| sabotage | :q | 05:49 |
|---|---|---|
| rperier | Hey, could someone merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rperier/unity/unity/+merge/143961 ? | 09:34 |
| sil2100 | rperier: let me take a look | 09:36 |
| sil2100 | rperier: oh, could you also set the commit message for the merge? | 09:37 |
| sil2100 | rperier: this will be the message that will be essentially used when the branch gets approved | 09:38 |
| rperier | I did not set a commit message already ? | 09:39 |
| sil2100 | rperier: no - there are actually two things, you have set the 'description of change' | 09:39 |
| sil2100 | rperier: this thing is for explaining in detail what your branch does | 09:39 |
| sil2100 | Besides this, you can click on "set commit message" and paste there the string that you want to be in trunk after this gets merged ;) | 09:40 |
| rperier | ohhh directly from LP ? | 09:40 |
| rperier | it rocks :D | 09:40 |
| sil2100 | Also, what we can do to make this merge more interesting is linking it to a bug | 09:40 |
| rperier | mhhh I understand, ok | 09:40 |
| sil2100 | rperier: yes, since your branch can have more than one commits in it that you want to merge | 09:40 |
| rperier | nice :) | 09:41 |
| sil2100 | rperier: I think #1086276 could be linked to your branch, right? | 09:41 |
| sil2100 | LP: #1086276 | 09:41 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1086276 in Unity "lp:unity FTBFS on quantal: error: ‘bamf_view_is_user_visible’ was not declared in this scope " [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1086276 | 09:41 |
| sil2100 | rperier: once you add a commit message and link the right bug to the branch, I'll approve it globally and LP will merge it automatically | 09:42 |
| sil2100 | rperier: when we link a branch to a bug and the branch gets merged, LP will automatically add a 'Fixes #bugnumber' to the commit message | 09:43 |
| sil2100 | rperier: which helps in having it all sorted up | 09:43 |
| rperier | sil2100: yeah 1086276 is the right bug | 09:45 |
| rperier | mhhh LP does a lot of interesting things for us :) | 09:45 |
| rye | Hi, me again. I have connected my laptop (Intel HD 3000) to an external display (1920x1080) and (as I originally complained) dash blurred fading in current raring starts being uncomfortable (bug 1099787). But now I am trying to use previews in the fullscreen dash and the animation for shifting the rows, drawing the overlay, showing some content takes 3 seconds to complete (and feels reeeaaallly slow. In "restored" state - less than 1) - is it known or | 09:48 |
| rye | that's for another bug report. I am fairly sure that the amount of animation done does not change but it feels like it struggles redrawing full screen. | 09:48 |
| ubot5 | bug 1099787 in unity (Ubuntu) "Dash blur is too slow to fade in. Please don't fade it." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1099787 | 09:48 |
| rperier | I don't understand how to link a bug to this merge request :\ | 09:49 |
| sil2100 | rperier: you can do it in two ways | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | rperier: you can either do it through the bug, e.g. go into the bug and click 'Link a related branch' | 09:51 |
| sil2100 | rperier: or you can open your branch (not the merge request, but the page for your branch) and click 'Link a bug report' ;) | 09:51 |
| rperier | mhhh I see | 09:52 |
| rperier | thanks for these details , looking | 09:52 |
| rperier | sil2100: done | 09:54 |
| sil2100 | rperier: approved, thanks! | 10:03 |
| rperier | sil2100: thanks !! | 10:21 |
| didrocks | hey mmrazik, good flight back? | 10:28 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: Hi :) I've set a few Severity Compiz bug reports to invalid - they were correctly reporting possible divisions by zero, but CCSM already protected these variables from not becoming 0... | 10:32 |
| MCR1 | didrocks: But I guess Severity will continue to report them, so I am not sure if it was the ideal solution | 10:33 |
| MCR1 | *Coverity | 10:33 |
| MCR1 | not Severity :) | 10:33 |
| didrocks | MCR1: not really sure, I think tedg and mmrazik are more up to date than I was ever be on the binding reporting the bugs :) | 10:33 |
| didrocks | MCR1: so maybe check with them before invalidating? | 10:33 |
| MCR1 | mmrazik, was this the right decision or should we better fix those in another way ? ^^ | 10:35 |
| MCR1 | didrocks, thx 4 the fast answer :) | 10:35 |
| didrocks | MCR1: yw ;) | 10:35 |
| MCR1 | The coverity reports are very useful, btw. | 10:36 |
| MCR1 | Should improve code quality massively once all of them are fixed... | 10:37 |
| MCR1 | I guess Unity/nux could use such Coverity reports as well, guess those are planned ? | 10:40 |
| rperier | sil2100: mhhh so it's approved by the unity team and pushed into lp:unity by a jenkins bot ? | 10:57 |
| sil2100 | rperier: it should get auto-merged pretty soon | 11:00 |
| sil2100 | rperier: actually, normally it should have been merged already, but maybe the merging queue is full? Or something is broken? We'll see in a while | 11:01 |
| didrocks | sil2100: there is a compiz branch not merging as well | 11:04 |
| didrocks | approved since 7am | 11:04 |
| didrocks | hence my ping to mmrazik, but he seems not being around | 11:04 |
| MCR1 | sampo555 fixed a very important grid bug on the weekend, btw | 11:06 |
| MCR1 | grid is starting to get usable now :) | 11:06 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: oh, ok, then something indeed is broken | 11:06 |
| sil2100 | mmrazik: 2x ping | 11:06 |
| mmrazik | srry guys | 11:08 |
| mmrazik | looking on the compiz branch | 11:08 |
| didrocks | sil2100: waow, a 2x ping is more powerful than a 1x ping it seems! :-) | 11:08 |
| mmrazik | for some reason all connections to launchpad were stuck this morning | 11:08 |
| MCR1 | hehe | 11:08 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: I've seen the first one but it didn't seem to be urgent ;) | 11:08 |
