[00:08] <stefanct> i have a rather serious problem with umountfs not umounting my bind-mounted /home cleanly which results in unclean unmounting of the partition it resides on and i am not alone.
[00:08] <stefanct> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1103416
[00:08] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1103416 in sysvinit (Ubuntu) "12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[00:09] <stefanct> i hope this is not completely spam in here...
[00:09] <xnox> stefanct: first of all sysvinit is not used in ubuntu at all.....
[00:10] <xnox> hence that bug was not noticed at all.
[00:10] <xnox> we use combination of upstart + mountall to boot/shutdown.
[00:11] <stefanct> hm. i did an apt-file search umountfs which results in "initscripts: /etc/init.d/umountfs"
[00:11] <stefanct> and that was making launchpad to suggest sysvinit IIRC
[00:12] <xnox> sure that package ships that file, but upstart is the one that processes and acts upon it.
[00:12] <xnox> stefanct: can you also paste your /etc/fstab
[00:14] <stefanct> attached
[00:15] <stefanct> what should i have done re. the package then?
[02:58] <antarus> hrm
[02:58] <antarus> weird question perhaps
[02:58] <TheLordOfTime> hm?
[02:58] <antarus> but who decides which windowmanagers are supported
[02:58] <antarus> and why are some in universe, and some not?
[02:59] <antarus> I shouldn't say supported...I feel like that decision is fairly obvious ;p
[02:59] <antarus> but which are in universe and which are not ;)
[04:56] <stefanct> antarus: there is no simple answer (i think)... the process of getting new packages in is described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages that does also apply to DEs i guess...
[05:26] <micahg> MikeRL: look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Triaging#Package_Classification
[05:27] <MikeRL> OK, thanks. I will bookmark this.
[05:34] <MikeRL> I looked through the Xorg log I uploaded, and cannot find anything. Can you? Of must be a generic X bug (non driver related) or a kernel bug.
[05:36] <MikeRL> Now to narrow it down further.
[05:39] <micahg> I'm not really an xorg or kernel person
[05:39] <MikeRL> Do you know who is?
[05:40] <micahg> you might be better off trying in about 6-12 hours
[05:40] <MikeRL> Yeah you work with Mozilla, right?
[05:40] <MikeRL> The Ubuntu Mozilla team.
[05:40] <micahg> MikeRL: well, I'm good with almost anything else
[05:40] <micahg> yeah, I'm tehre
[05:40] <micahg> MikeRL: take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Debugging
[05:42] <MikeRL> Bookmarked it. Should I go and ask the kernel team tomorrow and the X team?
[05:44] <MikeRL> About the bug. And I will be sure to include any debugging info I can get.
[05:45] <TheLordOfTime> micahg's good with backports and MOTU-y thingies
[05:45] <TheLordOfTime> micahg:  oh good while you're here, mysql-workbench
[05:46] <micahg> TheLordOfTime: maybe -motu?
[05:46] <TheLordOfTime> well, not really, just me stating i was told by geser/bdrung to ping upstream... which means another week's wait time to figure out the deps
[05:46] <TheLordOfTime> that's all.  :)
[05:47]  * TheLordOfTime goes back to epic lurk mode
[05:49] <MikeRL> micahg: Thank you for the assistance. I will debug to the best of my ability and get better log files. If I can get to the bottom of this, the bug will be closer to being more easily solved.
[05:50] <micahg> MikeRL: sure, you might have more luck in here later when you're done debugging
[05:51] <MikeRL> Yep. I should be able to figure this out. I'm learning C in my classes, but I want to learn programming on Linux as well. They only teach Visual Studio. That's why I'm fighting to figure this mess out.
[05:52] <MikeRL> Can't have X lock up or the kernel panic during a compile.
[05:53] <MikeRL> And now I'm off.
[07:04] <antarus> TheLordOfTime: you still around?
[07:04] <TheLordOfTime> no
[07:04] <TheLordOfTime> i'm busy digging my head deeper and deeper into the evil that's php5's code base
[07:05] <antarus> ew
[07:05] <TheLordOfTime> (also known as EVIL INSOMNIA)
[07:05] <TheLordOfTime> sup?
[07:05] <antarus> ahh I lied
[07:05] <antarus> I found a doc that mostly explains the answer I was seeking
[07:06] <antarus> you are spared ;p
[07:06] <TheLordOfTime> bleh
[07:06] <TheLordOfTime> i was hoping i would have more of a distraction
[07:06]  * TheLordOfTime goes back to php5's evil codebase :/
[07:14]  * antarus makes a personal launchpad account
[07:43] <antarus> ok I am retarded
[07:43] <antarus> bzr branch lp:lightdm
[07:43] <antarus> is prompting for an ssh key
[07:46] <antarus> ahh scheme = ssh
[07:46] <antarus> must have been something silly I did earlier
[08:06] <TheLordOfTime> just create and uplod one
[08:07] <TheLordOfTime> antarus:  or be overkill like me and make one with 16384 bitstrength...
[08:07] <TheLordOfTime> ... :P
[08:11] <antarus> ecdsa ;p
[08:11] <antarus> glib--
[08:17] <antarus> also lightdm's 'session_child_run' is a 500 line C function
[08:17] <antarus> like seriously?
[08:44] <iceroot> hi
[08:45] <iceroot> is ubuntu-bug not designed to work with packages from the partner-repo? ubuntu-bug acroread is telling me package does not exist, apt-cache policy is showing acroread on the 12.04 partner repo
[10:27] <freakynl> Any officials in here? It appears bugs I report in launchpad don't get solved. I posted one many months ago and it's still 'NEW', which doesn't give me much hope for the one I reported yesterday
[10:27] <freakynl> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/targetcli/+bug/1021785 <- reported on 6 July 2012! Still new...
[10:27] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1021785 in targetcli (Ubuntu) "targetcli does not recognize md partitions as block devices" [Undecided,New]
[10:27] <freakynl> Now that's a pretty nasty one tho'
[10:28] <freakynl> This one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/targetcli/+bug/1111852 however is pretty simple. With link to discussion on iscsi-target list + links to patch from the dev
[10:28] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 1111852 in targetcli (Ubuntu) "targetcli bug - buffered fileio mode not saved across reboots" [Undecided,New]