[10:56] <ogra> grrr, cadejo seems to have died again
[10:57] <ogra> this is getting tiring
[11:00] <elmo> https://pastebin.canonical.com/83700/
[11:00] <elmo> want me to reboot it?
[11:18] <ogra> elmo, (sorry had to find a 2fa capable machine first) ... intrestingly the webserver seems still active
[11:19] <ogra> elmo, and yes, reboot it and lets see what comes out
[11:23] <elmo> ogra: back up
[11:23] <ogra> gracias :)
[13:51] <roaksoax> howdy! I mistakenly uploaded 'maas' to precise (which in reality was meant for PPA). Could someone please reject it ? Thank you!
[13:52] <cjwatson> roaksoax: done
[13:53] <roaksoax> cjwatson: thank you!!
[14:15] <ogra> infinity, in case you didnt notice btw, cadejo was dead again this morning
[14:15] <ogra> (runs again, was rebooted, but had a kernel oops in the logs)
[14:15] <infinity> ogra: Yeah, so I saw in scrollback.  elmo's paste was worrisome.
[14:16] <ogra> yup
[14:16] <infinity> ogra: I suspect it's not actually a kernel bug but a hardware issue, but you could ask paolo to look at it.
[14:16] <ogra> i really wonder if someone checked the power supplies of all these free floating pandas
[14:17] <ogra> seems only the ones not in the mandabox have these probs
[14:34] <infinity> ogra: The MandaBox pandas have plenty of problems too, hate to burst your bubble. :)
[14:34] <ogra> *sniff*
[14:35] <ogra> cromebooks FTW !
[14:35] <elmo> don't get me started on the MandaBox pandas.  or the state of arm HW we have in general.
[14:35] <ogra> yeah ...
[14:36] <ogra> 10 chromebooks with USB 3.0 flash drives, a belt and a power stip and you have something better i guess
[14:36] <ogra> *strip
[14:37] <infinity> s/flash/rotary/ unless you want someone replacing them every 3 weeks.  There's also the small part where we don't have anything remotely resembling a supported kernel for them.
[14:38] <ogra> i thought we have it in universe since last week ?
[14:38] <ogra> (indeed not supported)
[14:47] <smoser> Daviey, with your release team hat on, please consider this notification that the Ubuntu Server team plans on opt'ing in to Alpha-2 for cloud-images and for server ISOs.
[14:49] <cjwatson> Eh, I thought Canonical teams were opting out
[14:49] <infinity> Yeah...
[16:43] <infinity> cjwatson: New d-i in the proposed queue, BTW.
[16:44] <infinity> cjwatson: (For precise)
[16:47] <cjwatson> thanks
[16:48] <cjwatson> please update the seeds (now or shortly)
[16:48] <infinity> cjwatson: I was going to do that after it was built, but yeah.  Not forgetting this time. :P
[16:48]  * cjwatson nods
[18:29] <infinity> slangasek: That yui3 in precise/new should be rejected, right?
[18:30] <slangasek> infinity: that was my recommendation to andresrl, but you may want to check with him to make sure that's the way they're going
[18:31] <infinity> slangasek: I think I saw some MPs fly by implementing your recommendation to just ship what they need in debian.tar.gz.
[18:31] <slangasek> perfect
[18:33] <infinity> Though, I don't see it in their branch...
[18:34] <infinity> slangasek: You may want to provide a review of https://code.launchpad.net/~andreserl/maas/precise.sru.jslibs/+merge/146252 to see if it meets your recommendations.
[18:35] <slangasek> infinity: as long as it's not a separate package that we have to support external interfaces on, it does
[18:39] <infinity> cjwatson: I think you want 1.9.1 for quantal instead of 1.9ubuntu0.1
[18:40] <infinity> cjwatson: Your + versioning scheme exploded uncleverly. :)
[18:41] <infinity> (base)adconrad@cthulhu:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.9ubuntu0.1+2.00-7ubuntu11 gt 1.9+2.00-7ubuntu11 && echo Yep || echo Nope
[18:41] <cjwatson> I guess.  Want a reupload?
[18:41] <infinity> Nope
[18:41] <infinity> (base)adconrad@cthulhu:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.9.1+2.00-7ubuntu11 gt 1.9+2.00-7ubuntu11 && echo Yep || echo Nope
[18:41] <infinity> Yep
[18:41] <cjwatson> (It'll be after dinner if so)
[18:41] <infinity> cjwatson: Well, the current one failed to upload, so yes.
[18:41] <cjwatson> Ah, OK
[18:41] <cjwatson> In a couple of hours then
[19:24] <ogra> infinity, hmm, my nexus7 build never returned on nusakan
[19:24] <ogra> could you take a look, i suspect there is a lockfile hanging around again
[19:25] <infinity> ogra: Probably ever since the reboot, yes.  You probably should have asked elmo to clean up before you went firing off builds.
