=== Noskcaj is now known as Noskcaj_afk [13:22] Woo [13:23] So, I fixed sru-report to check all the .changes files between release/updates and the current version in proposed [13:26] Hmm, but bug closure is *not* working [13:26] (I used duplicity/quantal as a test case) [13:27] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/quantal-changes/2013-January/012917.html and the earlier bugs weren't closed [13:27] Guess I need to fix LP [13:28] cjwatson: Hrm. I could have sworn I saw a closure work on a skipped changelog entry. Then again, that was on a bug with some really effed up tasks, so maybe I was mistaken. [13:29] (Oh how I want someone to fix that "ha, ha, you deleted a series from one of your tasks, now you can't ever use it on any others, sucks to be you" bug) [13:30] But the odds of me every looking at Malone's code are pretty slim, so I guess I'll just be pointlessly whiney instead. [13:32] Yeah, so the copier does calculate the right close_bugs_since_version internally [13:32] But it uses that on the upload_changesfile of the SPR it's copying [13:33] I think it just needs to use a different one of the family of bug-closing functions in processaccepted [13:35] Say, while you're keen on fixing bugs. I'm reminded of the copy/delete override race every time I do a new kernel ABI dance. [13:35] I've gotten remarkably good at re-overriding between when britney does the copy and when the publisher publishes, so they're never wrong on disk. :P [13:35] Yeah, I know, it's in the top three of my LP to-do list [13:36] Which consists of that, bug 1100748, and this bug-closure glitch, in some order [13:36] Launchpad bug 1100748 in Launchpad itself "Support phased updates via Phased-Update-Percentage control field" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1100748 [13:38] I'm puzzled by the announcement only having the latest version, though. The notify stuff seems to do spr.aggregate_changelog in this case ... [13:39] I'll have to set up something in the test suite and see what happens [14:32] ogra_: nexus7 builds are failing due to xrotate moving into xdiagnose; perhaps ubuntu-defaults-nexus7 needs to drop xrotate and xdiagnose needs to replace ubuntu-defaults-nexus7 (<< first-version-without-it)? [14:34] cjwatson, ping [14:34] pinging me when I've *just* been talking is a bit daft :) just ask what you want to ask [14:35] cjwatson, you said you fixed the 12.04.2 x86 builds, but no build comes up [14:35] have you checked the logs? [14:35] cjwatson, where are the logs?:P [14:35] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ [14:35] (also livefs-build-logs for earlier in the process) [14:36] cjwatson, thx [14:36] anyway, looks like my problem somehow [14:36] mv: cannot stat `/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntustudio/precise/dvd/tmp/precise-i386/CD1/casper/filesystem.kernel-lowlatency-pae': No such file or directory [14:37] cjwatson, yep [14:38] I've never actually asked. Does Ubuntu Studio want to use the 3.2 kernel or the 3.5 kernel for 12.04.2? [14:39] cjwatson, erm the problem is: We don't have such things as linux-lts-quantal-lowlatency... [14:39] Oh, true [14:39] OK, I'll flip you back properly then [14:39] cjwatson, thx [14:39] smartboyhw: There's nothing stopping your lowlatency people from doing a backport kernel if they wanted it. [14:39] (But yeah, you definitely don't have one right now) [14:40] infinity, we ARE planning to have one I think [14:40] But then we haven't done it [14:40] Given how trivial it is to do a backport build after the quantal rebase (which they're already doing), it might be worth poking apw or rtg for a quick howto. [14:41] linux-lts-quantal is an entirely automated process after linux/quantal is done. [14:41] infinity, ok [14:41] (automated, with human review and intervention, but automated nonetheless) [14:41] I will tell our kernel guy to poke apm [14:41] *apw [14:42] smartboyhw: OK, should be fixed for real now - kicking off a quick ISO-only rebuild [14:43] cjwatson, thx [14:43] cjwatson: I'm sort of the man to ask about kernel stuff for Ubuntu Studio. I think we'll want to follow Ubuntu on that [14:44] Right, so maybe for .3 then [14:44] (Since we're nearly out of time for .2) [14:44] cjwatson: We aren't currently maintaining a 3.5 version for precise. I'll need to talk to UTK about that [14:45] * cjwatson curses [14:46] Ubuntu Studio for *precise*, idiot boy Watson [14:46] !? [14:46] Never mind, you'll just get a spare raring build as well :) [14:46] cjwatson, ah LOL [14:48] cjwatson: I'll gladly answer any other questions on behalf of Ubuntu Studio in the future as well, if you can't get a hold of Scott. I'll try to be more up to date on what is written in mail lists, etc as well. [14:51] zequence, hmm you better resend your message [14:52] cjwatson: Did you get my message at 15:48? cjwatson: I'll gladly answer any other questions on behalf of Ubuntu Studio in the future as well, if you can't get a hold of Scott. I'll try to be more up to date on what is written in mail lists, etc as well. [14:52] I didn't [14:52] I may or may not remember ;-) [14:53] I'm logged in here most of the time anyway [14:53] But I shall try [14:53] * cjwatson <- bear of very little brain today [14:54] smartboyhw: should be happier now, once it finishes syncing out to the cdimage public site [14:54] cjwatson, :D === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha [14:59] Thanks cjwatson the images are back!