micahg | cjohnston: which patch? | 04:33 |
---|---|---|
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
siretart | Adri2000: fixed libav arrived in experimental, please try again | 07:17 |
Quintasan | \o | 07:27 |
Adri2000 | siretart: the dependency problems with libavcodec54 disappeared, libavutil51 and 52 are still both installed, and it fails for the same reason in the end :( http://adrishost.net/~adri2000/debian/actionaz-experimental-libav-ftbfs2-buildog.txt | 13:10 |
siretart | Adri2000: uh sh*t. i guess you found something serious here. let me investigate more | 13:11 |
siretart | Adri2000: what package is this? | 13:16 |
siretart | Adri2000: I don't get this. there is no occurance of ff_sqrt_tab in libavcodec53. still your build log bitches about this. please investiage what exactly requires ff_sqrt_tab@LIBAVUTIL_51. | 13:21 |
Adri2000 | siretart: package is actionaz, and I'm trying to build the version in http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/actionaz.git;a=summary (latest master) | 13:24 |
Adri2000 | (or latest commit in 'debian' branch, rather) | 13:24 |
Adri2000 | # objdump -T /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavcodec.so.53 | grep sqrt | 13:27 |
Adri2000 | 0000000000000000 DO *UND*0000000000000000 LIBAVUTIL_51 ff_sqrt_tab | 13:27 |
Adri2000 | siretart: that's what I have in my pbuilder-experimental, after installing libavcodec53 | 13:28 |
siretart | Adri2000: uh right, now I see what's going on | 13:31 |
siretart | Adri2000: the problem is libavutil51_6:9~beta1-1 | 13:31 |
siretart | that version is known to be broken, and has been superseeded by libavutil52 | 13:31 |
siretart | fortunately, the is also NBS, so ftp-master can safely remove it. your package should be able to build again once that happened | 13:32 |
siretart | Adri2000: please poke debian's ftp-master to NBS libavutil51_6:9~beta1-1 in experimental. that should do the trick | 13:32 |
Adri2000 | siretart: ok, will do that, thanks for the help | 13:36 |
=== nigelb is now known as Lord_Nigelb | ||
=== Lord_Nigelb is now known as nigelb | ||
mikodo | Can we please have Potamus back in the repos. I have it in 10.04 very nice. It is not in 12.04 Here it is http://offog.org/code/potamus.html Thanks! | 23:36 |
TheLordOfTime | mikodo, research shows it was removed in Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615644 | 23:44 |
ubottu | Debian bug 615644 in ftp.debian.org "RM: potamus -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, alternatives exist" [Normal,Open] | 23:44 |
TheLordOfTime | MOTU want to shed light on whether the same reason was why its not in Ubuntu? | 23:45 |
TheLordOfTime | (and AFAICT, it does have alternatives in the repos, and a good number of them) | 23:45 |
ajmitch | same reason, removals from debian are usually done in universe as well | 23:46 |
TheLordOfTime | that's what i thought, but i wasn't sure ;) | 23:46 |
ajmitch | you can see it on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/potamus/+publishinghistory | 23:46 |
TheLordOfTime | E: timeout :/ | 23:46 |
ajmitch | wfm | 23:46 |
TheLordOfTime | ah there it is. | 23:47 |
TheLordOfTime | Removal requested on 2011-05-05. | Deleted on 2011-05-05 by Steve Langasek | (From Debian) RoQA; orphaned, unused, alternatives exist; Debian bug (see above lines here on IRC) | 23:47 |
ajmitch | basically it got no love in debian & noone stepped up to maintain it | 23:48 |
TheLordOfTime | makes sense to me :P | 23:48 |
TheLordOfTime | and they are right though: there's a TON of alternatives | 23:48 |
TheLordOfTime | s/TON/lot/ | 23:48 |
mikodo | Hey guys thanks for the info. I have never compiled. Should I try, or by it not being maintained does it mean it might be buggy now and might not be worth the effort? | 23:51 |
TheLordOfTime | mikodo, upstream seems maintained... | 23:51 |
mikodo | TheLordOfTime, So, might be worth my effort then. Thanks | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | potamus-14.tar.gz06-Dec-2012 13:52 159K <-- latestupload on thier site | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | and yes, they have directory listing on | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | i should slap them for that... | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | since that's insecure... | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | mikodo, i'd just build it from source by hand, i agree with the debian bug that there's a good number of alternatives which exist. | 23:52 |
TheLordOfTime | and since its kinda not in debian, well... :P) | 23:53 |
* TheLordOfTime shifts attention back to figuring out why apt-mirror's timing out on mirroring from the regional archive. | 23:53 | |
TheLordOfTime | s/regional archive/regional mirrors/ | 23:53 |
mikodo | TheLordOfTime, I like it and I am going to build for the learning exp. | 23:53 |
zequence | 26 | 23:54 |
TheLordOfTime | have fun mikodo | 23:54 |
mikodo | TheLordOfTime, Thx. buddy | 23:54 |
TheLordOfTime | hmm.... i should probably ask in -server, but have any of you ever had apt-mirror fail to mirror from a regional mirror, whereas the system its on is able to apt-get update/apt-get upgrade from the same server that apt-mirror's trying to mirror? | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!