[19:26] <ogra> yeah, i gforgot
[19:26] <ogra> gotfor
[19:26] <ogra> gorfod
[19:26] <ogra> or so
[19:29] <elmo> removed the lock
[19:30] <infinity> elmo: Were there a bunch of "oli's impatient" BuildLiveCD processes, or just the one?
[19:32] <elmo> two of them
[19:32] <elmo> one is running now, the other is pending
[19:32] <infinity> If you want to kill the one spinning on the lock, life should be good.
[19:33] <elmo> done
[19:34] <infinity> Many thanks.
[19:34] <ogra> heh, noticed
[19:34]  * ogra has his shell back on nusakan
[19:34] <ogra> and sorry again, i'll not forget next time ...
[19:35] <infinity> Or buildd@cadejo could have an @reboot crontab to rm the lock.
[19:35] <infinity> And no one would ever forget again.
[19:35] <infinity> ogra: Anyhow, looks like there's a daily build running right now, so no need for you to overlap. :)
[19:35] <ogra> yeah
[19:36] <ogra> mine would have been done by the time the regular one would have started
[19:36] <ogra> now there is no need anymore
[20:35] <ogasawara> cjwatson: hi, I've started to edit the 12.04.2 release notes.  I'm noticing some of the information on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrecisePangolin/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuDesktop is pulled in from PrecisePangolin/ReleaseNotes/CommonInfrastructure  .  However, it appears the archived 12.04.1 release notes also includes references to this same PrecisePangolin/ReleaseNotes/CommonInfrastructure location.  Would you like me to create
[20:35] <ogasawara> a CommonInfrastructure-12.04.1 snapshot (and update the 12.04.1 release notes) before I proceed making changes?
[20:37] <cjwatson> ogasawara: Oh, I missed that.  Yes please
[20:37] <cjwatson> ogasawara: use moin's CopyPage operation
[20:37] <ogasawara> cjwatson: ack, will do
[22:51] <cjwatson> infinity: I can haz another debian-installer/precise?
[22:57] <antarus> can I has the unity 24 day reboot fix? ;p
[22:57] <antarus> the bug said it was uploaded to proposed, but I haz not seen it
[23:04] <cjwatson> Hmm, curious; it's still in the queue.  Do you need it on the installation media, or just in the archive?
[23:05] <cjwatson> Accepted now.
[23:12] <antarus> cjwatson: I just need it in the archive so I can pull it in ahead of the SRU
[23:12] <antarus> thanks!
[23:13] <antarus> you rock (as always)
[23:14] <cjwatson> OK, should be there for you now
[23:14] <cjwatson> Well, pending builds
[23:15] <cjwatson> May not actually be in 12.04.2 as such due to timing
[23:15]  * cjwatson verifies a bunch of "does this install" SRUs in schroots
[23:16] <antarus> I don't think we care if it is in .2
[23:23] <phillw> antarus: so they have 24 days before it does not boot?
[23:24] <antarus> phillw: ?
[23:24] <antarus> phillw: every 24 days the icons disappear from teh launcher
[23:24] <antarus> and they have to reboot
[23:25] <antarus> they hate rebooting
[23:25] <antarus> a lot
[23:25] <phillw> I'm guessing people with LTS would be less than pleased :) They do like UP-TIMR :D
[23:25] <cjwatson> It's certainly a nasty bug
[23:25] <phillw> *UP-TIME*
[23:26] <antarus> its not so much uptime as mere interruptions
[23:26] <antarus> I mean just relaunching eclipse...
[23:26] <antarus>  ;)
[23:27] <phillw> all my icons vansish and I need to reboot... I'd call that UP-TIME, sorry, I'm just having a bad night with 'little bugs' and am heartened by one slightly larger. It is very wrong of me to take heart that there are more critical ones out there. I do apologise.
[23:28] <antarus> most of the bugs we file are crappy and stupid, and we don't care if they are SRU'd ;p
[23:28] <antarus> I imagine no one runs Ubuntu quite like we do
[23:34] <phillw> antarus: I can assure you that no one runs Lubuntu quite the way I do :D
[23:35] <antarus> heh
[23:35] <antarus> we still have nfs automounted homedirectories, kerberos, and other 'enterprise' crap
[23:35] <antarus> but soon
[23:35] <phillw> It is a sterling statement to stability of the kernel that the guys and gals actually get out for us :)
[23:35] <antarus> soon it will all be gone
[23:36] <antarus> oh don't worry, we have our own crappy kernel ;p
[23:38] <phillw> My passion is removing encrypted home directories, and making them on their own partition... but, meh... I'd have to be richer for SABDFL to get that change done. As for things like kerberos, I'm agnostic.