/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/02/08/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

=== zz_Jacky_ is now known as jackyalcine
=== jackyalcine is now known as Jacky_
=== Jacky_ is now known as zz_Jacky_
=== zz_Jacky_ is now known as jackyalcine
=== jackyalcine is now known as Jacky_
=== jbicha is now known as Guest80174
=== Guest80174 is now known as jbicha_
=== Jacky_ is now known as zz_Jacky_
=== zz_Jacky_ is now known as jackyalcine
=== jackyalcine is now known as Jacky_
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
pittitkamppeter_: "Only long keyids (v4, 160bit) are supported", ah, that indeed explains it05:28
pittiGood morning05:28
larsupitti, good morning :)05:29
pittilarsu: oh right -- crazy times for you now :)05:29
larsupitti, ya, at least I see you get up now!05:29
attentelarsu_: ping05:30
larsu_attente: pong05:31
=== Jacky_ is now known as zz_Jacky_
=== zz_Jacky_ is now known as jackyalcine
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
BigWhaleGood Morning06:15
didrocksgood morning06:23
BigWhalegood morning didrocks :)06:38
didrockshey BigWhale, how are you?06:39
BigWhaleI'm up from 6am ... that's how I am :))06:39
BigWhaleRight now contemplating what is the acceptable number of bugs for a 'stable' release. :)06:40
didrocksheh ;)06:42
BigWhaleThat's not funny! :P06:46
BigWhale:))06:46
didrocksit is, before coffee and you start to realize what this really means ;)06:49
BigWhaleI don't drink coffe. :/06:53
didrockstea works for caffein ;)06:54
jibelgood morning07:34
robruhmmmmmmm... what is the Vala equivalent of python's unittest.assertRaises?07:34
didrockshey jibel, morning/evening robru!07:39
robruhey didrocks !07:40
jibelbonjour didrocks07:40
BigWhaleWhich window manager is used in gnome-session-fallback?07:44
didrocksmetacity07:49
BigWhaleis there a way to turn on compositing in metacity?07:50
BigWhaleor make a window transparent in non-compositing WM's?07:51
mitya57BigWhale: gsettings set org.gnome.metacity compositing-manager true07:52
mitya57btw there is also gnome-fallback-comits session07:52
mitya57*gnome-fallback-compiz07:52
BigWhalemitya57, thanks.07:53
BigWhaleWhy is it off anyway?07:54
BigWhaleperformance wise?07:54
didrocksBigWhale: doesn't work well if you don't have accelerated drivers07:55
didrocksstill work, but can be slower and have artefacts07:55
=== jackyalcine is now known as zz_jackyalcine
Laneyfriiiiiday09:04
didrocksyeeeeep ;)09:09
didrocksqtdays!09:10
LaneyO RLY09:11
BigWhaleI abandoned Qt when KDE4 was released for the first time. :)09:24
Riddelldidrocks: what what?09:45
popeympt: got another potentially not helpful update-manager dialog today... http://popey.com/~alan/untrusted.png  "This requires installing packages from unauthenticated sources" (I know the reason, I have a PPA which I didn't add the key for)09:45
chrisccoulsongood morning09:46
didrockshey Riddell, sorry, was disconnected, didn't receive your first message :)09:46
popeympt: if you run "apt-get upgrade" then the similar warning is presented as just that, a warning, with the option of pressing "yes" to allow it. update manager offers no option to ignore the warning.09:46
didrocks(sharing screen in hangout made xorg crashing)09:46
Riddelldidrocks: I only got "qtdays" does this mean you have some plans for qt today?09:46
didrocksRiddell: the plan than Mirv talk to you about with Qt 509:47
didrocksRiddell: so qtchooser + qt4 compatible with qt5 paths09:47
didrocksand we start to upload an initial version qt5, reviewing under way09:47
Riddelldidrocks: I'm wanting to wait until KDE 4.10 is in before that gets uploaded09:47
didrocks(the version that was acked with debian as well)09:47
Riddellcos I suspect they'll clash somewhat09:47
didrocksRiddell: you mean, the qt5 part?09:48
Riddelldidrocks: well qtchooser and qt4-x11 changes, but I think qt5 will depend on that09:48
didrocksRiddell: the qt4 with qtchooser it uploaded (qt4 in binary NEW I guess for the -default package) and qtchooser in source NEW09:48
didrocksis*09:49
Riddelldidrocks: ah good old New queue :)09:49
didrocksheh :)09:49
Riddelldidrocks: KDE SC 4.10 is all done except for smelly old powerpc being slow09:49
didrocksRiddell: ah ok, no new package? I doubt qt4-x11 will be built on powerpc before the kde pieces on powerpc are built?09:50
Riddellno new in 4.1009:50
didrocksok, I thought that's what you meant once you wanted KDE 4.10 first ;) so we're all good09:51
didrocksRiddell: qt4-x11 won't be publish anyway before the new -default package is NEWed09:51
didrocksand I guess powerpc will finish before qt4-x11 powerpc starts even09:51
