| stgraber | slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1622593/ | 23:36 |
|---|---|---|
| slangasek | whee :) | 23:38 |
| slangasek | stgraber: how many extra processes do we have running now, that weren't before? (thinking of memory footprint) | 23:39 |
| slangasek | it's init --user + upstart-event-bridge, and that's it? | 23:39 |
| stgraber | slangasek: should be just two, yeah | 23:39 |
| * slangasek nods | 23:39 | |
| slangasek | do we expect gnome-session to go away in the near term? | 23:39 |
| stgraber | that'd be more a question for desktop I guess, but I don't think it's going to disappear this cycle and I have my doubt about the next one too | 23:40 |
| slangasek | stgraber: because you don't think we'll have the subprocesses transitioned over, or because you think we still need other features of gnome-session? | 23:44 |
| stgraber | well, I'm not completely sure of what gnome-session actually does. It does seem to spawn a ton of stuff, so we'll basically need to look at every single thing it spawns and translate that into an upstart job | 23:45 |
| slangasek | yeah | 23:46 |
| slangasek | but that's fairly mechanical work | 23:46 |
| slangasek | I'm more concerned about things like the dbus services gnome-session provides | 23:46 |
| stgraber | I'm not sure it actually provides any dbus service itself, it spawns a ton of stuff that do though | 23:47 |
| stgraber | I guess I can do a quick test with just spawning gnome-settings-daemon and compiz myself, see what I miss if I skip gnome-session entirely | 23:48 |
| stgraber | slangasek: with just those two, I'm missing nautilus (no background) and I'm missing all the indicators (not sure what's actually spawning those usually...) | 23:53 |
| stgraber | the rest looks good though ;) | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!