=== glebihan_ is now known as glebihan | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
micahg | bdrung: about Bug #1099003, does vlc dlopen libopus? | 02:55 |
---|---|---|
ubottu | bug 1099003 in vlc (Ubuntu) "VLC 2.0.5 won't work with Opus. Please include libopus0 from n-muench PPA" [Undecided,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1099003 | 02:55 |
micahg | bdrung: if so, we can backport opus from quantal to precise | 02:57 |
micahg | bdrung: make that can, as I see there's a build-dep in quantal | 02:58 |
micahg | bdrung: alternatively, we can backport opus+vlc from quantal to precise once the can't build depend on backports in backports bug is fixed | 03:00 |
wendar | recap: gnumeric is a trivial manual merge, but depends on goffice 0.10.0 | 04:09 |
wendar | goffice requires a sync, since the Ubuntu patches are no longer relevant | 04:09 |
wendar | but, it's a significant version change so requires a transition | 04:10 |
wendar | anyone got pointers for docs on library transitions? | 04:11 |
wendar | I'll ask cjwatson when the time zones roll around again if no other answers pop up | 04:13 |
micahg | wendar: preferably through merges/syncs from Debian if they're available | 04:13 |
micahg | if that's needed | 04:13 |
wendar | gnumeric is a merge from Debian, goffice will be a sync | 04:14 |
jtaylor | wendar: first setup a transition tracker http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ | 04:14 |
micahg | jtaylor: it's a handful of packages | 04:14 |
micahg | or 2 handfuls | 04:14 |
wendar | jtaylor: is that populated manually or automatically? | 04:15 |
jtaylor | automatic | 04:15 |
jtaylor | you just have to provide the rules | 04:15 |
wendar | goffice isn't in there, but then goffice is blocked on a manual merge | 04:15 |
micahg | it's actually 5 sources | 04:15 |
wendar | so, if goffice is sync'd, will it then appear in the transition tracker? | 04:15 |
micahg | not worth a tracker | 04:15 |
jtaylor | no the tracker has to be setup manually | 04:15 |
wendar | ah, automatically generated, for manually specified package names? | 04:16 |
jtaylor | you provide the afftected, good and bad lines you see in the existing ones | 04:16 |
jtaylor | but it may not be worth it if its only handful | 04:17 |
wendar | is it fairly similar to the Debian transition "ben" format? http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions | 04:29 |
micahg | indeed | 04:29 |
wendar | ok, exactly 5 packages | 04:44 |
wendar | micahg: is it reasonable to put in the Sync request for goffice, and include the list of reverse depends and reverse build depends? | 04:50 |
wendar | with the note that it may require a transition | 04:50 |
wendar | or would you lean more toward an email to ubuntu-motu (which is where I see some transition conversation happening) | 04:52 |
jtaylor | first do all rdeps still build? | 04:52 |
jtaylor | if yes (and they also work) the actual transition can be simple | 04:53 |
jtaylor | must get to bed now, n8 | 04:54 |
micahg | wendar: if everything works, then file the appropriate bugs with notes that they should go together | 05:29 |
wendar | micah: I'm doing a test build on all of them | 05:30 |
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
cjwatson | wendar: yeah, for five I'd JFDI. Let me know when I should merge gnumeric | 10:42 |
jtaylor | I probably asked that already but forgot, when doing an sru that build depends on another sru do I have to add versioned depends? | 12:51 |
jtaylor | e.g. jcc (>= 2.11-3ubuntu0.1) | 12:51 |
Rhonda | hmmmmm, why don't I have the ssh key from my laptop on jubany.c.c … | 13:20 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
wendar | cjwatson: a sync'd version of the latest goffice from Debian builds fine, but I get build failures in gnumeric and gnome-chemistry-utils which depend on it | 17:18 |
wendar | those are the only two reverse depends on goffice that have ubuntu changes, everything else is already sync'd from Debian | 17:19 |
wendar | the build failures aren't directly related to goffice, though | 17:22 |
wendar | which means, it could be other gtk packages in Ubuntu that are different versions than Debian's | 17:23 |
wendar | gnumeric fails with a missing identifier in GTK-Doc | 17:24 |
wendar | gnome-chemistry fails with a missing symbol from libxslt at link time (so, not even gtk related) | 17:25 |
bdrung | micahg: backporting opus+vlc sound good. what needs to be done once quantal EOL? | 17:53 |
