[13:16] two connections to the Canonical server don't work as well as one there and one here === teknico_ is now known as teknico [15:16] hi hazmat [15:22] hazmat: the GUI debug server still tries to load external libraries from yui.yahooapis.com, I am making a card for that. Having https://jujucharms.com is great, but we have a problem: XMLHttpRequest cannot load https://jujucharms.com/charms/precise/juju-gui-17/json. Origin https://ec2-23-22-109-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin. I think we should allow all origins server side. [15:27] Makyo teknico bac frankban goodspud bcsaller hazmat: call in 3 minutes? [15:28] benji: ok [15:28] ok [15:28] benji, yep [15:32] yo benji [15:32] bac: G+ apparently doesn't like me today, one sec [15:36] benji: you called this meeting... [15:38] frankban: will you update LP for bug 1086822 [15:38] <_mup_> Bug #1086822: charm is very slow to start < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086822 > [15:38] link to branch, etc [15:39] bac: sure [16:03] frankban, hmm [16:04] frankban, so the link you gave isn't to a valid charm [16:04] ie https://jujucharms.com/charms/precise/alice-irc-1/json [16:04] * hazmat checks the cors access [16:06] frankban, it already allows for cors requests afaics [16:07] hazmat: aha! you are right, that's the link for Juju GUI. It works for other charms. Cool, so, only the debug server problem remains. [16:08] frankban, that's not the link for juju gui.. the link for the gui is https://jujucharms.com/~juju-gui/precise/juju-gui/json [16:08] the gui charm has never been through the charmers review queue for official inclusion [16:09] hazmat: that's the link GUI tries to load when you click on the "charms" tab of the Juju GUI service detail page. [16:10] interesting [16:10] that's sounds like a bug with local charms then [16:14] hazmat: filed bug 1095354 [16:14] <_mup_> Bug #1095354: When using local charms, the URL used to retrieve charm info is not correct < https://launchpad.net/bugs/1095354 > [16:54] suddenly debug works, no errors, no changes :-/ bac: does your latest merged branch fix something about how the project is built? [16:56] Has anybody played with the demo recently? It's a big buggy in places [17:02] do you mean a bit butty? OHWAIT [17:03] do we serve sandwiches via http? :-) [17:09] mi daresti una occhiata veloce a https://codereview.appspot.com/7026046 ? [17:09] osp [17:09] oops... [17:10] could someone please review https://codereview.appspot.com/7026046 ? [17:11] teknico, can't go wrong with a bacon and sausage butty [17:12] goodspud, I don't eat meat, you insensitive clo(u)d ;-P [17:12] (usually) [17:13] teknico: a tofu and asparagus butty then [17:14] nom nom nom [17:14] that's more like it :-) [17:16] frankban, approved with thanks :-) [17:17] teknico: :-) cool [17:22] frankban: i made a change at gary's request to project.json for the d3 specification. perhaps that fixed it? [17:23] goodspud: what do you see that is funny? [17:25] bac: hum... maybe [17:27] bac. https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/file/d/0B1IM--9A1RkTbjFTUGwwR0lBeXc/edit [17:27] bac: could you please check if https://ec2-107-20-78-229.compute-1.amazonaws.com/ works well for you? [17:29] frankban: the front page looks ok. was slow to load. anything particular i'm looking for? [17:30] goodspud: where'd that yellow line come from? [17:30] bac: errors in the Javascript console? [17:31] frankban: i saw some complaints about loading from http for fonts [17:31] bac, that is a "pending" relation line that persists if you move either associated service [17:32] bac: cool, thank you [19:41] benji, benji: either of you having slow access to the data center today? === BradCrittenden is now known as bac [19:41] bac: not that I have noticed. [19:41] bac: I wonder if the inrush of traffic about the phone launch is gumming up the works [19:42] maybe. plus PR is having an inaugural celebration right now. maybe all of those phone videos being pushed to FB is clogging our pipe [20:46] * bac -> dogwalk [20:55] bac and hazmat: the login branch is ready for re-review (https://codereview.appspot.com/7007047) [21:10] benji, cool, just sent some comments on replies to previous [21:11] hazmat: thanks; looking [21:11] benji, i think we should have a talk about this. i feel like there is a misunderstanding here [21:13] hazmat: sure, let me read over your replies and think for a minute and then we'll get together [21:13] benji, sounds good.. looking over the latest as well [21:55] hmm.. had to go over wip limit .. the reliable test branch wasn't recorded in a lane [22:08] hazmat: I did a review of that but forgot to mention that you listed yeti as a dep but don't use it [22:11] bcsaller, gotcha