| allee | yofel: libkscreen depends on qjson >= 0.8.0. That's why it fails on qantal. r copied from kubuntu/ppa to experimental and the quantal build restarted | 01:02 |
|---|---|---|
| allee | s/ r / r needs to be / | 01:03 |
| kubotu | allee meant: "yofel: libkscreen depends on qjson >= 0.8.0. That's why it fails on qantal. r needs to be copied from kubuntu/ppa to experimental and the quantal build restarted" | 01:03 |
| yofel | done | 01:04 |
| allee | thx | 01:17 |
| ronnoc_ | anyone else run into an issue with a recent update in Raring that gives a "AMD Unsupported Hardware" watermark after a recent update? | 05:02 |
| ronnoc_ | I must not be alone: bug 1098561 | 05:15 |
| ubottu | bug 1098561 in fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu) "unsupported hardware overlay after upgrade to raring" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1098561 | 05:15 |
| Riddell | RC 3 tagging on thursday | 09:57 |
| * Riddell adds to diary | 09:57 | |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| ScottK | Riddell: Alpha 2 is moved, so it should line up for 4.10.0 now. | 12:23 |
| Riddell | lovely, thanks ScottK | 12:24 |
| Riddell | ScottK: kio-mtp and libwlocate in New should you be in a New mood | 12:28 |
| Riddell | yay no kde packages on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html | 13:05 |
| BluesKaj | Hiyas all | 13:22 |
| === schmidtm_ is now known as schmidtm | ||
| === fregl_ is now known as fregl | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| Riddell | ScottK: I just noticed http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/releases/raring/alpha-1/ | 14:32 |
| Riddell | so uec also does alpha releases I guess | 14:32 |
| ScottK | Interesting. | 14:32 |
| ScottK | That was sort of not mentioned. | 14:32 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| yofel | shadeslayer: re tomahawk, you should be able to just copy the PPA stuff with a clean changelog and maybe a fix here and there | 14:54 |
| shadeslayer | and copyright stuff | 14:55 |
| shadeslayer | your packaging has no proper copyright iirc | 14:55 |
| yofel | oh yeah, was too lazy for that | 14:55 |
| shadeslayer | :P | 14:55 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| afiestas | are virtuoso pacakges build/link with -g ? | 15:39 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: ? :p | 15:39 |
| shadeslayer | you mean with debug symbols? | 15:39 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: yes | 15:40 |
| shadeslayer | iirc no, but you could enable dbgsym to get some dbg packages I guess | 15:41 |
| shadeslayer | I see libvirtodbc0-dbgsym | 15:41 |
| shadeslayer | but that's only for ODBC libs I'm afraid | 15:42 |
| shadeslayer | I also remember being poked about this earlier, and asked around why we didn't build with dbg symbols, but I can't recall the reason behind it | 15:43 |
| shadeslayer | oh | 15:43 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: we do we do! | 15:44 |
| shadeslayer | "cd . && CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fstack-protector ...." | 15:44 |
| Riddell | shadeslayer: doesn't do much good if the symbols aren't extracted but | 15:45 |
| shadeslayer | Riddell: yeah | 15:45 |
| shadeslayer | I'm not completely sure how the dbgsym stuff works | 15:45 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: from where do I get the symbols? | 15:46 |
| afiestas | or Riddell :p | 15:46 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: There's no separate -dbg package I'm afraid | 15:46 |
| afiestas | okz | 15:47 |
| shadeslayer | huh | 15:47 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: there should be a -dbgsym package though | 15:47 |
| shadeslayer | Riddell: http://paste.kde.org/646616/ | 15:47 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: where? | 15:47 |
| shadeslayer | !dbgsym | 15:47 |
| ubottu | dbgsym is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash | 15:47 |
| afiestas | I hate when you send me to a wiki page | 15:48 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: follow " If there is no -dbg package:" | 15:48 |
| afiestas | with bazilion lines of text | 15:48 |
| shadeslayer | I'm still trying to figure out where the -dbgsym package is | 15:49 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: should I go ahead with the instructions? | 15:49 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| apachelogger | mhhh | 15:50 |
| apachelogger | http://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages | 15:50 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: won't do you any good .... I can't see a -dbgsym package for it | 15:50 |
| Riddell | there's no -dbgsym | 15:50 |
| afiestas | oks | 15:50 |
| afiestas | next time then | 15:50 |
| shadeslayer | k | 15:50 |
| shadeslayer | though that's the one package I'm aware of that intentionally has no -dbg package | 15:51 |
| shadeslayer | build id's looks really cool | 15:52 |
| apachelogger | I think I have seen ddebs somewhere on launchpad, so there is support for it I suppose | 15:52 |
| apachelogger | not sure if that has been widely discussed in ubuntu though | 15:53 |
| shadeslayer | yes, you have to enable them manually | 15:53 |
