[00:20] <cprofitt> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1101213
[00:20] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1101213 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "G-c-c printing doesn't allow you to select a hp printer" [Undecided,Triaged]
[00:23] <cprofitt> just found the same situation for my priter as well. Simple work around, but not something I would want to get to release
[01:38] <agrestringere> Can I get someones opinion on a bug I'm currently managing? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1015297
[01:38] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1015297 in Xubuntu "Screen partially darkened after suspend and resume in Xubuntu" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[01:38]  * TheLordOfTime yawns and looks in
[01:38] <TheLordOfTime> what's your question?
[01:39]  * TheLordOfTime sees its marked as "Opinion", where it may just need package reassignment.
[01:40] <agrestringere> I've confirmed that Xscreensaver is the probable source of the bug due to the variability in graphics drivers and all users are reporting from Xubuntu...
[01:40] <TheLordOfTime> right, i can see that in your messages :)
[01:40] <agrestringere> Should I just reassign this to Xscreensaver and Xubuntu alone and leave the graphics package FGLRX out of it?
[01:41] <TheLordOfTime> firstly, i'm not sure why the "Opinion" status is used here...
[01:42] <TheLordOfTime> secondly is it really a bug in fglrx-installer?
[01:42] <TheLordOfTime> if it's not a bug in fglrx-installer at all, then it shouldn't be assigned against FGLRX
[01:42] <TheLordOfTime> at least, according to normal triage guides
[01:42] <TheLordOfTime> guidelines *
[01:42] <TheLordOfTime> but i'm not a drivers person, i only follow the triage guide *checks to see if fglrx/xscreensaver have different guidelines*
[01:43] <TheLordOfTime> well i know X has its own triage guidelines... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Triaging
[01:44] <TheLordOfTime> agrestringere, is it really a bug in the driver?
[01:44] <TheLordOfTime> s/the driver/fglrx/
[01:44] <TheLordOfTime> or is it really a bug in xscreensaver
[01:45] <agrestringere> It seems to be Xubuntu related because all the reporters have different video hardware, some Nvidia others ATI/AMD, etc...right?
[01:45]  * TheLordOfTime would defer to an Xubuntu dev for that
[01:45] <TheLordOfTime> and you said its xubuntu right?
[01:45] <agrestringere> Yes
[01:51] <TheLordOfTime> agrestringere, mind explaining the reasoning for the "Opinion" status on that bug?
[01:52] <TheLordOfTime> (I rarely see bugs marked as opinion, so...)
[01:54] <agrestringere> Because it may or may not be due to the package the reporter originally reported against and it's highly improbable therefore opinion...
[01:56]  * TheLordOfTime shrugs
[01:56] <TheLordOfTime> usually things don't end up as opinion unless the package maintainer sets that, so... *shrug*
[01:56] <TheLordOfTime> not that it matters, at least not for me
[01:56]  * TheLordOfTime yawns
[01:56] <TheLordOfTime> ... coffee refill time.
[01:59] <agrestringere> Okay, I'll just wait for the developers to take a look...
[01:59] <TheLordOfTime> or at least wait for their advice on triage procedure.
[02:00] <TheLordOfTime> i'm pretty certain standard triage applies, but... i'm tired so......... :P
[02:02] <agrestringere> Coffee can only do so much...
[02:02]  * TheLordOfTime sips the cup of coffee
[04:02] <agrestringere> micahg, so you think I should include all relevant graphics packages?
[04:02] <agrestringere> sorry wrong channel
[04:48] <TheLordOfTime> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1103319 Not a Bug in package?
[04:48] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1103319 in mountall (Ubuntu) "mountall source code repository is stale" [Undecided,New]
[05:26] <micahg> TheLordOfTime: right, see #launchpad
[12:50] <TheFU_Chat> sh1theads
[14:29] <TheLordOfTime> micahg, i KNEW i was missing a channel in my list, is #launchpad publiclogged?
[14:30] <TheLordOfTime> or can you drop logs my way?
[14:32] <Pici> TheLordOfTime: The logs are on http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ with the rest of the channels.
[14:34] <TheLordOfTime> Pici, wasn't sure, thanks :)
[14:36] <TheLordOfTime> ah there's the logs ;P
[18:13] <seb128> hey
[18:13] <seb128> the bugs reported by those guys are mostly due to an broken install: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~steinhauserchristian/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0
[18:14] <seb128> e.g all the "signal 5 in g_object_newv()" bugs
[18:14] <seb128> if somebody feels like dupping them from bug #907561
[18:14] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 907561 in gnome-session (Ubuntu) "gnome-session crashed with signal 5 in g_object_newv()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/907561
[18:31]  * jpds introduces seb128 to 'lp-set-dup' in lptools.
[18:32] <seb128> jpds, thanks ;-) I don't care enough to do it, still, but it can be handy ;-)