=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh [14:41] infinity: chort is a sad panda https://launchpad.net/builders/chort/+history [14:42] pinged lp-ops as well. === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime [15:04] infinity: chort is on manual, but these need to be retried: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20121221/+builds?build_text=&build_state=chrootwait [15:19] emailed doko about them. [15:47] xnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1473072/ - running [15:51] * cjwatson vanishes again [17:04] ack. [17:14] http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12.10.1.dsc seems like an odd place to have published that. Was it discussed outside the ARB with anyone? [17:22] hmm, that's a very bad idea indeed as there's nothing preventing a 12.10 system from just upgrading to an arb package [17:23] and it violates ARB policy wrt never including packages that exist in the archive [17:29] That's kind of what I thought. [17:34] ScottK, we were asking about that in -bugs, and it ended up shifting to -devel. [17:34] trying to see whats with that being in extras [17:34] I know. That's why I know about it. [17:34] indeed. [17:36] I really can't think of any good reason why we'd want it in there, so I'm going to remove it for now and send an e-mail to ARB + ubuntu-devel to try and understand what's going on there [17:37] alright, removed. Should disappear from extras.ubuntu.com the next time the mirror is synced (in an hour or so) [17:37] stgraber: I sent an email to the ARB list. [17:38] (while you were removing) [17:38] I cc'ed the ubuntu-release too. [17:38] ok, let me reply to that one then [17:39] once I moderate it through app-review-board [17:40] Nice having a moderated list as your primary "here's how you contact us". [17:41] well, I tend to moderate things pretty quickly at least [17:42] (even though I'm not on the ARB anymore) [17:42] not really better than having ubuntu-devel or ubuntu-motu as contact address I guess :) [17:43] That's one of the things I like better about Debian. Most of the lists aren't moderated, so you don't need to subscribe to send one message. [17:44] In hindsight I think we should have just dealt with ubuntu-devel having some noise rather than trying to apply the moderation stick to it. [17:44] (I can't remember what I thought at the time; IIRC it was Matt's initiative) [17:45] stgraber: Reading the backscroll in #ubuntu-motu, I see this lintian update broke lintian4python, so it wasn't without effect on other packages. [17:46] for the ARB mailing-list I tend to whitelist anyone who gets in the moderation queue and didn't send spam, though that's still a fair amount of manual work and depending when someone e-mails the list, a potential few hours wait (I need to sleep sometimes) [17:47] ScottK: is it "just" causing an apt break at install or is it installing then breaking lintian on the system? [17:47] ScottK: (as in, do we need to tell people to downgrade to the archive version?) [17:47] The lintian4python version in quantal is incompatible with that lintian. [17:48] It might be worth a short mail to u-d-a telling people that if they upgraded from extras they'll need to manually downgrade to the archive version if they want lintian4python to work. [17:48] (not that it has a huge user base) [17:48] stgraber, from my observations in #ubuntu and in a VM, its being held back automatically, like linux-headers-generic,. [17:49] so unless you're doing a dist-upgrade or specifying it specifically, i don't think its upgrading automagically for users. [17:49] TheLordOfTime: A lot of people will have just done apt-get dist-upgrade then. [17:49] ScottK, true. [17:49] And since we promise zero regressions post release and extras is enabled by default, I think we have to care. [17:49] mhm [17:51] First thing I do after a new install is disable extras. [17:52] People have chided me for being over cautious because "extras won't affect existing packages". [17:52] I guess "apt-get install lintian/quantal-updates" should be enough to get people to safely downgrade right? [17:53] I think so. [17:54] Upload was signed by "Bhavani Shankar " [17:58] am I reading this right that the version in extras is also higher than that in raring (and even raring-proposed)? [17:58] Yes :-( [18:00] fun... [18:02] so now we'll need something >= 2.5.11ubuntu13 in raring... let's hope Debian will do a new release by then [18:11] Probably a safe enough assumption === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk