jbicha | ricotz: my gjs problem was http://paste.ubuntu.com/1538095/ | 16:54 |
---|---|---|
ricotz | jbicha, ah, you didnt update gnome-shell concurrently | 16:55 |
ricotz | simply removing the "dbus import" there fixes it | 16:56 |
jbicha | well I built gnome-shell against gjs 1.35.4 | 16:56 |
ricotz | no the js code of gnome-shell contains a left over | 16:57 |
ricotz | just use the newer shell version | 16:57 |
jbicha | that was 3.7.4 and there haven't been any commits like that since | 16:57 |
ricotz | the js code isnt affected by a rebuild | 16:57 |
ricotz | http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/commit/?id=e294abc567b50ce4358dcd6be1e2f147b81ebcf8 | 16:58 |
ricotz | so 3.7.4 is fine | 16:58 |
ricotz | maybe you didnt update the -common package correctly? | 16:59 |
jbicha | oh, never mind I apparently reverted back to 3.7.3.1 since I had problems | 16:59 |
jbicha | thanks | 16:59 |
ricotz | ok | 16:59 |
jbicha | ok, now my problem is that I can't figure out how to get gnome-control-center to compile: http://paste.debian.net/225388/ | 17:05 |
jbicha | I am building against g-s-d 3.7.4 which was built against gnome-desktop 3.7.4 | 17:05 |
ricotz | jbicha, i was planning to take a look at those two packages | 17:09 |
ricotz | look like a missing ldflag | 17:11 |
ricotz | btw nice to finally have eglibc 2.17 | 17:13 |
ricotz | jbicha, as i said yesterday mutter/g-s might have problems without a newer clutter1.0 due xi2 bugs | 17:32 |
ricotz | jbicha, or maybe not, just go ahead | 17:34 |
ricotz | robert_ancell, hi | 17:39 |
robert_ancell | ricotz, hello | 17:39 |
ricotz | jbicha, robert_ancell, i have a e-d-s 3.7.4 here, any objections to push it to staging? | 17:39 |
ricotz | https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+sourcepub/2930384/+listing-archive-extra | 17:40 |
robert_ancell | ricotz, sounds good to me | 17:40 |
ricotz | i am not using evolution, but it doesnt make g-s crash or something here ;) | 17:41 |
ricotz | fabien doing evolution packages too, maybe i convince him to look at rdepends too | 17:42 |
robert_ancell | ricotz, I figure it's OK because it's a staging PPA - if it does break stuff then the new e-d-s doesn't get copied to the main PPA | 17:42 |
robert_ancell | and at least then we'll know | 17:42 |
ricotz | for non-evolution users it shouldnt do much | 17:44 |
jbicha | I don't think you should push e-d-s | 17:46 |
ricotz | jbicha, why | 17:47 |
ricotz | (already did) | 17:47 |
jbicha | I don't think we want to maintain all the rdepends that need to be rebuilt | 17:47 |
ricotz | but still stoppable | 17:47 |
ricotz | jbicha, currently it coexists fine | 17:48 |
jbicha | well maybe it's doable since we're already maintaining most of the gnome stack anyway | 17:48 |
jbicha | it was a bit different when we shipped the same gnome as ubuntu | 17:48 |
ricotz | wait with g-s upload until e-d-s is finished please | 17:48 |
jbicha | sure, I'm hoping I can figure g-c-c out first since it's kinda tied with gnome-shell | 17:49 |
ricotz | did you manager to refresh some more patches of g-s-d? | 17:50 |
ricotz | *manage | 17:50 |
ricotz | robert_ancell, are you working on any package? | 17:59 |
robert_ancell | ricotz, just updated libpeas, now working on colord | 18:00 |
robert_ancell | and baobab | 18:00 |
robert_ancell | in raring, not the PPA | 18:00 |
ricotz | ok, pushed eog | 18:00 |
ricotz | alright, i guess libpeas 1.7.0? | 18:00 |
robert_ancell | libpeas 1.6 in raring | 18:00 |
ricotz | or 1.6.2 | 18:00 |
ricotz | ok | 18:00 |
ricotz | i hope you can do 1.7.0 for the ppa too | 18:01 |
robert_ancell | sure | 18:01 |
ricotz | thanks :) | 18:02 |
jbicha | ricotz: no, g-s-d isn't really any better; I went ahead and pushed what I have to https://code.launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/gnome-settings-daemon/ubuntu | 18:24 |
jbicha | https://code.launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/gnome-control-center/ubuntu | 18:24 |
ricotz | jbicha, ok | 19:00 |
jbicha | ok, it was some Ubuntu patches that were breaking the g-c-c build | 19:32 |
jbicha | ricotz: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1538880/ | 20:55 |
ricotz | libedataserverui was removed upstream | 20:59 |
ricotz | just remove this dep and try again | 21:00 |
ricotz | which package is this? | 21:00 |
ricotz | i guess gnome-shell | 21:02 |
ricotz | jbicha, just drop that dep it is obsolete | 21:02 |
jbicha | yeah, it was gnome-shell, I had to replace it with libcamel1.2-dev | 21:04 |
ricotz | jbicha, camel is not a dep of g-s | 21:04 |
ricotz | libecal-1.2 and libedataserver-1.2 | 21:05 |
ricotz | if libcamel1.2-dev is needed the e-d-s package is missing an internal dev dependency | 21:05 |
jbicha | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1538931/ | 21:06 |
ricotz | yeah and missing internal dep | 21:07 |
ricotz | +an | 21:07 |
jbicha | ok I'll wait for you to push a new eds then? | 21:09 |
ricotz | yeah, i am on it | 21:09 |
ricotz | jbicha, why did you push a glib2.0 package to the ppa? | 21:14 |
jbicha | ricotz: um, don't we need it? | 21:15 |
ricotz | no it is in raring as you stated | 21:15 |
ricotz | the ppa builds against the proposed pocket | 21:15 |
ricotz | otherwise you would have seen quite some failures | 21:15 |
jbicha | oh I'll delete it then | 21:16 |
ricotz | also wait a bit before you delete packages | 21:16 |
ricotz | i guess you did with the previous glib2.0 package | 21:16 |
jbicha | do you want to delete it instead then? | 21:16 |
ricotz | no delete this one | 21:17 |
ricotz | but someone deleted the older one already | 21:17 |
jbicha | on the other hand... | 21:17 |
jbicha | I don't think we should encourage users to be using -proposed | 21:17 |
ricotz | no please remove it | 21:17 |
ricotz | if someone is able to deal with gnome3-staging then -proposed shouldnt be problem | 21:18 |
ricotz | also gobject-introspection was already deleted | 21:19 |
ricotz | jbicha, i figured you did that? | 21:20 |
ricotz | (i deleted the glib package now) | 21:20 |
jbicha | yes but I wasn't thinking about glib2.0 getting held in -proposed for a while | 21:21 |
ricotz | jbicha, if you want to badly do a binary copy | 21:21 |
ricotz | the builders are busy already ;) | 21:21 |
jbicha | how do I do that? | 21:22 |
ricotz | i copied both now | 21:23 |
jbicha | ok, how did you do it? | 21:25 |
ricotz | pm | 21:25 |
ricotz | if possible do a binary copy to avoid rebuilds and different binaries | 21:27 |
darkxst | ricotz, can you file a bug with your install headers patch upstream, and cc Jeff Walden | 23:13 |
ricotz | darkxst, i don't have a mozilla bugzilla account, feel free to do so | 23:17 |
darkxst | ricotz, ok | 23:18 |
darkxst | ricotz, also mozilla are planning on landing this before release https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=812265 | 23:18 |
ubot5 | Mozilla bug 812265 in Build Config "js/src needs versioning added to build system to support spidermonkey releases" [Normal,New] | 23:18 |
darkxst | which changes the versioning to match firefox numbers | 23:19 |
darkxst | so presumably mozjs-17.2 or similar | 23:20 |
ricotz | darkxst, i see, looks nice | 23:21 |
ricotz | with support to co-install multiple headers | 23:21 |
darkxst | yep | 23:23 |
ricotz | hoping this release will happen soon then | 23:24 |
darkxst | hopefully | 23:37 |
darkxst | ricotz can you whip up an install-headers patch with proper headers | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!