| === k1l_ is now known as k1l | ||
| bazhang | ascii spam; not seen that for a long while | 03:07 |
|---|---|---|
| k1l | its not that i have see this coming after the bot commands before :/ | 03:08 |
| === Amaranthus is now known as Amaranth | ||
| ikonia | @mark lorddelta #ubuntu-offtopic multiple "shit" usage after being asked not to, asked him to join #ubuntu-ops said "no thanks" so can stay banned | 09:26 |
| ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 09:26 |
| === IdleOne is now known as io | ||
| Pici | @mark #ubuntu xcat poor attitude | 14:15 |
| ubottu | The operation succeeded. | 14:15 |
| lhavelund | https://www.facebook.com/events/429226763815446/ | 15:37 |
| Myrtti | awww | 15:38 |
| lhavelund | :) | 15:41 |
| Tm_T | wwwwaaaa | 15:56 |
| Tm_T | lhavelund: want to have an advice from old and (not so) wise? | 16:00 |
| Tm_T | I give it anyway, never forget and always remember to, to, what was that, well, what that thing does here?! -> | 16:04 |
| Tm_T | ah, yes, I need coffee after having eaten | 16:06 |
| Tm_T | hi lorddelta | 16:08 |
| lorddelta | Greetings, I'm here to inquire as to the sentence/severity of my ban. It seems I received an auto-ban from #ubuntu-offtopic the other day for some mild language. Could anyone help me? | 16:09 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: as far as I know it was not any kind of autoban (and bans are not punishment) (: | 16:09 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: do you know why you were banned? | 16:10 |
| lorddelta | Tm_T: I have an idea but I'll not repeat the word here I suppose. | 16:10 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: were you requested to not use that word multiple times? | 16:11 |
| lorddelta | Tm_T: I don't recall being asked to stop; if I did it was during that conversation. | 16:11 |
| lorddelta | it was not* | 16:11 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: ikonia might have not been clear enough but you did respond to him about it | 16:13 |
| lorddelta | I did message him this morning, I really shouldn't have been up (it was 5 in the morning), and I needed to get sleep. | 16:14 |
| lorddelta | Oh, I didn't get a message from ikonia? | 16:14 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: in the channel, within the conversation, you did (: | 16:14 |
| Tm_T | and you did respond | 16:15 |
| lorddelta | Tm_T: I could I perhaps see the logs? I'm not sure if my software supports that at this time. | 16:15 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: it's not publicly logged channel, so one moment... | 16:16 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: the key point is for me that if you agree to play nice, I have no objections on letting you in (: | 16:19 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: you can do that? | 16:19 |
| lorddelta | Tm_T: I am sorry, I believe I can when my head is on straight. Fewer late hours, and I've added a filter in the software to help avert issues in future. | 16:20 |
| Tm_T | it's allright | 16:21 |
| lorddelta | Is balderdash ok? | 16:21 |
| lorddelta | As an acceptable word. | 16:21 |
| Tm_T | I don't see a point for using such words in the first place | 16:23 |
| Tm_T | but I believe the idea is to respect others, I don't think there can be a list of words that are ok and what are not | 16:23 |
| lorddelta | I understand, would self-censoring be better then? i.e. replace with *** | 16:24 |
| lorddelta | I don't mean as a license for saying whatever I want to | 16:25 |
| Tm_T | you shouldn't have need for such things in the first place (: | 16:25 |
| Tm_T | lorddelta: your ban is lifted now, you may try joining the channel | 16:25 |
| lorddelta | The decisions I made last night were poor, but the mistake would have been less if I had the filter setup I'd imagine. | 16:25 |
| lorddelta | Tm_T: thanks. | 16:26 |
| lhavelund | Tm_T: By all means! | 21:08 |
| lhavelund | Advice is good | 21:08 |
| ubottu | FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (mass join (1751 users, 10 overflows, 1761 limit)) | 22:33 |
| ubottu | FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (mass join (1704 users, 12 overflows, 1716 limit)) | 22:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!