garyseven | that's sort of what I expected, I'm just wondering if it'll ever happen given the # of bugs triaged to higher priorities. | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
penguin42 | garyseven: A medium priority one with a responsive reporter who can easily test it, is in some ways easier to deal with than a critical one without any prospect of figuring it out | 00:01 |
penguin42 | garyseven: Given that it already seems fixed somewhere upstream, if it turns out to be possible to isolate the fix then there is a reasonable chance of it being fixed; that's a much easier case than say a bug which hasn't been fixed and actually needs someone to go and figure it out | 00:04 |
garyseven | if it existed upstream in the first place, that is. | 00:07 |
garyseven | anyway, ta, i gtg. happy xmas. | 00:07 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
snadge | 12.10 installer.. amd phenom 2 955, 8GB ram.. system has windows 7 on it, and a 64gb ext4 partition | 12:18 |
snadge | installer crashes | 12:18 |
snadge | trying to collect more useful info | 12:18 |
snadge | i select english.. then it goes to a screen about installing the bootloader.. and says ubiquity has crashed.. tries to auto report it, and doesn't appear to do so | 12:19 |
snadge | ok so ubiquity has crashed.. but i still don't really know why | 12:35 |
snadge | File "/usr/lib/ubiquity/plugins/ubi-partman.py", line 1238, in on_partition_list_new_activate | 12:35 |
snadge | ahh.. if you have a raidset defined, but not actually in use | 13:08 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
vagrantc | i'm curious if folks think an SRU for pithos is appropriate: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pithos/+bug/1093865 | 20:01 |
ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1093865 in pithos (Ubuntu) "pithos needs to be updated in precise" [Undecided,New] | 20:01 |
vagrantc | it seems completely broken, so should either be removed or updated. | 20:01 |
penguin42 | so it's now dead in the water? | 20:02 |
vagrantc | pandora changed their API, so the old version fails to log in. | 20:03 |
vagrantc | the version in quantal works fine, and rebuilding it for precise works fine. | 20:03 |
vagrantc | or rather, rebuilding the newer verison on precise, works fine | 20:04 |
penguin42 | vagrantc: Sounds reasonable given it's just a backport - although it is a universe - perhaps ask in MOTU to what they think? | 20:04 |
micahg | I would think an SRU is in order if it's cherry pickable | 20:05 |
vagrantc | penguin42: #ubuntu-motu? | 20:06 |
vagrantc | it's not cherry-pickable, in the sense that individual patches would fix the issue. | 20:06 |
vagrantc | it's a trivial rebuild backport, though. | 20:06 |
TheLordOfTime | vagrantc, i don't think backports are done for bugfixes usually... | 20:07 |
TheLordOfTime | at least according to what micahg's told me. | 20:07 |
micahg | idk, I'd have to see if the whole thing is SRUable or not | 20:07 |
penguin42 | but it's not actually a bug fix - it's catching up with an external API that changed under it's feet | 20:07 |
micahg | well, if it's not fixable through SRU, that's fine | 20:07 |
vagrantc | the package in precise is useless, so it should either be backported or removed. | 20:07 |
TheLordOfTime | micahg, is it possible to cherry-pick-remove a package from a given release? | 20:08 |
micahg | well, that still potential meets SRU criteria | 20:08 |
TheLordOfTime | (unrelated to vagrantc's question) | 20:08 |
TheLordOfTime | remove from one, but not from others, basically. | 20:08 |
micahg | theLordOfTime: this needs more discussion, I'm not actually here right now :) | 20:08 |
TheLordOfTime | so you're a holographic representation of micahg. | 20:08 |
* TheLordOfTime preps the EMP :P: | 20:08 | |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
TheLordOfTime | yeah, i know, randomness, but sometimes a brief jump into the random is refreshing now and then. | 20:09 |
TheLordOfTime | well, back to fixing stuff in nginx :P | 20:09 |
vagrantc | thanks for your help, folks. | 20:30 |
* vagrantc waves | 20:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!