=== doko__ is now known as doko | ||
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== henrix_` is now known as henrix | ||
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch | ||
=== mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik | ||
=== useall is now known as clon | ||
=== clon is now known as useall | ||
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|otp | ||
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
=== mmrazik|otp is now known as mmrazik | ||
=== mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
bdmurray | cjohnston: ^ | 17:32 |
---|---|---|
cjohnston | I'm guessing the other cj, bdmurray ? | 17:32 |
bdmurray | yes the one with a w - cjwatson | 17:33 |
cjohnston | heh | 17:34 |
cjwatson | ta | 17:36 |
cjwatson | bdmurray: you didn't need to correct precise to precise-proposed :) | 17:37 |
cjwatson | Laney: rejecting your software-center upload, but only in favour of bdmurray's which includes it | 17:38 |
Laney | aye aye | 17:38 |
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
Laney | I don't really know anything about udebs - how would I go about finding out why gtk+3.0 doesn't want to migrate? | 18:17 |
Laney | * i386: libgtk-3-0-udeb, libvte-2.90-9-udeb | 18:17 |
cjwatson | Probably because the udeb is built with wayland support and the rest of wayland isn't udebificated | 18:17 |
Laney | this upload was to disable that | 18:17 |
Laney | and the wayland one did migrate | 18:18 |
cjwatson | well, they have dependencies like any other package | 18:18 |
cjwatson | those dependencies are only allowed to be satisfied by other udebs (i.e. */debian-installer/binary-*/Packages.gz) | 18:18 |
infinity | Nah, it's because the udeb depends on libc6-udeb (>= 2.17) | 18:20 |
infinity | It'll migrate shortly. | 18:20 |
infinity | Why the udeb dependencies don't seem to use .symbols, I don't know. | 18:20 |
cjwatson | Ah yes, it's made clear(ish) by _excuses | 18:20 |
cjwatson | "Depends: gtk+3.0 eglibc" | 18:20 |
Laney | ah, yeah, didn't look there | 18:20 |
infinity | Are udeb deps not generated by dpkg-shlibdeps? | 18:20 |
infinity | Cause the non-udeb packages depend on, like, libc6 (>= 2.4) or something. | 18:21 |
cjwatson | They are, or should be | 18:21 |
infinity | Seems silly that the udebs are much stricter. | 18:21 |
cjwatson | But there's special udeb support in shlibdeps, and maybe glibc doesn't set it up quite right | 18:21 |
infinity | Anyhow, mostly a non-issue, it'll migrate soon enough. | 18:21 |
infinity | It's possible glibc has no idea how to do that correctly, yes. :P | 18:22 |
Laney | Policy 8.6 says "Libraries with a corresponding udeb must also provide a shlibs file, since the udeb infrastructure does not use symbols files." | 18:22 |
infinity | s/glibc has/I have/ | 18:22 |
cjwatson | Ah, heh | 18:22 |
infinity | Right. No symbols. Check. | 18:22 |
cjwatson | Probably nobody cares much | 18:22 |
infinity | Hence the strict dep. | 18:22 |
infinity | Not world-ending. | 18:22 |
cjwatson | Since we don't need partial upgrade handling for udebs or anything | 18:22 |
infinity | Laney: Anyhow, should migrate in this cycle, dante/armhf just lagged a tag. | 18:23 |
Laney | Aye, ta. | 18:24 |
smagoun | Hi, can we sneak a new gnome-settings-daemon into precise-updates? The package has been sitting in precise-proposed for >1 month. There is 1 bug listed in the SRU; I verified it today. Bug 1034090 | 19:33 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1034090 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Precise) "Hotkeys not functional after upgrade to quantal's xorg (new xinput version)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1034090 | 19:33 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
infinity | smagoun: We're not past letting things into updates, don't worry. | 19:53 |
smagoun | infinity: oh, I know. I will break out the big guns when I get really desperate: a free XPS 13 for each bug resolved :P | 19:54 |
infinity | smagoun: Don't want one. | 19:55 |
infinity | smagoun: Entice me with something with a Lenovo logo. | 19:55 |
smagoun | infinity: X1 carbon? | 19:55 |
infinity | smagoun: T430s, or a Carbon X1, maybe? | 19:55 |
vanhoof | infinity: T40p | 19:56 |
vanhoof | =P | 19:56 |
micahg | infinity: I see my two SRUs never were accepted, I'm guessing it's too late, I guess I don't mind too much | 19:58 |
infinity | micahg: Not too late, but if they're not installation/media/first-impression critical, it's not a big deal either way. | 20:00 |
micahg | yeah, not needed for 12.04.2, I'll remove the milestones I added | 20:01 |
davmor2 | infinity: you want ideapad y580 you know you do | 20:01 |
infinity | davmor2: Pretty sure I don't. | 20:02 |
infinity | There aren't many laptops that are an upgrade to my T420s. | 20:02 |
infinity | The T430s being one of the few. :P | 20:02 |
=== henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
=== Noskcaj is now known as Noskcaj_AFK | ||
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk] |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!