=== bigjools_ is now known as bigjools === jtv2 is now known as jtv [13:15] Hello. I'm having a bit of trouble with MAAS provisioned VMware VMs not booting from disk. Where are the logs for each build kept (and is there documentation on where logs & such is? ) [15:20] rvba: howdy! wwhat was the IPMI bug again? [15:20] (the versions and stuff) [15:25] roaksoax: Hi, it was 1086162. [15:25] rvba: were you able to look at it and merge it? [15:25] bug #1086162 [15:25] bug 1086162 in maas (Ubuntu) "IPMI based power management default to IPMI 1.5 based authentication" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086162 [15:25] roaksoax: I'm waiting for your confirmation that the fix I suggest fixes the problem :) [15:26] rvba: alright, I'm testing this today :) [15:26] roaksoax: cool. [16:08] rvba: i think that for the ipmi version we should default to 2.0 [16:08] rvba: and whomever is using 1.5 should manually change it [16:09] or is it like that already? [16:10] roaksoax: the doc for ipmipower says: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1531116/. So I think we should keep the "auto selection" by default. [16:11] i.e. not pass anything in "--driver-type=" by default. [16:11] right, good point [16:14] roaksoax: btw, not sure you have time for this, but if you have, there is another critical bug in MAAS: #1081660 [16:15] bug #1081660 [16:15] bug 1081660 in maas-enlist (Ubuntu) "If maas-enlist fails to reach a DNS server, the node will be named ";; connection timed out; no servers could be reached"" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1081660 [16:15] rvba: alright, will look into that [16:15] ta [16:15] rvba: i will upload maas 1.2 to raring [16:15] and I'll test that [16:15] and see how it goes [16:16] roaksoax: speaking of raring, any idea on bug #1092265 ? [16:16] bug 1092265 in MAAS "Nodes fail to boot from local disk on raring" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1092265 [16:18] rvba: that's what i'm gonna test now too :) [16:18] roaksoax: great :) [16:24] rvba: so I don't expect that bigjools told you guys anything about the version changes i was planning to make for the upload right? [16:24] roaksoax: does not ring a bell [16:25] rvba: alright, so according to the branchs maas/1.2 and maas (trunk). I was thinking on releasing the package as maas-1.2~bzrXYZ for SRU [16:25] rvba: and trunk as maas-1.2+bzrXYZ [16:25] makes sense? [16:25] makes sense to use that versioning? [16:27] roaksoax: isn't it a bit bizarre to have trunk released with a name that contains '1.2'? [16:28] rvba: right so we are currently releasing as maas-0.1 [16:28] :) [18:52] rvba: still around? [21:26] mat/win 13 [21:26] err