| cjwatson | infinity: d-i pushed to -updates | 00:35 |
|---|---|---|
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| doko | cjwatson, infinity: online? | 02:40 |
| doko | hm, promoted libcloog-ppl1 for now | 02:51 |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch | ||
| === mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik | ||
| ogra_ | there is a brcm-patchram-plus in raring source NEW, it makes (or is supposed to make) BT work on the nexus7, would be great if that could be reviewed soon | 11:27 |
| seb128 | ogra_, seems ok, but shouldn't the source contain the license's text? e.g have a COPYING with the apache license? | 11:48 |
| === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk | ||
| ogra_ | seb128, debian/copyright points to "/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0" | 11:52 |
| ogra_ | i think thats enough, iirc we only need to ship the full license if there is nothing in /usr/share/common-licenses/ | 11:52 |
| === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik | ||
| ogra_ | cjwatson, (or anyone else familiar with sysvinit ) .... i'd like a quick glance over http://paste.ubuntu.com/1589449/ before i upload | 12:20 |
| ogra_ | (it is tested and works on the nx7) | 12:22 |
| cjwatson | what if /sys/module/cpu_tegra3 doesn't exist? | 12:22 |
| cjwatson | this script's architecture-independent | 12:22 |
| ogra_ | so i should add tests for every line ? | 12:23 |
| * ogra_ does so | 12:23 | |
| ogra_ | hmpf, that gets bulky | 12:24 |
| cjwatson | I think it's OK to assume that the interactive governor entries exist | 12:24 |
| cjwatson | I don't know about cpuidle | 12:24 |
| cjwatson | "if [ -d /sys/module/cpu_tegra3 ]; then ...; fi" around the two cpu_tegra3 entries seems to make sense to me? | 12:25 |
| ogra_ | yup | 12:25 |
| cjwatson | You could sort the entries while you're at it | 12:25 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, brcm-patchram-plus in NEW is a simple debian-native style package with one .c file under apache license ... does the source needs to contain the apache license text? | 12:27 |
| ogra_ | debian/copyright points to "/usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0" ... | 12:28 |
| seb128 | ogra_, well, my understanding (and what I've applied to far for NEWing) is that the license needs to be distributed with the source | 12:28 |
| ogra_ | right, mine always was that this only applies to licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses | 12:29 |
| cjwatson | If it's in common-licenses, and the situation is clear, it's normally fine for it to be referenced in debian/copyright | 12:29 |
| cjwatson | We don't need to police upstream's licence distribution practices; we only need to ensure that we're meeting our obligations ourselves | 12:30 |
| seb128 | ogra_, I got uploaded rejected in Debian because the LGPL was not included in the upstream tarball IIRC (and it's in common-licenses) | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | And distribution in common-licenses is enough | 12:30 |
| seb128 | uploads* | 12:30 |
| xnox | seb128: source upstream tarball typically should have a full license text, debian binary packages can simply have a pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses. | 12:30 |
| seb128 | well, anyway, I just wanted to check | 12:31 |
| cjwatson | xnox: it is not our job to police the contents of upstream tarballs | 12:31 |
| seb128 | ogra_, NEWed | 12:31 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, thanks | 12:31 |
| ogra_ | seb128, well, debian ... | 12:31 |
| ogra_ | :) | 12:31 |
| cjwatson | seb128: I can't speak for every Debian ftp-master, but that doesn't fall under the various things in REJECT-FAQ | 12:31 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, maybe I remember wrongly or maybe some ftpmaster are picky about that ... anyway, thanks for the clarification! | 12:31 |
| cjwatson | seb128: There has to be either an indication in the upstream tarball of the licence that the copyright holder(s) intended, or a description of how we figured out what the licence was | 12:32 |
| cjwatson | ("License II" in REJECT-FAQ) | 12:32 |
| cjwatson | Of course, it might still be a good idea to contact upstream and get them to spell out the licensing more clearly in their tarball | 12:33 |
| cjwatson | I just don't think it's cause for rejection | 12:33 |
| seb128 | noted, thanks | 12:35 |
| ogra_ | hmm, how do i pull that into the image now | 12:37 |
| ogra_ | i guess a dep from ubuntu-defaults-nexus7 will do | 12:37 |
| seb128 | ogra_, binNEWed as well | 12:40 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, http://paste.ubuntu.com/1589513/ | 12:43 |
| cjwatson | ogra_: LGTM | 12:50 |
| ogra_ | great, uploading | 12:50 |
| tjaalton | I've done a clean install of 12.10, then ran dist-upgrade and rebooted. after that I enabled fglrx and rebooted again, noticing that unity didn't run because the fglrx module wasn't built | 13:08 |
| tjaalton | the reason for that was that while linux-headers-generic got upgraded, it didn't pull the new headers package | 13:08 |
| tjaalton | so I did 'apt-get --fix-policy install', which did pull the new headers and a bunch of others, like ecryptfs-utils | 13:09 |
