george_e | I've uploaded a build of GCC 4.7 for Precise to a PPA but when other packages in the PPA build, they are still using GCC 4.6. | 01:23 |
---|---|---|
george_e | Here is a link to the PPA: https://code.launchpad.net/~george-edison55/+archive/nitroshare-dev | 01:23 |
george_e | ...and here is a build that failed because GCC 4.6 is still being pulled in: https://code.launchpad.net/~george-edison55/+archive/nitroshare-dev/+build/4274624/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.nitroshare_0.3-0%7E201302050803%7Eprecise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 01:24 |
StevenK | You probably need gcc-defaults to make sure it pulls in 4.7 | 01:24 |
wgrant | george_e: Have you also uploaded gcc-defaults ? | 01:24 |
wgrant | What StevenK said | 01:24 |
george_e | Ah. | 01:25 |
george_e | I will backport that and see if it helps. | 01:25 |
=== Logan_ is now known as Guest95244 | ||
=== Logan__ is now known as Logan_ | ||
dbm | Hello guys, how can i get ssh key for lunchpad on osx ? 10.8? | 08:39 |
dbm | launch* | 08:39 |
Mkaysi | dbm: ssh-keygen should work with it too. | 10:42 |
dbm | Mkaysi: solved it | 10:49 |
Mkaysi | :) | 10:50 |
=== matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
=== slank_away is now known as slank | ||
vibhav | Is anybody here knowing whether test cases using X11 will work with launchpad? | 15:08 |
geser | vibhav: you might need probably "xvfb" for that | 15:12 |
vibhav | geser: What is that? | 15:14 |
geser | Description-en: Virtual Framebuffer 'fake' X server | 15:14 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
vibhav | geser: thanks | 15:32 |
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
vibhav | Does Launchpad allow root privilages on its build servers? | 17:40 |
tsimpson | fakeroot, not real root | 17:41 |
vibhav | tsimpson: A test case here needs Xvfb which needs root to run | 17:41 |
vibhav | tsimpson: And for Xvfb to function without root, one needs to chmod u+s the Xvfb binary, which requires root too :( | 17:43 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
tsimpson | maybe you can disable the test cases on the build | 17:44 |
tsimpson | not exactly a solution, but... | 17:45 |
vibhav | tsimpson: I am writing the autopkgtest cases | 17:46 |
vibhav | http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/auto-pkg-test.html | 17:46 |
tsimpson | hmm, then I'd suggest filing a question and seeing what the LP admins suggest | 17:47 |
vibhav | sure, thanks | 17:47 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
geser | vibhav: there are several packages that build-depend on xvfb. If I not mistaken they use it for some build tests. Perhaps you could check how they manage to use xvfb on the buildds. | 18:58 |
geser | packages like apport, bamf, indicator-appmenu, libgtk2-perl and others | 19:00 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
dobey | eh? xvfb doesn't need root to run | 19:10 |
dobey | "xvfb-run -a yourscript" | 19:10 |
geser | dobey: vibhav got this already resolved in #ubuntu-devel (it was a internet page with wrong information) | 19:12 |
dobey | ah | 19:14 |
=== epsy is now known as \u03b5 | ||
=== Guest19155 is now known as LoganCloud | ||
thomi | Hi - I'm using a recipe to build some debian packages, and it looks to me like the builder is building into the wrong PPA. Is it possible to cancel the builds & delete the packages that have been published from the PPA? | 23:30 |
wgrant | thomi: Which build? | 23:31 |
thomi | wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomir/+recipe/cegui-daily | 23:31 |
thomi | wgrant: I just found the "delete packages" link in the PPA | 23:31 |
thomi | I have no idea how it selected that PPA - other than it's at the top of the list of PPAs I have access to | 23:31 |
wgrant | thomi: You must have left the default selected when you requested the builds | 23:32 |
wgrant | It is a rather unfortunate default, but that's the only real possibility for what happened | 23:32 |
TheLordOfTime | what's the upper bound on resources a PPA builder can have for any given build? | 23:32 |
thomi | wgrant: when I request the build it defails to what I've configured in the recipe though | 23:32 |
thomi | wgrant: is there a way to cancel the incorrect builds? or should I just wait it out... | 23:33 |
wgrant | TheLordOfTime: What's interesting about the *upper* bound of available resources? | 23:33 |
wgrant | The lower bound is surely all that is relevant | 23:33 |
TheLordOfTime | wgrant: wondering whether libreoffice'll build. | 23:33 |
wgrant | thomi: Normally, yes, but that's a non-virt PPA so the builds can't be cancelled. | 23:33 |
TheLordOfTime | wgrant: need to build-test to see if a newer dep will break it, and i don't have pbuilder around to do it. | 23:34 |
TheLordOfTime | (not enough resources!) | 23:34 |
thomi | wgrant: :( okay, thanks for your help | 23:34 |
wgrant | TheLordOfTime: The main constraint with some libreoffice builds is that they use >30GB of disk space, which some of our builders cannot support | 23:34 |
TheLordOfTime | ... lolwut? | 23:35 |
TheLordOfTime | it uses 30GB of disk space to build? | 23:35 |
wgrant | Yes | 23:35 |
TheLordOfTime | o.O | 23:35 |
wgrant | It's a pretty horrible package | 23:35 |
wgrant | I think it may be better now | 23:35 |
wgrant | But a few months ago it was a serious issue | 23:35 |
TheLordOfTime | of that you and I are agreed, but as a sync-request is dependent on testing the build, well... | 23:35 |
TheLordOfTime | because the sync is for a dep of the raring libreoffice, and it needs to work with the newer dep. | 23:36 |
TheLordOfTime | if it doesn't, it will cancel two other sync-requests | 23:36 |
TheLordOfTime | which is fine, but... | 23:36 |
* TheLordOfTime yawns | 23:36 | |
TheLordOfTime | you know what, i shouldn't be build-testing when i'm tired anyways | 23:36 |
TheLordOfTime | i'm likely to break the debian/control file :P | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!