| bryce | hum, there's an ickle in our bug tracker | 01:59 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | yeah | 04:49 |
| Sarvatt | bryce: you didn't notice him pinging us about things? maybe because he only pings tjaalton now :) but yeah it's much appreciated | 05:02 |
| bryce | yeah didn't see any pings much | 08:17 |
| bryce | works for me; I got sick of forwarding all those bugs to bugzilla | 08:18 |
| tjaalton | whoa, still four weeks until the feature freeze | 09:35 |
| mlankhorst | :o | 10:42 |
| mlankhorst | plenty of time to get unity through then | 11:15 |
| tjaalton | yup | 11:17 |
| tjaalton | and mesa :) | 11:17 |
| tjaalton | slash llvm | 11:17 |
| mlankhorst | yeah llvm is the blocker atm | 11:17 |
| tjaalton | doko doesn't seem to be around.. | 11:18 |
| tjaalton | maybe I'll just create the snapshot and we can bikeshed it later | 11:18 |
| mlankhorst | sure | 11:20 |
| mlankhorst | could you do a patch to debian/rules for libLLVM-3.2.so too? | 11:21 |
| tjaalton | for the snapshot, not mesa? | 11:21 |
| mlankhorst | yeah seems like a packaging error | 11:22 |
| mlankhorst | looks like we will also need a newer dh-exec in precise to build it | 11:28 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| mlankhorst | tjaalton: first stab at fixing things, pending build.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/1616315/ | 12:19 |
| mlankhorst | probably messed up with email address | 12:20 |
| tjaalton | mlankhorst: thanks. so the r600 tree is based on 3.2, so it should be possible to create a (huge) diff that just pulls the backend.. | 12:23 |
| mlankhorst | yeah needs to be ubuntu-devel-discuss@ubuntu.com | 12:23 |
| mlankhorst | but agreed, big diff ought to be reasonable for now, maybe package llvm-3.3 snapshot too before freeze, then choose which one we want to keep closer to 9.1 release? | 12:24 |
| tjaalton | i guess it's easier to go the diff route | 12:29 |
| mlankhorst | yeah but would be nice if we could reach to an agreement with doko about it | 12:30 |
| tjaalton | of course | 12:31 |
| tjaalton | upstream doesn't seem to use tags, or they don't work on the git mirror | 12:45 |
| mlankhorst | probably using svn | 12:45 |
| tjaalton | yep | 12:45 |
| mlankhorst | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1616523/ fixed version that worksforme (TM) | 12:57 |
| tjaalton | why did you touch the source-building target? | 13:05 |
| mlankhorst | because it was upset at my quiltrc file | 13:06 |
| tjaalton | what would be the changelog entry for the symlink?-) | 13:07 |
| tjaalton | I'll create an "official" debdiff for doko | 13:08 |
| tjaalton | adding the r600 backend was a breeze | 13:08 |
| mlankhorst | erm something like "remove extra libLLVM-3.2.so.1 installed by llvm-3.2-dev" | 13:08 |
| mlankhorst | and "add libLLVM-3.2.so symlink to /usr/lib/llvm-3.2/lib to satisfy programs expecting it to be there (mesa)" | 13:09 |
| tjaalton | ok, building | 13:10 |
| tjaalton | bah | 13:11 |
| tjaalton | forgot to enable the backend | 13:13 |
| mlankhorst | :-) | 13:13 |
| tjaalton | --enable-experimental-targets=R600 | 13:13 |
| mlankhorst | but is the diff isolated to just adding the extra target, then? | 13:15 |
| tjaalton | yes | 13:16 |
| tjaalton | http://pastebin.com/Ld5stjBa :) | 13:19 |
| tjaalton | or rather http://pastebin.com/ygUcWEaF | 13:20 |
| tjaalton | diffing tstellars master to release_32 | 13:21 |
| tjaalton | pinged sylvestre to hear what he thinks about adding the patch.. | 13:24 |
| tjaalton | built fine btw | 13:25 |
| mlankhorst | hm to sru mesa 9.0.2 I would have to revert a whole bunch of wayland patches | 13:30 |
| mlankhorst | seems to be easier if I could just disable wayland altogether | 13:30 |
| mlankhorst | oh it built | 13:41 |
| mlankhorst | git diff a5776ac0b8c015bf5d6a8513cefec5920895cc8e^ src/egl/wayland/ src/egl/drivers/dri2/*wayland* src/gallium/state_trackers/egl/wayland/ src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h | patch -Rp1 | 13:41 |
| tjaalton | should I upload llvm to x-staging? | 13:43 |
| mlankhorst | sure, for raring I guess? | 13:44 |
| tjaalton | yup | 13:45 |
| mlankhorst | shall I push my WIP for mesa 9.0.2 sru to ubuntu-quantal branch? | 13:55 |
| tjaalton | yup | 13:55 |
| mlankhorst | done | 13:56 |
| mlankhorst | just need to find some bug as justification, or maybe I should file one and find an excuse to play supreme commander for a few hours | 13:58 |
| mlankhorst | ;P | 13:58 |
| mlankhorst | bryce: since you were running piglit tests before, what is the setup you use to check for regressions between micro releases? | 13:59 |
| mlankhorst | argh stupid game won't crash! need another testcase now | 14:36 |
| tjaalton | wth again https://launchpadlibrarian.net/130535383/upload_4278734_log.txt | 14:55 |
| mlankhorst | 6 mar? | 15:32 |
| tjaalton | huh | 15:33 |
| mlankhorst | from that log | 15:33 |
| tjaalton | so it is my machine | 15:33 |
| tjaalton | shit | 15:33 |
| tjaalton | how did that happen.. | 15:34 |
