| === mechanobot is now known as amithkk | ||
| roaksoax | rvba: howdy! what;s the status of MAAS | 16:45 |
|---|---|---|
| roaksoax | rvba: are there anything left we need for thje precise SRU? | 16:45 |
| roaksoax | s/are/is | 16:45 |
| rvba | roaksoax: as far as we're concerned, everything is in there. Do you wanted to do something about bug 1086162? | 16:46 |
| ubot5 | bug 1086162 in maas (Ubuntu) "IPMI based power management default to IPMI 1.5 based authentication" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086162 | 16:46 |
| rvba | roaksoax: also, I suppose we can't SRU it before python-django is SRU'ed. | 16:47 |
| roaksoax | rvba: yeah so we are going to the Technical Board for an exception for everything | 16:47 |
| rvba | ah ok | 16:47 |
| roaksoax | rvba: since a SRU team member also reviewed another SRU needed and got rejected | 16:47 |
| roaksoax | rvba: and I think we should do something about that bug | 16:47 |
| roaksoax | rvba: but that can potentially create an issue when detecting IPMI right? | 16:48 |
| roaksoax | rvba: we need to detect the version itself | 16:48 |
| rvba | roaksoax: I don't know if that's doable to be honest, but letting the user configure it (see the diff I added in my last comment) was one solution. | 16:49 |
| roaksoax | rvba: i'd say go for it | 16:50 |
| rvba | roaksoax: this was just a suggestion because I have no way to test this on real hardware (the lab uses 1.5 IPMI). | 17:02 |
| rvba | roaksoax: looking at the milestone's list of bugs, I see there is another bug: bug 1064527. | 17:03 |
| ubot5 | bug 1064527 in maas (Ubuntu Raring) "detect_ipmi needs improvement. detects non-existant device in nested kvm" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1064527 | 17:03 |
| roaksoax | rvba: yeah that ltest bug is an impossible almost | 17:09 |
| roaksoax | there's no way to different | 17:09 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: howdy | 23:43 |
| bigjools | o/ roaksoax | 23:43 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: how's everything? | 23:43 |
| bigjools | apart from melting, great! | 23:43 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: heh... is that that warm in australia? | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: so I read you guys are finally done with MAAS | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: i'm gonna be filing this to the TB this upcoming monday | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: but will be doing some packaging testing | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: so I guess I'm free to do uploads without worrying anything will break | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: i will first upload 12.10 stabilization branch to raring | 23:44 |
| roaksoax | and then whatever is in trunk, is that ok? | 23:44 |
| bigjools | roaksoax: indeed we are moving on to another project - however rvb said he might look into the ipmi thing if you don't do it first | 23:45 |
| bigjools | it depends on how urgent it is? | 23:45 |
| bigjools | 12.10 branch to raring? No, that;s only for quantal | 23:45 |
| bigjools | upload trunk to raring | 23:46 |
| bigjools | it has all the fixes | 23:46 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: we can't SRU without having it in raring | 23:46 |
| bigjools | wtf | 23:46 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: so it *has* to go to raring first | 23:46 |
| bigjools | it's a different branch | 23:46 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: yeah it is fine | 23:46 |
| * bigjools boggles at the bureaucracy | 23:46 | |
| roaksoax | unless there's code changes that unable it to run in raring | 23:46 |
| roaksoax | then it should be fine | 23:46 |
| bigjools | it will run | 23:46 |
| roaksoax | ok so we are good | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | once SRU'd i'll upload trunk | 23:47 |
| * bigjools retracts that | 23:47 | |
| bigjools | it might run | 23:47 |
| bigjools | not tested | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | heh | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | alright, i don't think (hoping) there will be any issues | 23:47 |
| bigjools | but we know the chain.c32 thing is broken | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: yeah that's foundations | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | :) | 23:47 |
| bigjools | heh | 23:47 |
| roaksoax | raring wasn't even booting after installation | 23:49 |
| roaksoax | last week | 23:49 |
| roaksoax | so i'm hoping is kinda related | 23:49 |
| roaksoax | i haven't yet tested | 23:49 |
| roaksoax | i'll work on it tomorrow/monday | 23:49 |
| bigjools | ok | 23:49 |
| roaksoax | i wanna get this done too since i'm swamped with the HA stuff for OpenStack | 23:49 |
| bigjools | so | 23:49 |
| bigjools | does it not count that the trunk has got all the same revisions in it as the 12.10 stuff? | 23:50 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: i'm thinking we are going to have to bump major version | 23:50 |
| bigjools | I mean literally the same, they were backported by merging | 23:50 |
| bigjools | trunk is only separate because it has new features | 23:50 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: yeah we are going to have to bump the version of MAAS | 23:50 |
| bigjools | why? | 23:51 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: probably maas 0.2+bzr | 23:51 |
| roaksoax | we should actally have bumped maas | 23:51 |
| roaksoax | when we had the region/cluster controller | 23:51 |
| bigjools | I bumped the revno in one of the PPAs :) | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | ack | 23:52 |
| bigjools | but only because someone uploaded the wrong version :/ | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | he | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | heh | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | yeah we need to fingure something out for that | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | to differentiate the versions | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | i do think we should bump the version | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | to 0.2 | 23:52 |
| roaksoax | for raring | 23:52 |
| bigjools | well | 23:53 |
| bigjools | the same code will be in 12.04 and 12.10 | 23:53 |
| bigjools | so you'd bump it there too? | 23:53 |
| roaksoax | bigjools: no, so stabilization branch will continue to be 0.1 | 23:54 |
| roaksoax | trunk will be 0.2 | 23:54 |
| roaksoax | trunk has new features right? it just make sense to bump the version | 23:54 |
| roaksoax | or even 0.1.1 if you want | 23:54 |
| bigjools | roaksoax: yes but not the cluster change, just 2 small features | 23:54 |
| bigjools | cluster stuff is in 12.10 | 23:54 |
| bigjools | (awaiting 12.10 I mean) | 23:55 |
| roaksoax | right | 23:55 |
| bigjools | no, is in 12.10 :) | 23:55 |
| bigjools | awaiting 12.04! | 23:55 |
| roaksoax | right | 23:55 |
| roaksoax | so stabilization vs trunk should differ on their versioning IMHO | 23:55 |
| bigjools | we should have bumped for 12.10 :/ | 23:56 |
| roaksoax | indeed | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!