[01:47] I was sent here because I have a nexus 7 to talk to people were putting Ubuntu on. That was 2 weeks ago and I see nothing can I find out where and when people are talking about that I have so many questions [01:47] http://randall.executiv.es/raring_nexus7 [03:30] for next time tripelb comes online, put him in contact with a nexus 7 tester who can explain stuff to him [09:43] Hello everyone :) [09:46] 63 members online, but no one's talking..? Okay then. [10:03] phillw: you there? [10:12] Am I the only one who's active here..? [10:13] DevonT or dtourond ??? [10:13] You should have said your username is dtourond ;) [10:14] when you need to talk to someone for example me, type his/her name [10:14] It was DevonT before but after a while I got bored & logged off. When I came back it just automatically used dtourond. [10:14] so he/she should notice that [10:15] Ok! [10:16] @amjjawad - so I guess we're the only two people who are active. [10:16] dtourond: Error: "amjjawad" is not a valid command. [10:17] amjjawad - so I guess we're the only two people who are active. [10:17] sometimes, users log in but they are busy or away [10:18] as I said on the fb group, people here from different time zones so it is better to arrage a meeting with someone before logging in ;) [10:20] amjjawad - Yeah, that's true [10:20] amjjawad - One time I was on an Anonymous IRC server (y'know, the hacker group) and it was just flooding with people. Almost every second there was a new message. [10:20] I was just shocked at this, but don't worry.. I understand.. [10:21] Glad you do [10:22] I must go now, I have some things to do :) [10:22] I will try to login later but no promises [10:24] dtourond: have you subscribed to the mailing list of QATeam? [10:27] amjjawad: Yes, you're talking about the "Lubuntu-QA team" https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa [10:27] right? [10:27] yes and there is ubuntu qa team as well [10:28] Amjjawad: Oh sweet! I don't think I'd need much help through Ubuntu [10:28] I have subscribed to both before and still getting the Emails. I must go now ... catch you later ;) dtourond [10:28] Okay, ttyl :) [10:28] I'm all into Lubuntu actually [10:29] Okay? [10:29] ok then, take care and cya soon ;) [10:29] Yeah, same to you. [10:29] will sure do [10:29] bye [10:29] Bye. === yofel_ is now known as yofel [18:00] morning! [18:02] hello SergioMeneses [18:04] balloons, hey hey, happy new year! I'm back from vacations === plars is now known as plars-vacation [18:05] me too, hehe! [18:20] balloons, I have a lot of email to read =S I can see autopilot is going well [18:20] yes, I've got lots to catch up on as well [18:20] but it's good [18:21] and we have the sessions to finalize dates on [18:21] gonna be a busy janurary [18:26] balloons, sure... Im checking the ubuntu phone os http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/01/ubuntu-phone-os-unveiled-by-canonical [18:26] yes.. check out the youtube video showing it in action [18:27] ohh, while I have you SergioMeneses [18:27] would you care to give a session on doing laptop testing this month? [18:27] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities/Classroom [18:30] balloons, :O and SergioZanchetta? does he know about this? [18:30] we sent a mail before break to the list [18:30] not sure if anyone got it.. never saw a response [18:30] anyways, I want to lock dates in [18:30] we wanted to do all of them this month [18:38] balloons, I saw the email but there is not answer from Sergio [18:38] :S [18:59] balloons, Can I give you an answer about the session later? I guess that I can but Im not sure [18:59] SergioMeneses, sure [20:01] Hi all, has anyone tried the Netboot armhf+omap4 image (http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/raring/main/installer-armhf/20101020ubuntu200/images/omap4/netboot/boot.img-fb.gz) ? [20:02] I'm not quite sure I found a bug [20:03] letozaf_, whats the bug? i doubt anyone else has seen it [20:03] also, how did you only get one bug for ubuntu manual partitioning? [20:04] hey Noskcaj letozaf_ [20:04] Well for the armhf+omap4 image I chose to install Basic Ubuntu Server and Ubuntu desktop, but when [20:05] I rebooted I only got a desktop with a background and nothing else [20:05] no icons no launcher nothing [20:05] hello balloons [20:05] :) [20:05] letozaf_, interesting. ERMERGERD