| tjaalton | also, linux-generic isn't installed on the system, although dpkg.log shows it being installed during image build | 13:10 |
| tjaalton | same for the ecryptfs stuff | 13:10 |
| tjaalton | so the question is, is it normal? | 13:14 |
| cjwatson | tjaalton: there's a known bug in the quantal installer that some of the kernel metapackages were mistakenly uninstalled - bug 1070427 | 13:28 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1070427 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Quantal) "Ubiquity removes kernel headers, fails to build nonfree drivers" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1070427 | 13:28 |
| cjwatson | We'll probably have to quirk it in upgrades from quantal, or something | 13:29 |
| tjaalton | cjwatson: oh.. | 13:29 |
| tjaalton | thanks | 13:29 |
| tjaalton | apw: ^ | 13:29 |
| apw | tjaalton, ahhh erp, ok that would expalin things | 13:30 |
| === smartboyhw_ is now known as smartboyhw | ||
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| balloons | infinity, so I went to verify this bug -- i don't see a package in -proposed for it. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/empathy/+bug/1018504 | 19:39 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 1018504 in empathy (Fedora) "Empathy doesn't display buddy list" [Undecided,New] | 19:39 |
| balloons | som the changelog doesn't show that it went in.. however the fix was backported from upstream: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/e/empathy/empathy_3.4.2.3-0ubuntu1/changelog | 19:41 |
| balloons | d'oh.. wrong changelog | 19:41 |
| balloons | hmm.. ok, so telepathy-glib0 never saw an update -- ahh, that's the upgrade | 19:45 |
| infinity | balloons: It wasn't empathy, it was telepathy. The bug's mistargeted. | 20:15 |
| balloons | infinity, yes I think it's sorted now | 20:15 |
| infinity | balloons: Ugh, and if people had just done the right bug paperwork, I wouldn't have had to bug you. There was another bug (without a precise task) that someone has verified months ago. Grr. | 20:32 |
| balloons | it's ok.. like I said, I thought it had gotten in and everything was taken care of | 20:32 |
| balloons | I actually looked at that last year again in Nov when it was pinged again | 20:32 |
| balloons | anyways.. let me know if I can do anything else to help | 20:33 |
| infinity | balloons: I'm releasing it now, so not much more you can do for that bug. :P | 20:33 |
| balloons | hehe | 20:33 |
| balloons | good | 20:33 |
| infinity | balloons: But we're driving toward 12.04.2, if you want to get together hordes of testers to throw at dailies. | 20:34 |
| infinity | balloons: Between the new kernel/X enablement stacks and SecureBoot, there's something there to break for everyone. | 20:34 |
| balloons | I know.. I was thinking about asking.. it's only going to be the dailies then -- no milestone at all? | 20:34 |
| balloons | I believe slangesk answered me on it a few weeks ago when I asked saying so | 20:35 |
| cjwatson | 12.04.2 will be the milestone | 20:36 |
| cjwatson | I posted a note to ubuntu-devel-announce a few days ago with the rough schedule for candidate images and such | 20:36 |
| infinity | balloons: Yeah, the milestone will appear soon enough. But early testing never hurts. Especially in the face of massive changes that we may need last-minute fixes for. | 20:37 |
| balloons | cjwatson, ahh, ok good | 20:37 |
| balloons | that's saner, I missed your annouce then | 20:37 |
| * balloons goes to look | 20:37 | |
| === henrix is now known as henrix_ | ||
| infinity | Dear Soyuz, the source isn't NEW when the package is already in -updates, kthx. | 21:28 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Ancestry again :-/ | 22:09 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Yeahp. And well-known. | 22:10 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Just annoys me occasionally. :) | 22:11 |
| cjwatson | Yeah | 22:11 |
| antarus | anyone know where arges hangs out? | 22:15 |
| infinity | Dear Soyuz. Oh. Wait. We've had this conversation. | 22:15 |
| infinity | antarus: #ubuntu-kernel is a fair bet. | 22:16 |
| antarus | do you know what TZ he is in? | 22:16 |
| infinity | Something vaguely Americanish. | 22:17 |
| infinity | He's in Austin. | 22:17 |
| antarus | ahh yes | 22:18 |
| antarus | SpamapS: ping | 22:28 |
| SpamapS | antarus: pong, sup? | 22:45 |
| antarus | SpamapS: hi | 22:45 |
| antarus | SpamapS: looking for a sponsor for eslayer ] [ yofel ] | 22:46 |
| antarus | ugh | 22:46 |
| antarus | chromeos screws me again | 22:46 |
| antarus | eslayer ] [ yofel ] | 22:46 |
| antarus | sigh | 22:46 |
| antarus | I give up | 22:46 |
| yofel | ^^ | 22:46 |
| antarus | bug 806248 | 22:46 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 806248 in unity (Ubuntu Precise) "unity::TimeUtil::TimeDelta returns an int value which overflows after 24 days of uptime" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806248 | 22:46 |
| antarus | yofel: sorry :/ | 22:46 |
| antarus | chromeos + chromoting == crappy copy and paste :/ | 22:47 |
| yofel | happens ;) | 22:47 |
| antarus | could be worse, I didn't paste confidential information ;p | 22:47 |
| infinity | tjaalton: ^ | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!