[03:04] <micahg> Len-nb: around?
[03:04] <Len-nb> micah I'm here
[03:04] <Len-nb> Did I goof?
[03:05] <Len-nb> micahg, ^^
[03:05] <micahg> sorry :), no, was just wondering if there's a certain order or grouping with the uploads and which branches
[03:05] <micahg> or rather, idk yet :)
[03:05] <Len-nb> -look is unconnected
[03:06] <Len-nb> icon-theme should go before settings.
[03:06] <micahg> ok, I'll do look first then
[03:06] <micahg> looks easy :)
[03:09] <micahg> Len-nb: I'm going to remove smartboy and make you the uploader for -look since his change is now irrelevant (and I'll remove it from the changelog)
[03:10] <Len-nb> Sure.
[03:10] <Len-nb> I should have done that.
[03:10] <micahg> yeah, you'll know for next time, np
[03:22] <micahg> Len-nb: WRT -icon-theme, so, you need LP: #XXXXX to close a bug in Launchpad <-- note the # sign
[03:25] <micahg> ok, have to run an errand, will continue when I return
[03:27] <Len-nb> Ok bug number fixed
[03:27] <Len-nb> micahg, when you get back.
[04:44] <micahg> -look uploaded
[04:46] <holstein> zequence: ? 01:44 < zequence> holstein: PA works sort of the same with PA as it does with jack, IMO
[05:10] <Len-nb> micahg, do I need to put the version release note in the changelog?
[05:10] <micahg> Len-nb: where?
[05:10] <Len-nb> in -look
[05:11] <micahg> hrm, I thought that was done
[05:11] <micahg> let me push up my changes
[05:11] <Len-nb> Oh ok, 
[05:11] <micahg> all pushed
[05:11] <micahg> you added a note
[05:12] <micahg>   * De-versioned plymouth as per Scott
[05:13] <Len-nb> Ya, when you said -look was uploaded I thought I would see the commit, I didn't realize it was still local to you
[05:13] <micahg> yeah, sorry
[05:13] <micahg> I forgot :)
[05:13] <Len-nb> NP
[05:40] <micahg> Len-nb: oh, you donm't need to say you fix a changelog entry in the changelog unless you're fixing an old entry
[05:41] <Len-nb> micahg, ok.  Should I do something about it?
[05:42] <micahg> well, I have a couple other comments
[05:42] <Len-nb> :)
[05:42] <micahg> xubunt-icon-theme in the changelog should be xubuntu-icon-them, second, your control file description update almost seems apologetic
[05:43] <micahg> actually, that's not the right word, but it reads funny for a package description
[05:43] <Len-nb> I'll have to look.
[05:44] <Len-nb> I can see what you mean.
[05:45] <Len-nb> This package adds the few missing icons ubuntustudio needs that no other theme provides.
[05:46] <Len-nb> Does that sound more descriptive micahg ?
[05:46] <micahg> that sounds better
[05:48] <Len-nb> Anything else I should do?
[05:49] <micahg> I think that was it
[05:50] <Len-nb> pushed
[05:53] <micahg> Len-nb: you forgot to indent the second line in your fix
[05:54] <micahg> (of the description)
[05:54] <Len-nb> Ya, I figgured. I forgot it had to be.
[05:54]  * micahg needs to either backport a newer lintian or upgrade to raring...
[05:55] <Len-nb> micahg, do I need to add a comment to the change log for that?
[05:55] <micahg> Len-nb: no, it's correcting the correction you made before :)
[05:56] <micahg> the changelog should be descriptive of the diff between versions, the commit message should be descriptive of the commit, there's not always a 1-1 correlation
[05:57] <Len-nb> Right. Fix is pushed
[05:59] <micahg> ok, I need to go to sleep, can I'll upload in the morning when I'm a little more comfortable with my diff skills (~9hrs)
[06:02] <micahg> Len-nb: have a good night
[06:02] <Len-nb> GN
[06:02] <micahg> I'll do my best to get them on tomorrow's ISOs
[06:03] <Len-nb> micahg, thank you
[07:08] <zequence> holstein, Yeah, I was referring to Audacity. One of my typical typing misses
[09:29] <ttoine> hello !
[11:29] <zequence> I'm preparing a machine which I can use remotely. Tried cloning a git repo on it, and after googling on the error message, what seems most likely is that my HW is failing!
[12:38] <ttoine> zequence, bad luck...
[15:12] <scott-work> Len-nb: i did not get to test nautilus/thunar last night. my daughter was sick.
[15:12] <scott-work> i will test it tonight however
[15:15] <holstein> zequence: so... you are saying audacity what?
[15:15] <holstein> zequence: as a side note, im not interested in running audacity.. but i assume you feel i gave mis-information?
[15:15] <holstein> you are saying audacity is fine to use with jack?
[15:16] <holstein> do you agree that if someone needs to record stereo data and needs audacity, JACK is overkill?
[20:31] <micahg> sorry, I overslept :)