balloons is back [20:06] for the manual partitioning, what else should I have encountered ? [20:07] I'm back indeed [20:07] had a nice break [20:07] good holidays for everyone? happy new year if nothing else [20:07] Welcom back balloons !!! [20:07] that will sink in at some point [20:07] happy new year to all [20:10] letozaf_, happy new year. my list (i think) is 1065789 bug 1080437 bug 1087409 bug 1086034 bug 1088054 bug 1087823 bug 1085173 [20:10] bug 1080437 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "no background during the 13.04 daily install" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1080437 [20:10] bug 1087409 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "*buntu dailys take 3 minutes to get to the next screen if install mp3 is selected." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1087409 [20:10] bug 1086034 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity slideshows still refers to 12.10" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086034 [20:10] bug 1088054 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Release notes firefox has no "minimise, maximise, close" buttons" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1088054 [20:10] wow! [20:10] die ubot, die [20:10] let me have a look at these bugs [20:11] i have a feeling i put one extra in, i'm not sure [20:11] so letozaf_ I think there's some more pending merges for the autopilot tests from you [20:11] if so, I will get to them [20:11] yes but the last two do not work :( [20:11] balloons, there is one [20:12] there should be two: nautilus and evince [20:12] i think i merged one of those [20:13] Noskcaj, for bug 1080437 this time it did not happen to me :( [20:13] bug 1080437 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "no background during the 13.04 daily install" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1080437 [20:13] Noskcaj, ahh, yes you do have the power [20:14] balloons, POWER! [20:14] letozaf_, interesting, maybe its VM only, i'm pretty sure bug 1087848 is [20:14] bug 1087848 in lubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu) "no login background lubuntu daily 13.04 amd64 Vbox" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1087848 [20:15] Noskcaj, unfortunatly I did not try to select try mp3 so also bug 1087409 did not happen to me either [20:15] bug 1087409 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "*buntu dailys take 3 minutes to get to the next screen if install mp3 is selected." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1087409 [20:15] sorry install not try [20:15] letozaf_, my point is there are many bugs, just keep a lookout [20:16] yes sir!!!! [20:16] you are right [20:17] but for the slideshow isn't it a bit early to report a bug, maybe the still have to work on them... [20:17] or do we still have to report this kind of bugs ? [20:18] letozaf_, scottk made the bug as a reminder, i just add it anyway [20:18] ok I asked because I was not sure about it [20:18] so next time I will also subscribe the bug [20:19] yes, bug 1086034 is known [20:19] bug 1086034 in ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity slideshows still refers to 12.10" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086034 [20:19] not an issue [20:19] err, well, lol.. typically it's not updated till beta/rc tim [20:19] but your right,m it is a bug :-) [20:19] your keyboard problem, i sometimes have that, usually accompanied by no keyboard at all and what looks like a compiz crash. balloons i only do it as a reminder [20:19] yes, it is good to file [20:20] Noskcaj, is a war machine, I mean on bugs :-D [20:26] indeed! [20:27] so for the armhf+omap4 image should I report a bug ? [20:27] Noskcaj, so I'm updating the live session testcase finally haha [20:27] I know we were talking a little about it before xmas [20:27] the first part is to add instructions for persistence that make sense [20:28] you also wanted to create files, etc, to check the persistence [20:28] balloons, i have no part in live session. i don't think that was me [20:30] ohh. gotcha [20:30] while you we away there were other testcases that need updating i did find [20:30] did you add them to the list? I should probably archive our old work now [20:30] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/TestcaseUpdates [20:31] balloons, note the very bottom, i'm not sure about the ppc one as we might close ppc down and i'm not sure ppc server i possible [20:33] and before i forget, can someone run an ubuntu daily install, and note when the (x) is at the top and when its not [20:33] the 'x'? [20:33] yes [20:34] my netboot re-write is http://pad.ubuntu.com/wfjvrAzFq2, my oem re-write is http://pad.ubuntu.com/hROELLDhue [20:35] the oem needs kubuntu only updates, could we get scott to do that? [20:36] Noskcaj, yes ask scottk [20:38] i have pinged him [20:39] phillw, can you try getting the -pwerpc guys to follow gilir's orders, i gave up an my mac can't boot usb [20:44] Noskcaj: I cannot order to order people, [20:45] phillw, "orders: [20:45] * "orders" [20:46] lol [20:46] well, testing this failed open on raring [20:46] usb disk creator blew up trying to start [20:47] lol [20:47] I had quite a lot of problems with usb disk creator today [20:47] had to use unetboot [20:47] :( [20:47] balloons: Ì cannot log a critical bug with Chromium, the reporting mechanism from Chromium fails and it needs to be reported upstream. Is michag or Chad back from their break? [20:47] letozaf_, btw, you don't need to use unetboot [20:48] you can simply copy the image straight to usb [20:48] with dd ? [20:48] yes [20:48] dd if=myiso.iso of=/dev/sdb [20:48] oh! never thought of this :) great [20:48] yea, really slick [20:48] Noskcaj: we have to run down problems in severity... a none working browser is pretty sad... one VM system not working against another is a another bad one..... [20:48] been that way since hmm 10.04? [20:48] not sure [20:49] Noskcaj: for your issue, do you have the ability to change screen resolutuion on the VM? [20:49] Noskcaj, so this 'x' thing [20:49] what all do you mean? [20:49] I'm in the installer now [20:49] phillw, is there anything that does work for you? balloons, it seems to come and go throughout the installer [20:50] k, I [20:50] i'll watch [20:50] yep, it's gone [20:50] ok, you got a bug for this? [20:51] balloons, no, if you could. [20:51] \o [20:51] gonna check using 'try ubuntu' then install [20:51] see if it changes anything [20:51] ScottK, http://pad.ubuntu.com/hROELLDhue is my work so-far, if you could finish it? [20:51] hey ScottK [20:51] balloons, good idea [20:51] Noskcaj: I got tied up on kvm bug, for which we have a workaround, I cannot test every testing system against all VM systems. I am pleased to see that the testdrive guys are also looking into your issues.... You better make sure the bug reports are there for them :D [20:52] phillw, yep, everything thats actually a bug is one, everything else is in the email [20:52] Noskcaj: they need bug reports for each... the bug [20:52] & wish lists [20:52] phillw, ok, i will make them now [20:52] Noskcaj: I don't have time to write the test case, but I can get it into the system if someone does. [20:53] Noskcaj: you have to give the devs bug's to close, else their work does not count :D [20:54] phillw, ok. [20:54] ScottK, i was hoping you would at least know what to do for it. balloons, phillw or myself could upload it anyway. i guess i will try and finish it [20:55] Sorry. Quite busy with $work ATM. [20:56] ok [20:56] Noskcaj, hmm.. actually I think it's ok [20:57] balloons, what is? [20:57] so, what's happening is that it doesn't want you to killl the installer once you start making disk changes [20:57] that's what's happening [20:58] oh, never mind then. but it has the x at the restart prompt, i wonder what happens if its clicked [20:58] hehe [20:58] well, if it's only the installer it would close [20:58] ok [20:59] on another unrelated topic, how can i get ubuntu on a hiapad hi802 / zealz gk802? [21:03] Noskcaj, if googling doesn't present some images / instruction my guess is to start with the basic core image [21:03] balloons: if you just want to log ##phillw - it's PPC stuff which may be useful when I bring Noskcaj up to speed on a request he has made [21:05] or arm image, depending [21:05] what instructions set does it support? [21:05] btw -- asking on #ubuntu-arm may help [21:06] balloons, i did, they dodged the question [21:09] ahh, well, that might be the asnwer [21:09] heh [21:09] see what happens when you get it [21:16] I wanted to carry out the Ubuntuone tests, but the testcase: ubuntuone-client/ubo-001 that checks that the Ubuntuone client can be installed must be "old" I mean on a Raring fresh install it's already installed [21:17] maybe the testcase should be updated [21:17] balloons, am i ok to upload the slightly edited oem install? [21:18] ahh I see it [21:18] yes, go ahead [21:19] err well [21:19] hmm [21:19] the highlighted bits are my only changes [21:19] http://lubuntu.com/ doesn't exist [21:19] only http://lubuntu.net.. no redirect :-( [21:20] yea, go ahead though [21:20] I was looking at this line
