=== Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth [06:42] could someone sponsor bug 1093220 ? [06:42] bug 1093220 in transmission (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Fix transmission-qt to open magnet links from a browser" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1093220 [07:07] Hi, due to LP #1078679, my sch-scripts package needs to temporarily ship a /usr/local/bin/gnome-panel wrapper. But when I put "local/gnome-panel usr/local/bin/" in debian/sch-scripts.install, dh_installlocal then complains: [07:07] dh_usrlocal: debian/sch-scripts/usr/local/bin/gnome-panel is not a directory [07:07] rmdir: failed to delete «debian/sch-scripts/usr/local/bin»: the directory is not empty [07:07] Launchpad bug 1078679 in gnome-panel (Ubuntu) "Gnome fallback - intermittent menus on top panel" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1078679 [07:07] How can I workaround the error? Or should I better use dpkg-divert gnome-panel instead? [07:08] (just until the gnome-panel bug is fixed, then I'll remove the workaround from my package...) === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ === mibitzi_ is now known as mibitzi === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === JanC_ is now known as JanC [16:56] I'll ask here since I didn't get a response on OFTC over the weekend, if a package in sid won't build from versions of packages in sid, is that an RC bug and is policy 2.2.1 the one to quote or something else? [16:58] A FTBFS is clearly a RC bug, and any maintainer wanting to argue which policy checkpoint that fails against is doing a very poor job - leave out the policy line. :) [16:59] it's arch:all (which is why it probably wasn't noticed) [17:00] so, just select FTBFS in reportbug then? [17:00] And "over the weekend" is a bit strange, you asked yesterday, we are in the middle of the week. ;) [17:00] Yes. [17:00] sorry, my mind is not grounded ATM :) [17:01] Just because it's a day off from work it's not weekend. *smirks* [17:01] I've been off from work for 2 weeks, so that kinda makes it feel like one big weekend in some ways... [17:03] If someone is familiar with upnp, I'd like to have a chat. :) [17:15] Rhonda: BTW, I've done FTBFS bugs before, just not of this type, so wasn't sure if the virtual severity was appropriate since it will always be built locally [17:16] It will, always? Why is it a FTBFS then? [17:16] because the dependency isn't satisfiable from the archive [17:17] Then your "always" classification is wrong. :) [17:18] micahg: you sometimes find FTBFS bugs for arch:all packages in the BTS too (when someone was doing an archive rebuild test) [17:36] geser: ah, oh, makes sense then [17:36] Rhonda: why is my always classification wrong then? Debian requires binary+source uploads? [17:37] * micahg will check backscroll later [17:46] micahg, thanks for handling the backports for znc -> quantal, precise, sorry it took a while [17:47] micahg: Because it doesn't work "always", just in special circumstances where the required dependency is installed. That's not "always" in my area. It "always" would fail on my system, for a start. [17:51] Anyone can tell me where I can find the proper procedure for making an upload that is made so the package is only rebuilt? [17:59] Quintasan: use "dch -R" to get the right version number and write a change log entry (usually explaining short the reason for the rebuild) [17:59] if the packages has no Ubuntu delta, you should get a version number "-XbuildY" otherwise the usual "-XubuntuY" [18:02] TheLordOfTime: sure, no problem [18:02] Rhonda: I meant locally as in not on buildd, not dkms style [18:19] geser: Tahnks! [18:19] duh [18:20] Thanks even === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [20:11] hello. i am trying to backport a package from raring to precise. i have built the package locally using backportpackage, however, i get a build failure when launchpad tries to build my PPA: [20:11] https://launchpad.net/~d-kessel/+archive/performous/+build/4184133/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.performous_0.7.0-1ubuntu1%7Eubuntu12.04.1%7Eppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [20:13] did you build it locally in a pbuilder chroot? [20:14] yes - backportpackage does that by default and i watched it build it [20:14] it does? [20:14] I though it only builds the source package [20:15] jtaylor: i have the .deb's here ;) and i think it is something with h2m that is used in the make process... i have another log here from an older version from the original developer: [20:15] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/58444047/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.performous_0.6.1~ppa1~lucid_BUILDING.txt.gz [20:16] there muste be something different on the build server... which is not in my pbuilder chroot [20:16] running ./performous --help during the build might give a clue [20:18] may i need special pbuilder configuration? i just used "pbuilder create" [20:18] trying --help next.... === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [21:37] I wonder whether canonical payed valve for steam :) [21:38] ok, so i gave up and filed a backport bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantal-backports/+bug/1095441 [21:38] Ubuntu bug 1095441 in Quantal Backports "Please backport performous 0.7.0-1ubuntu1 (universe) from raring" [Undecided,New] [22:06] micahg: so the unsolvable yade problem means ipython can't be backported? [22:07] can't we just screw that stupid requirement [22:07] or make an sru for yade? ... === medberry is now known as med_ [22:12] jtaylor: let's talk later about it, we should be able to solve it one way or another