TheLordOfTime | correct me if i'm wrong, but wouldn't this fall under the scope of bash-completion? | 03:07 |
---|---|---|
TheLordOfTime | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095180 | 03:07 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1095180 in etckeeper (Ubuntu) "incorrect bash-completion" [Undecided,New] | 03:07 |
yofel | TheLordOfTime: etckeeper ships its own bash-completion file so no | 03:25 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
pedro_ | happy new year folks :-) | 12:42 |
hggdh | ding-o-bell pedro_ | 14:17 |
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: bash-completion indeed | 14:19 |
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: oops. If, as yofel says, etckeeper has its own bash completion script, then it is there | 14:20 |
* hggdh should read the backlog in full | 14:20 | |
pedro_ | hggdh: happy new year! | 14:50 |
hggdh | :-) | 14:52 |
TheLordOfTime | yofel, hggdh, OK, wasn't sure, but its missing apport information, should we ask them to apport-collect for the bug? | 16:03 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: etckeeper does not have an apport hook, so all that the OP needs to do is state the UBuntu and etckeeper version (lsb_release -a and dpkg -l etckeeper\*) | 16:36 |
hggdh | TheLordOfTime: and a delicate nudge to use ubuntu-bug next time | 16:37 |
=== plars is now known as plars-vacation | ||
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!