| mmrazik | 2x does indeed sound more urgent :) | 11:08 |
| mmrazik | MCR1: I'll come back to you with the coverity stuff later but it should be fine to close as wontfix. | 11:09 |
| mmrazik | I'm just wondering if there is a way in coverity to avoid reporting such issues and whitelist them | 11:09 |
| MCR1 | mmrazik: that would indeed be cool | 11:09 |
| MCR1 | as otherwise they will come back probably ;) | 11:10 |
| rperier | sil2100: It was just a question to know the way it works usually :) | 11:10 |
| rperier | there's no hurry :) | 11:10 |
| MCR1 | but ofc those division by zero ones could be fixed in Compiz also, but as I said those values are already protected by the xml.in definitions | 11:10 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: ahah :) | 11:11 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: well, it needs to be merged before noon UTC | 11:11 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: as long as it's dealt today, it's fine :) | 11:11 |
| MCR1 | mmrazik: and there might be a lot of other false positives, so it would be cool if we could mark them as such once and for all | 11:11 |
| mmrazik | MCR1: yeah.. there is a way. I just need to talk with alesage who knows more about how this sort of stuff is done. | 11:12 |
| mmrazik | MCR1: and I just realized there are public holidays in US today | 11:12 |
| mmrazik | MCR1: so I guess I'll just drop him an e-mail and ping you tomorrow-ish | 11:12 |
| MCR1 | ok, cool - no hurry -> just a thought of optimization ;) | 11:12 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: btw. is there really a stalled branch? | 11:14 |
| mmrazik | I don't see anything | 11:14 |
| MCR1 | mmrazik: Last q: will unity also get under Coverity testing ? | 11:14 |
| mmrazik | MCR1: ack. Its in the process. We need some help from coverity helpdesk. | 11:15 |
| MCR1 | cool | 11:15 |
| mmrazik | sometimes its tricky to get anything out of coverity :-/ | 11:15 |
| MCR1 | +1 | 11:15 |
| MCR1 | the info extracted seems quite useful though ;) | 11:15 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: well, not movement from 6h, right? | 11:16 |
| didrocks | 5h | 11:16 |
| didrocks | I meant | 11:16 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: still don't see anything. | 11:16 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: it was probably stuck due to the launchpad network issue in the morning | 11:17 |
| mmrazik | and then it takes ~3h to build on arm... | 11:17 |
| didrocks | ok | 11:17 |
| didrocks | let's see then | 11:17 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: but I still don't see any branch waiting to be merged for compiz | 11:19 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: do you refer to a specific MP? | 11:19 |
| didrocks | one sec | 11:19 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: just finished to merge 10 minutes ago, and just got the email | 11:20 |
| mmrazik | ok | 11:20 |
| mmrazik | sil2100: pong btw | 11:20 |
| didrocks | mmrazik: so everything's fine here, was just long, probably due to this launchpad hickup | 11:20 |
| didrocks | thanks for checking | 11:20 |
| mmrazik | didrocks: yeah... srry for that. | 11:22 |
| didrocks | no worry ;) | 11:25 |
| sil2100 | mmrazik: ;) | 11:26 |
| sil2100 | rperier: merged \o/ | 11:26 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| rye | bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1055126 , ok, known | 13:09 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1055126 in Unity 6.0 "dash preview animation is slow on high resolution screens (also fullscreen mode)" [High,Triaged] | 13:09 |
| rperier | I think bug 692444 is a good candidate for the next bug, what do you think ? | 13:15 |
| ubot5 | bug 692444 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Launcher - clicking trash or device icons multiple times opens multiple instances" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/692444 | 13:15 |
| rperier | (it's tagged bitesize) | 13:15 |
| sil2100 | rperier: so it seems, but hm, not sure if it will be as easy as it seems ;) | 13:44 |
| rperier | I could try, no ? what do you think ? except if this bug is really hard to fix for a beginner... :) | 13:51 |
| sil2100 | rperier: you could look into it, I think it could be done with some workaround quite easily | 13:52 |
| sil2100 | (I hope so at least!) | 13:52 |
| rperier | I will do my best :) | 13:53 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| === jasoncwarner_ is now known as jasoncwarner | ||
| rperier | sil2100: If I want to focus a specific window (which is already opened) I need to use bamf or there is a module in unity for this case ? | 17:08 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| sil2100 | rperier: I think bamf is the safest bet | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | rperier: since in the case of the trash, it's a bit more complicated | 17:51 |
| sil2100 | rperier: you can ask the launcher about the running applications as well, but when the trash is started, it's acutally identified as a normal nautilus window | 17:51 |
| rperier | mhhh I see | 17:52 |
| rperier | so focus the trash might focus "Documents" for example... | 17:53 |
| rperier | it's not possible to detect the title of the window or its location or something ... ? | 17:53 |
| sil2100 | rperier: depends on what exactly you need - each running application in unity, which has an ApplicationWindow assigned has the title() property which can be used in a way | 17:58 |
| === larsu_ is now known as larsu | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| davidcalle | mhr3, just so you now, I've fixed the deprecated API issue by pushing a new branch, based on OpenWeatherMap. | 20:52 |
| jouzu | Hey, does anyone here know if there's some kind of petition to remove unity or something similar? | 21:04 |
| mhr3 | davidcalle, thanks | 21:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!