Launch 'firefox' and navigate to http://www.FAMILY.com
[21:20]
The FAMILY homepage is loaded and displays properly
[21:20] ok [21:21] ok, so the netboot changes [21:22] anyone having issues with apport not sending bug reports? [21:22] balloons, in raring? yup [21:22] yes, raring [21:22] bug for it? [21:23] no [21:23] and apport-collect doesn't work either [21:23] let me look [21:23] we need to open one [21:24] https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1060989 [21:24] Launchpad bug 1060989 in apport (Ubuntu) "Report isn't sent after clicking "Continue" while details load" [Undecided,Confirmed] [21:24] ok. [21:24] pitti mentions "Right, we didn't enable Launchpad reporting on Raring yet. They go to [21:24] errors.ubuntu.com only at the moment." [21:24] I can't believe they still haven't turned it on yet [21:25] I will check with pitti at some point [21:34] someone on raring wish to confirm? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1095443 [21:34] Launchpad bug 1095443 in usb-creator (Ubuntu) "Startup disk creator fails to load; "error talking to udisks service"" [Undecided,New] [21:48] switching the server to get package update from crashes update-manager on raring [21:49] dkessel, hmm [21:49] so, using update manager, changing the update server, then updating again causes a crash? [21:50] yes. that's what i did. trying again after apport is done [21:51] wait. apport is not working, right? [21:51] mh [21:51] well, it's not pushing to lp yet [21:51] ohh.. I got a crash too [21:53] dkessel, well, let's get a bug filed for this if there isn't one [21:53] balloons: lesson learnt: don't pop() an empty list :) [21:54] lol [21:54] yikes 10.4 mb crash file [21:54] eesh [21:54] oops sorry wrong channel [21:55] * TheLordOfTime hates laptop touchpads [21:55] my favorite: UnreportableReason: This is not an official Ubuntu package. Please remove any third party package and try again. [21:55] yeah :D [21:58] * dkessel tries to find documentation on how submitting such a bug with apport files manually would work... https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#Development_release does not help... [21:59] dkessel, you can use ubuntu-bug [21:59] in this case, ubuntu-bug update-manager [21:59] make sense? [21:59] balloons: ok - i guess you're doing that already now? [21:59] dkessel, yes :-) [21:59] but you can confirm and add stuff to it [22:01] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1095453 [22:01] Launchpad bug 1095453 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Changing download servers and updating crashes update-manager" [Undecided,New] [22:03] so i just write: "Confirmed on current package versions" ? or is "confirming" something different? [22:06] balloons: is writing a comment with "Confirmed on current package versions" enough as confirmation? [22:06] dkessel, confirming is to set the status to confirmed [22:06] it means someone besides the original poster confirm the issue [22:06] make sense? [22:07] once it's been set to confirmed it should show up to the bug folks and package maintainers to be triaged, etc, etc [22:08] balloons: ah, right. it is only shown after clicking the arrow next to the package name. i confirmed. and then i saw that it automatically got confirmed because i also said it affects me :) [22:08] * TheLordOfTime glances because he can [22:08] ahh.. didn't know that actually [22:09] BugSquad sometimes says don't do that [22:09] depending on the package ;) [22:09] sorry, had to say it : [22:09] :P * [22:09] but in your case i think you're fine with what you did :0 [22:09] :) * [22:09] not to reply and autoconfirm or ? [22:09] :) [22:09] balloons, to reply anyways [22:10] ahh [22:10] but for the bug in question i think you're OK [22:10] ... oops and my sbuild is breaking again :/ [22:10] * TheLordOfTime walks off [22:10] in raring i just got the error: "sudo: timestamp too far into the future: Jan 3 20:00:37 2013" the command then ran fine, what happend? [22:11] dkessel, you did fine btw. [22:11] your responding says "It also affects here, I can confirm it" works. [22:11] usually just the initial confirmation is all :P [22:11] phew :) [22:11] but QA runs a tad differently than what i normally see as bug triaging, which is why i rarely touch $current_dev bugs :P [22:12] unless i'm the one who is working on them (usually happens in cases of certain server packages) [22:12] yes yes [22:12] we's cause trouble [22:12] :P [22:13] Noskcaj, umm that's not impossible [22:13] balloons, hey, at least you guys find the bugs in packages that are at least coded semi-decently... [22:13] what command? [22:13] TheLordOfTime, what server packages would that be to cause you some work? ;) [22:13] at least you guys don't have to maintain php5 :P [22:13] dkessel, not directly under server team purview but... nginx primarily, and php5-fpm related things. [22:13] balloons, sudo apt-get upgrade. sudo apt-get update had ran fine [22:13] outside of server, anything i say "I like this, i'll help" :P [22:14] but generally i just do general triaging ;) [22:14] * TheLordOfTime returns to fixing sbuild [22:19] balloons, dkessel: the one thing Bug Squad, and particularly me, don't like, is seeing a thousand people post "I can confirm this" or "This happens to me." [22:19] two or three confirming things is okayish though ;0 [22:19] ;) * [22:19] yes.. the "me too" posts! [22:19] its when you get a billion people posting on one bug.... :P [22:19] tacked on again and again [22:19] mhm [22:20] right, that's why "affects me" was created i guess [22:20] mhm [22:20] :( oem install, of all things has a bug [22:20] me, if i care about a bug, i just subscribe to the bug :P [22:20] although i'm already subscribed to the packages i primarily work with :P [22:22] the series name you input changes nothing, at least in Vbox [22:29] Noskcaj, what do you mean [22:29] I should do an oem install again.. haven't done one yet this cycle [22:29] heh [22:29] whoo, Lubuntu's running smoothly in VM, compared to Ubuntu [22:30] Unity's a resource hog for VM testing of things :P [22:30] TheLordOfTime: the reason you hate that is because it raises the bug heat and actually makes someone pull their finger out and have a look at it :P [22:30] phillw, actually, i don't like it because it causes autoconfirms and then we have to actually ask for apport information or more info for when there's not enough [22:30] or they file against the wrong package [22:30] and need some talking to. [22:31] oh, and my FAVORITE thing for bug workarounds that I just absolutely want to slap people for: "Manually downgrade the libraries to a prior release's version!" [22:31] i aplogize for the ranting, i should be ranting in a secret channel soemwhere :P [22:31] balloons, let me get the bug report finished and you will hopefully understand [22:33] TheLordOfTime: we have to deal with humans, if you would stop beating the daleks up.... we would not have these problems :P [22:35] bug 1095465 [22:35] bug 1095465 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu raring oem install series name is ignored" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1095465 [22:36] TheLordOfTime: then, my suggestion is to file a bug against bug-report and dis-allow you guys being pinged against a bug until a bug has the apport information, until that point it should simply show as 'incomplete'. [22:37] phillw, most of those that i see are server-team subscribed :P [22:39] TheLordOfTime: then, please raise a bug! I'd love to confirm it from desktop side (I get all the lubuntu related ones, such as browser, media palyer... etc). [22:39] phillw, moment i find one i usually file it [22:39] unless its an issue of PEBKAC and my own fault :P [22:40] TheLordOfTime: you're just picky :P try the DE bugs :D [22:40] DE? [22:40] desktop environment? [22:40] or are you talking about the german bugs :P [22:40] dkessel: ^^ [22:40] lol [22:41] * phillw nicotine break [22:52] bug 1095465 [22:52] bug 1095465 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu raring oem install series name is ignored" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1095465 [22:52] balloons [22:58] thx [22:58] bbl