| apachelogger | why don't we do that? :P | 15:53 |
| shadeslayer | dunno | 15:53 |
| yofel | Space I guess | 15:57 |
| yofel | and it would mostly duplicate our debug symbols | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | wtff | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/v/virtuoso-opensource/ | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | that has the packages | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | but apt says it knows nothing about them | 15:58 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: yeah, for libvirtodbc0 | 15:58 |
| yofel | that's all | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | hmm | 15:59 |
| shadeslayer | apparently they got lost after 6.1.0 ? | 15:59 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: not really, that package is transitional | 16:00 |
| shadeslayer | Oh .. ok | 16:01 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: have a look at the build log though, seems to me a dbgsym packages should have been created | 16:03 |
| shadeslayer | s/a/the/ | 16:05 |
| kubotu | shadeslayer meant: "yofel: htheve a look at the build log though, seems to me a dbgsym packages should have been created" | 16:05 |
| yofel | dh_strip -pvirtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin | 16:05 |
| yofel | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: all non-arch-all packages for this build platform amd64: virtuoso-opensource-6.1 virtuoso-opensource-6.1-common virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin libvirtodbc0 libvirtuoso5.5-cil | 16:05 |
| yofel | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: packages to act on: virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin | 16:05 |
| yofel | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: ignored packages: | 16:05 |
| yofel | virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin is already stripped, ignoring | 16:05 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| shadeslayer | I think I'll shut up now | 16:06 |
| yofel | it ignores everything except libvirtodbc0 | 16:07 |
| yofel | the buildsystem completely ignores -g | 16:10 |
| apachelogger | afiestas: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kamoso/+bug/1099154 | 16:11 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1099154 in kamoso (Ubuntu) "webcam keeps active after kamaso is already closed" [Undecided,New] | 16:11 |
| yofel | hm, no | 16:11 |
| afiestas | apachelogger: terminal output perhaps? | 16:12 |
| apachelogger | please ask for it | 16:12 |
| apachelogger | :P | 16:12 |
| * apachelogger goes needs to get dinner while tomahawk builds hog his machine | 16:12 | |
| apachelogger | language fail | 16:13 |
| apachelogger | anywho, afk | 16:13 |
| yofel | lol | 16:13 |
| Riddell | apachelogger: tomahawk getting packages at last? | 16:14 |
| Riddell | meh, I can't get the symbols file in libqaccessibilityclient to work on all arches, I'll just make it arch specific unless anyone wants to see what I'm missing | 16:15 |
| * yofel gives it a try | 16:20 | |
| Riddell | yofel: I've got ec2s set up if it's useful | 16:21 |
| Riddell | I added --with kde which I'd forgot | 16:21 |
| Riddell | but it's still different on i386vs amd64 | 16:22 |
| yofel | my server should be fast enough, doesn't look like it'll be a long build | 16:23 |
| Riddell | no it's not | 16:23 |
| yofel | looks to me like it's missing a few {size_t} substs | 16:26 |
| * yofel retries | 16:26 | |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| yofel | Riddell: uploaded again, was missing a symbols file that was confirmed on both archs + --with pkgkde_symbolshelper it seems | 16:34 |
| yofel | hm, forgot to add --with kde. Does it need it? | 16:34 |
| Riddell | hmm I thought --with kde included pkgkde_symbolshelper | 16:43 |
| Riddell | I guess not, neurons still reconnecting | 16:44 |
| Riddell | thanks yofel! | 16:44 |
| yofel | yep, built now | 16:44 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: adding --with-debug to virtuoso results in: | 16:45 |
| yofel | ../libvirtodbc0-dbgsym_6.1.6+repack-0ubuntu1_amd64.ddeb | 16:45 |
| yofel | ../virtuoso-opensource-6.1-common-dbgsym_6.1.6+repack-0ubuntu1_amd64.ddeb | 16:45 |
| yofel | ../virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin-dbgsym_6.1.6+repack-0ubuntu1_amd64.ddeb | 16:45 |
| yofel | ../virtuoso-opensource-6.1-dbgsym_6.1.6+repack-0ubuntu1_amd64.ddeb | 16:45 |
| yofel | so maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea | 16:45 |
| * Riddell awards yofel elite packager of the day award | 16:45 | |
| yofel | thanks :P | 16:45 |
| mikhas | Quintasan_, http://lists.maliit.org/pipermail/maliit-announce-maliit.org/2013-January/000022.html | 16:46 |
| Riddell | ooh nice mikhas | 16:47 |
| yofel | \o/ | 16:48 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| Riddell | ScottK: do I want to use libboost1.49-dev or libboost1.50-dev? | 17:00 |
| ScottK | Riddell: 49 | 17:00 |
| * ScottK double checks | 17:00 | |
| Riddell | but but it's 0.01 old! | 17:01 |
| mikhas | Riddell, that release took much longer than expected … the road to Maliit 1.0 remains difficult. | 17:01 |
