[05:17] <FourDollars> Hi, I just open a bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1097570 .
[05:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1097570 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "grub2-signed can not find the right device when there are two filesystems containing the file '.disk/info'." [Undecided,New]
[05:18] <FourDollars> it will be appreciated if you could fix this in Ubuntu 12.04.2.
[16:55]  * xnox should remember to pull before release.
[16:59] <xnox> ev: ayan volunteer to add features to usb-creator =) hopefully the next usb-creator maintainer =)
[16:59] <ogra_> haha
[16:59] <ogra_> you are mean :)
[16:59] <ev> haha
[17:11] <bdmurray> cjwatson: have you seen bug 1097570?
[17:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1097570 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "grub2-signed can not find the right device when there are two filesystems containing the file '.disk/info'." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1097570
[17:12] <cjwatson> bdmurray: Yes, unlikely to be able to fix for 12.04.2
[17:13] <cjwatson> It's a fairly hard problem
[18:01] <xnox> $ usb-creator-gtk
[18:01] <xnox> *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/python3: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x00007faa5c185f70 ***
[18:01] <xnox> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[18:02] <xnox> =/ at least first bug is now solved =)
[18:06] <stgraber> xnox: segfaults with python are so much fun ;)
[18:07] <stgraber> though you can probably just blame pitti, python modules shouldn't lead to segfaults of the interpreter ;)
[18:07] <xnox> stgraber: first time for everything =) well I am EOD, going to pop up and get a birthday present and then will be back to trace that =))))))
[18:08] <stgraber> it's a fairly common problem with gobject-introspection, a lot of gir modules require you to call some kind of class.new() function instead of just class(), not using new() leads to segfault (I remember that from Xkb at least), I still think it doesn't make sense but oh well
[19:09] <plars> xnox: ever seen something like bug #1097890
[19:09] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1097890 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "encrypted swap reused from previous install when wiping and reinstalling" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1097890
[21:52] <xnox> plars: =)))) nope I didn't see that. By default we reuse swap (well, why not right?!) but with encryption options added this may no longer be helpful at all. I wonder if this is reproducible with the server image as well.