[03:04] Len-nb: around? [03:04] micah I'm here [03:04] Did I goof? [03:05] micahg, ^^ [03:05] sorry :), no, was just wondering if there's a certain order or grouping with the uploads and which branches [03:05] or rather, idk yet :) [03:05] -look is unconnected [03:06] icon-theme should go before settings. [03:06] ok, I'll do look first then [03:06] looks easy :) [03:09] Len-nb: I'm going to remove smartboy and make you the uploader for -look since his change is now irrelevant (and I'll remove it from the changelog) [03:10] Sure. [03:10] I should have done that. [03:10] yeah, you'll know for next time, np [03:22] Len-nb: WRT -icon-theme, so, you need LP: #XXXXX to close a bug in Launchpad <-- note the # sign [03:25] ok, have to run an errand, will continue when I return [03:27] Ok bug number fixed [03:27] micahg, when you get back. [04:44] -look uploaded [04:46] zequence: ? 01:44 < zequence> holstein: PA works sort of the same with PA as it does with jack, IMO [05:10] micahg, do I need to put the version release note in the changelog? [05:10] Len-nb: where? [05:10] in -look [05:11] hrm, I thought that was done [05:11] let me push up my changes [05:11] Oh ok, [05:11] all pushed [05:11] you added a note [05:12] * De-versioned plymouth as per Scott [05:13] Ya, when you said -look was uploaded I thought I would see the commit, I didn't realize it was still local to you [05:13] yeah, sorry [05:13] I forgot :) [05:13] NP [05:40] Len-nb: oh, you donm't need to say you fix a changelog entry in the changelog unless you're fixing an old entry [05:41] micahg, ok. Should I do something about it? [05:42] well, I have a couple other comments [05:42] :) [05:42] xubunt-icon-theme in the changelog should be xubuntu-icon-them, second, your control file description update almost seems apologetic [05:43] actually, that's not the right word, but it reads funny for a package description [05:43] I'll have to look. [05:44] I can see what you mean. [05:45] This package adds the few missing icons ubuntustudio needs that no other theme provides. [05:46] Does that sound more descriptive micahg ? [05:46] that sounds better [05:48] Anything else I should do? [05:49] I think that was it [05:50] pushed [05:53] Len-nb: you forgot to indent the second line in your fix [05:54] (of the description) [05:54] Ya, I figgured. I forgot it had to be. [05:54] * micahg needs to either backport a newer lintian or upgrade to raring... [05:55] micahg, do I need to add a comment to the change log for that? [05:55] Len-nb: no, it's correcting the correction you made before :) [05:56] the changelog should be descriptive of the diff between versions, the commit message should be descriptive of the commit, there's not always a 1-1 correlation [05:57] Right. Fix is pushed [05:59] ok, I need to go to sleep, can I'll upload in the morning when I'm a little more comfortable with my diff skills (~9hrs) [06:02] Len-nb: have a good night [06:02] GN [06:02] I'll do my best to get them on tomorrow's ISOs [06:03] micahg, thank you [07:08] holstein, Yeah, I was referring to Audacity. One of my typical typing misses [09:29] hello ! [11:29] I'm preparing a machine which I can use remotely. Tried cloning a git repo on it, and after googling on the error message, what seems most likely is that my HW is failing! [12:38] zequence, bad luck... [15:12] Len-nb: i did not get to test nautilus/thunar last night. my daughter was sick. [15:12] i will test it tonight however [15:15] zequence: so... you are saying audacity what? [15:15] zequence: as a side note, im not interested in running audacity.. but i assume you feel i gave mis-information? [15:15] you are saying audacity is fine to use with jack? [15:16] do you agree that if someone needs to record stereo data and needs audacity, JACK is overkill? [20:31] sorry, I overslept :)