| bkerensa | bdmurray: Is #1073114 a valid bug? | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| bkerensa | Bug #1073114 | 00:39 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1073114 in unity-lens-shopping (Ubuntu Raring) "Shopping Lens Does Not Respect User Privacy" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1073114 | 00:39 |
| phillw | bdmurray: when ever you pick this one up, ref bug 971918 I can'y immediately see the 'verification required' tag. (I'm looking at the instructions now), but I can confirm that it works and have commented on the bug. | 01:08 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 971918 in lxterminal (Ubuntu) "Ctrl-Shift-C issues a Break command" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/971918 | 01:08 |
| bdmurray | phillw: setting the quantal task to fix released is incorrect as the package is still in -proposed | 01:16 |
| bdmurray | phillw: additionally did you test in quantal or raring? | 01:17 |
| phillw | bdmurray: sorry :( | 01:17 |
| phillw | I'm using quantal, which is what the bug is raised against | 01:17 |
| bdmurray | phillw: okay, then if you verified it the correct thing to do is to change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done | 01:17 |
| phillw | bdmurray: where do I find that tag to alter? | 01:18 |
| bdmurray | phillw: then when the SRU team copies the package from -proposed to -updates the bug will be automatically set to fix released | 01:18 |
| bdmurray | phillw: in the bug tags? beneath the description and above related branches | 01:18 |
| phillw | that only lists precise? | 01:20 |
| phillw | Qauntal was the bug I knew of and the one I've followed. I'm quite happy to fire up a precise VM and test it in that. | 01:21 |
| bdmurray | the precise tag is not necessarily related to the verification-needed tag | 01:25 |
| bdmurray | they are 2 separate tags | 01:25 |
| phillw | bdmurray: is it just me being intensely dense (likely) or is it when I click on the 'verification needed' bit, I get a whole new window open asking me to tell it what bugs I'm asking about? | 01:31 |
| phillw | and when I put in the bug number it takes me back to original screen... :( | 01:31 |
| bdmurray | clicking on the tag performs a search for bugs with that tag | 01:36 |
| bdmurray | to edit the tags you want to click the pencil at the end of the list | 01:36 |
| phillw | bdmurray: is that correct? | 01:38 |
| phillw | because that reads to me that precise has been verified as okay, with no mention of quantal what so ever..... | 01:39 |
| phillw | I've never seen multiple tags against a bug - which is what is throwing me. | 01:40 |
| phillw | patch precise verification-done | 01:41 |
| bdmurray | the tags aren't necessarily related to each other | 01:42 |
| bdmurray | each tag is like a separate adjective describing the bug | 01:43 |
| phillw | bdmurray: now I understand, thanks to you.. May the Lord have mercy upon a new person. I've not had issues in the past. I'll ask Gema to mention it when she does https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Activities/Classroom#Section_2 | 01:49 |
| === Teufelchen_ is now known as Teufelchen | ||
| === Rcart is now known as Rcart_away | ||
| === Rcart_away is now known as Rcart | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| rbasak | bdmurray: hey, will crichton honour bot-stop-nagging? Or if not, is there a way to post a debdiff marked as a patch to a bug but have it not subscribe ubuntu-sponsors please? | 09:56 |
| === reels_ is now known as reels | ||
| bdmurray | rbasak: yes it will honor the tag | 15:41 |
| rbasak | Great. Thank you! | 15:41 |
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Rcart_ is now known as Rcart | ||
| TheLordOfTime | bdmurray, ping, this isn't a bug right? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1098697 | 19:58 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1098697 in linux (Ubuntu) "High Battery discharge rate when Laptop is off." [Undecided,Confirmed] | 19:58 |
| TheLordOfTime | if the laptop's off, can linux be affecting the discharge rate? | 19:58 |
| TheLordOfTime | pretty certain it cant if i understand modern laptop architecture. | 19:58 |
| bdmurray | I wouldn't think so but would check with jsalisbury | 20:02 |
| TheLordOfTime | whom you just pinged here :P | 20:03 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, I would also not think so, if the laptop was powered off | 20:03 |
| TheLordOfTime | which is what my systems hardware training suggested | 20:04 |
| TheLordOfTime | should I be converting that to a support question? | 20:07 |
| TheLordOfTime | although, tbh, the answer to eh suypport question is "Contact HP" | 20:07 |
| bdmurray | well maybe they mean suspend? | 20:07 |
| TheLordOfTime | perhaps | 20:09 |
| TheLordOfTime | i'm going to ask them, and Incomplete the bug | 20:09 |
| TheLordOfTime | if they say "No, I mean powered off state" then its notabug given our knowledge of typical laptop architecture and design. | 20:09 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, Maybe shutdown laptop, then pull the battery and re-insert it. That way you know the OS isn't in some sort of suspend or hibernated state. If the battery drain stops, then it may be a kernel issu | 20:11 |
| jsalisbury | s/issu/issue/ | 20:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | jsalisbury, i'd like to see whether its a case of suspend being used | 20:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | if it isn't then that should be the next question | 20:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | s/question/test/ | 20:11 |
| TheLordOfTime | jsalisbury, i'm aware of a powered-on state link between the linux kernel/system and power drain, that one i'm fully aware of, but i've *never* heard of any kernel, Windows, Linux, or otherwise, impacting battery drain in a fully powered off state. | 20:13 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, I agree. It could be that the battery is going bad, or some sort of hardware short. | 20:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | i agree with that too | 20:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | because i've seen battery death :p | 20:15 |
| TheLordOfTime | heck, it happened to me about two months ago | 20:15 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, sounds like a bad batch of batteries maybe? | 20:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | jsalisbury, well, that battery was 3 years olsd | 20:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | old * | 20:16 |
| TheLordOfTime | this system here, which is still my primary, is almost 4 years old. | 20:16 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, maybe let the batter sit for two days out of the laptop and see if it drains. If it doesn't, that could indicate a short in the laptop | 20:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | mhm | 20:17 |
| TheLordOfTime | jsalisbury, you may want to suggest that as possible tests of the battery, ASSUMING they're not suspending their system. | 20:17 |
| * TheLordOfTime is currently busy working on updating a server | 20:18 | |
| TheLordOfTime | s/updating/upgrading/ | 20:18 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, will do | 20:18 |
| TheLordOfTime | ... that's a tag i've not seen before... | 20:21 |
| TheLordOfTime | kernel-da-key <-- that | 20:21 |
| jsalisbury | TheLordOfTime, Yeah, I use that for my reports to keep track of specific bugs that aren't related to the development kernel. | 20:22 |
| TheLordOfTime | ah. i see. | 20:22 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| TheLordOfTime | jsalisbury, ping | 22:33 |
| TheLordOfTime | new updates to the bug. | 22:33 |
| TheLordOfTime | perhaps this is HP-specific in their architecture, and not something that is fixable in Linux? | 22:33 |
| TheLordOfTime | s/fixable/easily identified or fixed/ | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!