will try; if at all possible, I will get a scratch server and try it
[17:01]  * xnox has lvm-pool backed libvirt but not running precise on the host. maybe i can downgrade... libvirt to test this
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== henrix is now known as henrix_
=== lamont` is now known as lamont