| Riddell | Quintasan_: are you able to package that or will you need someone else to do it? | 17:02 |
| yofel | Riddell: libboost-dev poins to 1.49. Unless that changes you'll get conflicts with 1.50 *somewhere* | 17:11 |
| * yofel adds a missing t | 17:11 | |
| shadeslayer | yofel: sure, but why isn't it there to begin with? | 17:12 |
| xnox | default is 1.49, you can use 1.50 if you need to. but we decided not to do boost1.50 transition ahead/without debian in raring. | 17:12 |
| yofel | dunno, whoever packaged it didn't think he would have to manually enable debugging symbols? | 17:12 |
| yofel | and since there's no -dbg package it probably wasn't checked either | 17:13 |
| shadeslayer | mmm | 17:15 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: let's enable it then | 17:15 |
| shadeslayer | I don't see anything in debian that says they had it and removed it on purpose | 17:15 |
| ScottK | Yeah. 1.49. | 17:17 |
| yofel | me neither, changelog doesn't mention debuggin symbols at all | 17:17 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: I'll upload with symbols then, easy to revert if it does something weird | 17:18 |
| shadeslayer | righto | 17:18 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: and symbols? | 17:18 |
| yofel | er | 17:18 |
| yofel | debug | 17:18 |
| shadeslayer | :P | 17:18 |
| shadeslayer | and do you plan on doing a separate -dbg package | 17:18 |
| shadeslayer | or just let dbgsym do the job | 17:18 |
| yofel | I think we can live with dbgsym's for now | 17:19 |
| shadeslayer | cool :_) | 17:19 |
| shadeslayer | lololol | 17:21 |
| shadeslayer | Unrecognized character \x10 at /home/buildd/.sbuildrc line 1. | 17:21 |
| yofel | o.O | 17:22 |
| yofel | Riddell: could you please upload knavalbattle ubuntu3? It's not in the packageset yet | 18:55 |
| Riddell | let me see | 19:00 |
| Riddell | mm, well spotted | 19:02 |
| yofel | more like apt told me :P | 19:02 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| ScottK | Anyone know of a reason not to release 4.9.4 to quantal-updates? | 20:13 |
| shadeslayer | not really | 20:17 |
| * shadeslayer checks if transmission was approved | 20:18 | |
| shadeslayer | nope, still there | 20:19 |
| shadeslayer | ScottK: ^ | 20:19 |
| ScottK | OK. | 20:28 |
| ScottK | Not right now, but maybe in a bit. | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | sure | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | not a big issue :0 | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | :) | 20:29 |
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| yofel | I don't know of any regressions in 4.9.4 other than the ones we fixed... | 20:30 |
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| === Tonio_ is now known as Tonio_aw | ||
| === Tonio_aw is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| shadeslayer | afiestas: btw dbg symbols now available for virtuoso, you'll need to enable the dbgsym repos | 22:09 |
| jessie_ | Has anyone packaged the new color management stuff? | 22:11 |
| shadeslayer | colord? | 22:12 |
| snele_ | shadeslayer: thank you for backporting 4.10 rc2 to precise. do you plan to backport 4.10.x series (or atleast last 4.10.5 bugfix release)? | 22:13 |
| shadeslayer | yep | 22:13 |
| afiestas | shadeslayer: thanks ! | 22:13 |
| shadeslayer | afiestas: <3 | 22:13 |
| shadeslayer | Riddell: yofel https://dev.launchpad.net/CommunityARMBuilds | 22:40 |
| yofel | Your build takes 4hrs or less to build - I think kdelibs already violates that | 22:42 |
| yofel | unless you need to meed only one of those | 22:42 |
| yofel | *meet | 22:42 |
| shadeslayer | well ... I was thinking more along the lines of Plasma Active | 22:42 |
| shadeslayer | because we can get PA builds up quickly | 22:43 |
| shadeslayer | for Nexus 7 testing and what not | 22:43 |
| yofel | yeah, as long as kdelibs is fine with less than 10 builds a week, wohooo \o/ | 22:43 |
| shadeslayer | if we have to upload kde4libs then we should just test build on the ARM farm and upload to the archive | 22:43 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: apparently they just virtualize armhf ontop of i386 now :D | 22:59 |
| yofel | I'll be happy if they tell me how they do that | 23:00 |
| shadeslayer | haha | 23:00 |
| shadeslayer | #launchpad has some info | 23:00 |
| shadeslayer | was just discussing it with them :) | 23:00 |
| yofel | if that's the same setup that the armhf pbuilder guide uses, then I'll be interested to see how kdelibs does there | 23:02 |
| yofel | I never got it to build in qemu-user-static | 23:02 |
| shadeslayer | dunno | 23:03 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-linaro/+bug/1077116 was what I got | 23:05 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 1077116 in qemu-linaro (Ubuntu) "automoc4 segfaults when building in an armhf pbuilder on an amd64 host" [Undecided,New] | 23:05 |
| yofel | haven't tried it on i386... | 23:05 |
| shadeslayer | you ran automoc on the Nexus 7 @_@ | 23:06 |
| yofel | yeah? | 23:06 |
| yofel | it's not different from any other armhf hardware once you have ubuntu on it | 23:07 |
| yofel | the CPU is even reasonably fas | 23:07 |
| yofel | t | 23:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!