bdrung | backport from raring to precise? | 17:53 |
micahg | bdrung: that or just upload the precise version with enable opus + enable ssl | 18:07 |
bdrung | micahg: looking at the precise->quantal diff, it's better to just enable opus and ssl instead of backporting the quantal version | 18:15 |
micahg | bdrung: I was going to backport quantal + reinstate the postinst | 18:16 |
bdrung | micahg: and revert the fonts-freefont-ttf rename, please | 18:16 |
bdrung | otherwise you can't install it (or you backport the freefont package) | 18:17 |
micahg | bdrung: we just need the reverse dependencies tested with the built versions, I can throw them in my PPA | 18:17 |
micahg | bdrung: ah, yes | 18:17 |
bdrung | backporting the font would be probably better | 18:17 |
micahg | it has a few reverse dependencies as well, but I don't mind if they're tested | 18:18 |
bdrung | micahg: once we have one version of vlc in backport, keeping it updated shouldn't be that big issue (because security updates will go to precise and quantal) | 18:21 |
micahg | right | 18:21 |
micahg | ah, we actually don't need the backport on backport version | 18:23 |
micahg | both are new packages in backports | 18:23 |
=== chris|| is now known as chris| | ||
=== hrww is now known as hrw | ||
=== kloeri_ is now known as kloeri | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
wendar | cjwatson: is there a better way to test a partial archive rebuild for a library transition? | 19:30 |
wendar | cjwatson: I'm beginning to suspect the build failures may have more to do with creating a test build environent from a mixture of apt-get installs of raring packages and local custom dpkg installs of the new versions of the packages | 19:32 |
wendar | cjwatson: so, it's getting the dependencies confused on building packages that depend on other packages I've already built | 19:32 |
=== zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
jtaylor | when doing an sru that build depends on another sru do I have to add versioned depends? e.g. jcc (>= 2.11-3ubuntu0.1) | 19:55 |
micahg | jtaylor: if the version is required for functionality, yes | 20:17 |
jtaylor | its only the build | 20:18 |
jtaylor | runtime doesn't matter | 20:18 |
micahg | yes, I mean if it's required to make the build work properly, it should be versioned | 20:18 |
jtaylor | k | 20:18 |
cjwatson | wendar: Does the new goffice render the old (other packages) uninstallable? | 21:01 |
cjwatson | wendar: If so, the simplest way is to put it into raring-proposed (where everything's staged anyway) and then it'll automatically stay there until we fix everything else up - and it'll be easier to test-build them once the new goffice is in raring-proposed | 21:02 |
cjwatson | wendar: if the new goffice changes library package names or similar, that's good enough for this purpose | 21:03 |
wendar | cjwatson: I'm getting FTBFS on gnumeric and gnome-chemistry-utils when I rebuild locally on the new goffice | 21:29 |
wendar | cjwatson: so, yes going ahead and syncing the new goffice into raring-proposed would work | 21:30 |
wendar | cjwatson: I can watch and fix any errors until all the dependencies are straight | 21:31 |
wendar | cjwatson: (the library package names are different for the new goffice, all 0.10 instead of 0.8) | 21:34 |
cjwatson | wendar: done on your behalf, then | 21:35 |
cjwatson | I'll have a poke at gnumeric tomorrow | 21:35 |
wendar | cjwatson: thanks! | 21:35 |
wendar | I did the merge for gnumeric | 21:36 |
cjwatson | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/ should tell you what's still blocking it (in a bit) | 21:36 |
cjwatson | point me to a source package and I'll start from that, then | 21:36 |
cjwatson | though the Ubuntu changes weren't complicated | 21:36 |
wendar | cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/1099027 | 21:36 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1099027 in gnumeric (Ubuntu) "Please merge gnumeric 1.12.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Wishlist,New] | 21:36 |
cjwatson | ok, ta | 21:37 |
wendar | aye, the changes were light | 21:37 |
* cjwatson not a major fan of attempting to sponsor UDD merges anyway | 21:37 | |
cjwatson | fine for other things, but there are a few too many directions to compare for merges | 21:37 |
cjwatson | so glad you just gave a debdiff | 21:37 |
cjwatson | anyway, -> tv, will look tomorrow | 21:38 |
wendar | enjoy :) | 21:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!