[00:04] TheLordOfTime: Well? [00:05] Reporting spam https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/596082/comments/12 [00:05] Launchpad bug 596082 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[arrandale] Dell Latitude E6510 unable to use second external vga monitor" [Undecided,Expired] [00:06] agrestringere: Hidden, thanks for reporting. [00:09] evillyEvil, i'm going to sit back, there's more pro people than I here. [00:09] * TheLordOfTime has to fix a broken sbuild on one of his local build boxes anyways [00:16] branching successfully doesn't mean it was using ssh === slank is now known as slank_away [04:04] I've just built a package for Precise in a PPA... but it won't let me build the package for Quantal: [04:04] https://code.launchpad.net/~george-edison55/+archive/nitroshare-dev/+packages [04:04] "Copying failed of qtbase-opensource-src (5.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1~test2)" [04:04] george_e, qtbase-opensource-src 5.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1~test2 in quantal (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive) [04:04] george_e, to make that work, you need to differentiate them between releases [04:05] like my ZNC PPA does: https://launchpad.net/~teward/+archive/znc-1.0/+packages [04:05] same package, just... modified. [04:05] How do I do that if I'm simply copying from one PPA to another? [04:05] george_e, dget the source and republish to your PPA with new changelog entries? [04:05] its how ZNC 1.0-2 from Debian got into my PPA for ZNC 1.0 for all 3 releases (Precise, Quantal, Raring) [04:06] That's not the way it's _supposed_ to work :P [04:06] "supposed" to work assumes there's multiple repositories (apt0 [04:06] ever notice precise, precise-updates, quantal, raring, etc. are all separate repositories on the same mirrors? :P [04:06] You're right - I'm going to have to dput the source it seems. [04:07] george_e: You can't copy source and binaries one at a time into multiple series [04:07] * george_e wishes things were easier. [04:07] StevenK: What's the proper way to go about this? [04:07] StevenK, you can't publish the same version in the same PPA for multiple releases, either. [04:07] limitation of PPAs. [04:07] :| [04:07] If you can easily put the code into bzr, use a recipe [04:08] that *would* work [04:08] StevenK: Well... that's a possibility. [04:08] but if you're doing it manually, i think you're going to hit this limitation [04:08] But it will end up being a lot more work than I initially had hoped. [04:08] Yeah, a recipe seems the way to go. [04:09] TheLordOfTime: Um [04:09] wgrant, did they change the system? [04:09] TheLordOfTime: You *can* publish the same version in the same PPA [04:09] Always have been able to [04:09] wgrant, by hand? [04:09] since when? [04:09] You just have to copy the binaries too [04:09] You can't rebuild [04:09] ah... [04:09] Since Launchpad started managing packages in February 2006 [04:09] wgrant, see, nobody explained that to me. [04:09] Won't that be a problem with libc6 and other core system libraries that a binary links to? [04:10] You need to manually confirm that the binaries will work when copied, of course [04:10] wgrant, although, generally, you'd want to rebuild packages with the libraries in $release no? [04:10] george_e: Not usually if you copy *up* [04:10] Right... good point. [04:10] Copying binaries down is often a problem, and copying up won't always work due to soname changes and stuff like that [04:10] I think I'll just get the package building in a recipe. [04:10] But it's often possible to copy up [04:11] wgrant, typically i would rather rebuild each package for each release, because usually what i'm putting in a PPA needs to work with all libraries for the given releases (Case in point ZNC) [04:11] (also case in point: nginx) [04:12] Sure, sometimes you need to [04:12] and another case in point: php5 [04:12] (don't ask :/) [07:40] hi [07:57] just a question for now : 2 years ago we asked to have a meta-project to have all our web projects reunited, the name is ubuntu-fr-website-project. This year we want to extend our activities and have also desktop projects (tools, ubuntu lenses/scopes, server scripts…). To reflect that change, is this possible to change a meta-project ID or have we to ask for a new meta-project and attach everything to it or perhaps another solution ? [08:06] YoBoY: We can rename it [08:08] wgrant, can this make some side effects I have to take care before ? [08:09] YoBoY: Nothing really, and