=== chiluk_away is now known as chiluk === smb` is now known as smb [08:29] henrix_: The quantal/armhf linux build failed with a SEGV (probably cosmic rays). I've retried it, but it won't be done for another ~8h. Just a heads-up. === yofel_ is now known as yofel === henrix_ is now known as henrix [09:39] infinity: ack, thanks. === smb` is now known as smb === cking_ is now known as cking [12:39] So is the intent to go with 3.8 for raring? [12:52] * henrix -> lunch [12:54] BenC: yes. As far as I remember that was announced by kernel team at the end of UDS. [13:06] BenC, definitely [13:11] cking, henrix: rebooting gomeisa for kernel update [13:12] rtg: ack [13:15] ppisati_, rebooting tangerine for kernel update [13:15] rtg: ack [14:14] apw, anything I can do on the nexus7 kernel config syncup WI? [14:14] no hurry, just to make sure we're still on the same page wrt the scripted headstart you can give it [14:33] * ppisati_ goes out for a bit === kentb-out is now known as kentb [15:52] * ogasawara back in 20 [17:12] * ppisati_ -> gym === kamal1 is now known as kamal === kamal is now known as Guest1901 === kamal2 is now known as kamal [18:28] * rtg -> lunch === henrix is now known as henrix_ [20:47] * rtg -> EOD [22:33] bjf / henrix: Is it an assumption in the bot, or human error, that prepare-package-signed was set to Invalid for a non-ABI bump kernel? [22:34] infinity, probably an invalid assumption in the bot [22:34] (For 3.5.0 in quantal and lts-quantal, no signed, which means they'll be out of sync) [22:34] ugh [22:35] If you'd like to whip up a pair of signed packages for me and throw them at the PPA, you can fix the bot later. :) [22:36] infinity, will probably do that [22:36] (Since I already promoted linux/quantal before noticing the error) [22:40] infinity, i'm working on it [22:40] bjf: Oh, wait. Were all the reverts in modules? [22:41] infinity, looking, but i don't think so [22:41] Actually, you know what? While what I was about to say was technically true, it's probably just confusing to make the distinction and branch the workflow. [22:41] infinity, it's in the fs subsystem [22:42] Much simpler to just say "if linux revs, linux-signed also must" than to say the more-true-but-more-error-prone "if linux revs, but the kernel image stays the same, linux-signed can be left alone". [22:42] bjf: Yeah, check. We need a new -signed regardless, then. :P [22:42] bjf: Either way, like I said, it's probably just confusing to bother making the distinction anyway. [22:43] infinity, agreed, let's not try to optimize it [22:57] infinity, they are building [23:05] bjf: My hero. I'll fix up the bugs manually, if you want to make sure the bot gets this right next time. [23:06] infinity, bjf: it's fixed now. Our script to create tracking bugs was mistakenly marking it as invalid, as it did a substring check for 'prepare-package-', as previously we didn't have the -signed task, now it should behave properly [23:08] herton: Oh, shiny. Thanks for the quick fix. [23:35] Hi. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AsusZenbookPrime suggests using the kernel parameter acpi_osi= to make backlight control keys work. How concerned should I be about this breaking other unrelated things? [23:37] (I have enough understanding of what this does to know that it's causing the kernel to lie rather a lot to the ACPI stuff)