| === glebihan_ is now known as glebihan | ||
| marcoceppi | THERE IS NO DANA, ONLY XUL | 03:47 |
|---|---|---|
| imbrandon | I aint afraid of no ghosts ... | 03:52 |
| === amithkk_ is now known as amithkk | ||
| MrChrisDruif | Hi everyone. I didn't even know we had "apps" webpages, but how can someone report issues/inclarities to one of those pages? E.g. https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/nitro/ | 17:43 |
| popey | whats wrong with it MrChrisDruif ? | 17:49 |
| mhall119 | MrChrisDruif: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-webcatalog is the project page | 17:51 |
| MrChrisDruif | According to someone that's actually using the app is the licensing BSD, which isn't proprietary afaik | 17:51 |
| mhall119 | oh, data problem, not code problem | 17:52 |
| cjohnston | it is bsd | 17:52 |
| MrChrisDruif | popey; Final line reads "Nitro is also free open source software." If that is true, then why does it say it's proprietary licensed? | 17:52 |
| mhall119 | MrChrisDruif: someone entered the wrong value in a form somewhere | 17:53 |
| MrChrisDruif | That's why we @ #ubuntu+1 were wondering where you could report things that are wrong? | 17:53 |
| mhall119 | hmmm, I wonder it they sent it through the consumer-apps team | 17:55 |
| mhall119 | MrChrisDruif: have you contacted the developers about this? | 17:55 |
| MrChrisDruif | No, I didn't even know about apps.ubuntu.com till a few minutes ago. | 17:56 |
| mhall119 | MrChrisDruif: it's listed a proprietary in USC as well | 17:56 |
| MrChrisDruif | I would've guessed as much. I think the information is pulled from the repos. | 17:58 |
| mhall119 | it's possible it was submitted to the software center under a proprietary license so they could use the consumer-apps review process rather than the ARB review process | 17:58 |
| popey | haha "https://launchpad.net/nitrotasks" "Simplified BSD Licence | 17:58 |
| popey | (Don't steal this software. Thanks.)" | 17:58 |
| MrChrisDruif | popey; =D lol | 17:59 |
| popey | i see nitro "on hold" in the "Ubuntu App Developers" trello board | 17:59 |
| popey | last updated July tho | 18:00 |
| mhall119 | yeah, I think that board is dead | 18:00 |
| popey | oh ☹ | 18:00 |
| popey | what do you use now? | 18:00 |
| mhall119 | s/board/review process/ | 18:00 |
| JanC | applications can be dual-licensed of course... | 19:17 |
| czajkowski | yup you can indeed | 19:23 |
| czajkowski | mhall119: apps can and are dual licenced | 19:24 |
| mhall119 | czajkowski: I know that, but I wasn't sure on the specifics of that one | 19:33 |
| popey | whether they are or not, the page is still wrong | 19:34 |
| popey | it is BSD-3-clause | 19:34 |
| bkerensa | mhall119: yes but I think the big issue is whether Mozilla would be willing to port mobile over since they have a competing platform | 20:15 |
| bkerensa | It would be nice to see Thunderbird come over though since its a community product now | 20:15 |
| bkerensa | mhall119: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/01/we-interview-the-mechanig-development-team | 20:51 |
| bkerensa | as requested | 20:52 |
| === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!