we can add a redirect from the old name if you want [08:09] ho cool :) [08:09] Ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion so we can keep track of it and verify your identity [08:10] yes sure :) it was just a question for now ;) [08:10] Sure [08:10] to know what it is possible to do :p [08:10] :) [08:11] another one : one of our members created a project with a "wrong" name, to delete it, I just have to ask to the deletion ? [08:11] Sure, same place [08:11] Or ask for it to be renamed, also at the same place :) [08:12] well, he already created a new one with another name. I just want to clean all this :p [08:12] Ahh [08:13] it was done in the rush [08:19] 2013, new year, new projects, new teams organisation perhaps :) [08:19] btw, happy new year everyone :) [10:46] hello all, have a question about Ubuntu SSO: does it work with Launchpad private team? [10:47] Gwaihir: what do you mean ? [10:47] SSO is different from LP [10:48] but if you log into LP with SSO to a private team you should have no issues [10:49] hmmm... kind of different: use case is I'm part of a private team in Launchpad, I use Ubuntu SSO to log in into another website than LP, but I do not see the private team listed as part of the login, and I cannot access what I should access as part of the team [10:49] just wondering if it is an error on our side, or something else [10:50] Gwaihir: so SSO issues you need to poke folks in #canonical-isd [10:50] czajkowski, ack [10:50] thanks! [10:51] Gwaihir: it may be quiet at this hour of the day, https://forms.canonical.com/sso-support/ might also be an idea if you dont get an answer [10:52] czajkowski, that is a good link, thanks! [10:57] np [10:57] Gwaihir: coming to fosdem ? [10:58] czajkowski, not yet decided... but I do not think, I have to check the schedule and see if there is something interesting also work-related [10:58] Gwaihir: can you let folks know in the italian loco https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Fosdem/2013 [10:59] czajkowski, sure! will forward the link [10:59] thanks [12:11] hi, wonder if someone could help me out i have a package on launchpad which is not building correctly, https://code.launchpad.net/~oly/+recipe/rhythmboxwebremote-daily-12.10 it does not seem to merge the changes guessing its something todo with my package files ? [12:12] wgrant: how do I diagnoise these? [12:12] i did have it setup and working but i changed the way it was layout, i had a debian folder in the trunk so i moved it to two seperate branches but since doing this the resulting packages are not complete :/ [12:14] oly: It built properly, but it failed to upload because the version is the same as one that built previously. [12:14] Possibly because you only include the trunk revno, and not the packaging revno, so a change in just the packaging branch will cause a version conflict [12:15] oh, i saw a failure i thought that was a previous attempt not the current one, i will bump the revision in the changelog and see if that fixes it [12:16] oly: You can add {revno:packaging} to the version template to include the other branch's revno [12:16] So a change to either branch will increment the version [12:20] okay, i have made those changes, not sure if this is the original issue i had but i can hope, queued the build again so fingers crossed :) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:07] cheers for the help wgrant the new package has files :) === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === lamont` is now known as lamont === slank_away is now known as slank === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [18:58] hiya! can anyone tell me if Launchpad supports private blueprints for private projects yet? [19:01] kirkland: I see this blog post...http://blog.launchpad.net/general/private-projects-and-private-blueprints-leave-beta === BradCrittenden is now known as bac === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [19:25] micahg: perfect, thanks === TheLordOfTime is now known as LordOfTime === LordOfTime is now known as TheLordOfTime [22:17] Hey, any PPA folks around? Got a technical question about the backing impl [22:17] I'm wondering exactly to what "~foo/bar" expands to on your dput sftp rule [22:17] since it's not scp, there's no environ or anything, so ~foo isn't easy to work out [22:18] What do you mean? [22:18] It doesn't expand [22:18] It's literal [22:18] StevenK: it's a literal "~foo" ? [22:18] It's not a real filesystem [22:18] Oh hot damn, great. [22:19] awesome, thanks folks.