| mlankhorst | did you suspend a few times? I had it live a year in the future with that sometimes | 15:34 |
| tjaalton | hibernate | 15:34 |
| mlankhorst | guessing that's possibly why :-) | 15:35 |
| tjaalton | great, git histories messed up then | 15:36 |
| tjaalton | hum, so canonical-x staging ppa has the arm builders set up, so perhaps it's best to use that one instead.. | 16:02 |
| mlankhorst | you can get arm builders on your own ppa if you awnt | 16:10 |
| tjaalton | well this is one hassle less | 16:10 |
| tjaalton | pushed llvm there, fixed timestamps first | 16:15 |
| tjaalton | should upload fine now.. | 16:15 |
| tjaalton | cleaned canonical-x/staging from old packages | 18:14 |
| bryce | mlankhorst, piglit includes a script that lets you chart several runs together, that's really all I've been using to do comparisons. I probably should get something a bit more structured set up... some day. | 18:24 |
| mlankhorst | :/ | 18:46 |
| bryce | mlankhorst, what exactly are you looking for? | 18:51 |
| mlankhorst | some structured way to run tests for mesa 9.0 against mesa 9.0.2 for sru'ing to quantal | 18:51 |
| bryce | mlankhorst, this is basically what I use: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1617512/ | 18:54 |
| bryce | then like I said, I do the comparisons by running that other command manually | 18:55 |
| bryce | mlankhorst, the original script I was using is http://paste.ubuntu.com/1617523/, but just runs one test | 18:59 |
| bryce | Sarvatt, to set up an xorg-server 1.14 ppa, what all needs done? Will we need the protos and so on too? Can we just use the edgers scripts to do the snapshot? | 19:03 |
| tjaalton | bryce: we already have the ppa | 19:08 |
| tjaalton | canonical-x/staging | 19:08 |
| tjaalton | it has arm builders and all | 19:08 |
| tjaalton | pushed llvm for mesa there, not sure if that gets in the archive or not | 19:08 |
| tjaalton | and it only needs to carry the server & drivers | 19:09 |
| bryce | tjaalton, ah thanks | 19:09 |
| tjaalton | protos, libs (if any) we can push to raring | 19:09 |
| Sarvatt | inputproto and libxi should be all that needs updating besides xserver | 19:09 |
| tjaalton | yeah | 19:09 |
| bryce | tjaalton, ah I mean I'm looking for xserver in particular | 19:09 |
| tjaalton | mlankhorst has tested some rc already, not pushed anywhere yet | 19:10 |
| mlankhorst | build tested | 19:11 |
| tjaalton | ship it | 19:11 |
| tjaalton | no commits upstream since jan 23rd | 19:11 |
| tjaalton | keithp has been travelling | 19:11 |
| bryce | looks like we're mostly caught up on the proto packages that have been released, so I guess unless they depend on changes only in git, we should be ok? | 19:12 |
| bryce | we have inputproto 2.2.99.1 already, libxi could be updated | 19:13 |
| tjaalton | oh we had that | 19:13 |
| Sarvatt | yeah whoops, just uploaded inputproto to the ppa too :P | 19:13 |
| bryce | oh that's not supposed to be in raring? | 19:14 |
| tjaalton | just delete it :) | 19:14 |
| tjaalton | no harm having it in raring.. | 19:14 |
| bryce | ok | 19:14 |
| Sarvatt | doing libxi now | 19:15 |
| bryce | has someone already snapshotted xserver? We going to use what's in the ubuntu+1 branch currently, or update to a newer snapshot? | 19:16 |
| tjaalton | need newer | 19:18 |
| bryce | it's from Jan 9th, so fairly new | 19:18 |
| bryce | ah ok | 19:18 |
| tjaalton | bumps xi minor version etc | 19:20 |
| tjaalton | and major too.. | 19:22 |
| tjaalton | err, input abi I mean | 19:22 |
| tjaalton | 35 commits since then | 19:23 |
| Sarvatt | xi's up there, doing xserver now | 19:30 |
| tjaalton | use git too.. | 19:30 |
| tjaalton | :) | 19:30 |
| tjaalton | because we'd be able to then binary copy the packages straight to raring | 19:32 |
| Sarvatt | well hell, i thought we just wanted a testing ppa | 19:32 |
| tjaalton | so same standards apply :) | 19:32 |
| tjaalton | we can have both! :) | 19:33 |
| tjaalton | at the same time | 19:33 |
| tjaalton | maybe there was some miscommunication then, sorry :/ | 19:35 |
| bryce | hum, I'm trying to understand how raof's pointer barrier velocity changes got taken upstream, but am having trouble seeing it. It appears no one gave review comments on the patches upstream, and I don't see anything relating to velocity in the current xfixes/cursor.c. What am I missing? | 19:48 |
| bryce | is it possible we are going to need to keep the patch and forward port it? | 19:48 |
| tjaalton | haven't looked | 19:49 |
| * bryce looks harder | 19:51 | |
| bryce | ah? http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-June/031647.html | 19:52 |
| bryce | ok, it's there. s/velocity/dx,dy/ and so on :-) | 20:09 |
| tjaalton | maybe just ask jasper/peter :) | 20:09 |
| tjaalton | ah | 20:09 |
| bryce | yep, found everything I needed. | 20:19 |
| tjaalton | Sarvatt: I've cherry-picked your commits to u+1 to d-e ;) | 22:02 |
| tjaalton | libxi uploaded to raring | 22:12 |
| bryce | tjaalton, need help with anything? | 23:01 |
| mlankhorst | sleeping, I would imagine :-) | 23:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!