didrocksfinished*09:51
didrockslet's keep qtchooser in source NEW as well until the powerpc builds ends09:51
didrocksRiddell: works for you?09:52
Riddelldidrocks: qt4 seems to have started on powerpc, how did it skip the queue?!09:52
didrocksRiddell: hum, you're right, crap :/ is it a priority main/universe?09:53
didrocksRiddell: I didn't request anything FYI, no score bump09:53
Riddelldidrocks: oh that's probably it09:53
didrocksRiddell: normally, headers are not impacted, it's just binaries that are moving09:53
didrocksRiddell: so, hopefully, you can still publish kde, even on powerpc if built against the new qt4-x1109:53
Laneyyou could have someone kill the build09:54
Riddelldidrocks: since powerpc is not something we should care about I wonder if it's sensible to just tell the proposed migration to ignore the kde packages09:54
mptpopey, bug report please09:54
didrocksRiddell: I would +1 on that TBH, but I guess that the tool won't be able to copy powerpc after the fact and will rebuilt it09:54
didrocksor just do what Laney is proposing, killing the build09:55
Riddellthe qt build?09:55
didrocksfor powerpc09:55
Riddellok I'll ask for that09:55
Laneywhy is it a problem?09:55
Laneysurely any problem you'll hit at the next upload anyway09:56
didrocksLaney: it's not really, we are just moving some binaries and renaming them for being compatible with the incoming qt509:56
didrocksso no header change09:56
didrocksLaney: but Riddell wants to publish KDE 4.10 first to have a separate change tests, I guess09:56
popeympt: ok09:56
didrocks(understandbly, don't mix potential issues ;))09:56
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr_
didrocksRiddell: which package should I look at to tell "yeah, everything is built on powerpc"?10:02
didrockseverything == KDE 4.1010:02
Riddelldidrocks: everything beginning with a k? :)10:03
didrocksRiddell: well, do you have a control tower for that? ;-)10:03
Riddelldidrocks: what's one of those?10:04
popeympt done, bug 111924710:04
ubot2Launchpad bug 1119247 in update-manager (Ubuntu) ""This requires installing packages from unauthenticated sources" warning not useful" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/111924710:04
didrocksRiddell: I meant, do you have a one single page to check that powerpc on everything starting with a k ended?10:04
* didrocks wonders why again he can't access to https://launchpad.net/builders10:04
Riddelldidrocks: I'm watching http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html10:04
Riddellalthough haskall is getting in the way of making it quick to read10:05
didrocksRiddell: oh, good hint!10:05
didrocksRiddell: thanks, will look at that :)10:05
didrocksso many haskell* package, I blame Laney!10:05
Laneymuhahah10:06
didrocks:p10:07
czajkowskididrocks: private receipe build going on so untul thats gone you wont be able to see it10:08
didrocksczajkowski: isn't it written normally just "private build" for those?10:08
didrocksI saw that sometimes, without details, just "private build"10:09
czajkowskididrocks: sometimes but wgrants says this is normal10:09
Laneythat's private package builds10:09
Laneyslightly different10:09
didrockshum, interested in more details now ;)10:09
czajkowskididrocks: poke wgrant :)10:10
Laneythere's probably a bug on it10:10
Laneyhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/76030310:10
ubot2Ubuntu bug 760303 in Launchpad itself "builders page inaccessible if a private recipe build is building" [High,Triaged]10:10
didrocksheh, will do thanks czajkowski, Laney ;)10:11
czajkowskireally need to remove launchpad as a highlight10:11
Laneylies, your interventions are helpful10:12
didrocksindeed, they are :)10:15
seb128chrisccoulson, hey10:24
chrisccoulsonhi seb128, how are you?10:25
seb128chrisccoulson, I'm good thanks, how are you?10:25
seb128happy friday ;-)10:25
chrisccoulsonseb128, yeah, not too bad thanks10:25
seb128chrisccoulson, did you see my libdbusmenu ping yesterday afternoon?10:25
chrisccoulsonbah, friday, i could do with an extra day in the week ;)10:25
chrisccoulsonseb128, what sort of testcase are you after?10:26
seb128chrisccoulson, something that could do a SRU testcase :p10:26
chrisccoulsonseb128, ah, i did wonder :)10:26
seb128I want to SRU the fixes, I'm just unsure that the SRU team will like "run firefox under valgrind"10:26
chrisccoulsonseb128, yeah, i'll see if i can get a testcase that doesn't involve firefox10:26
seb128thanks!10:27
chrisccoulsonyou need a special build to run that under valgrind in any case10:27
seb128don't spend too much work on it anyway10:27
seb128if we don't have a testcase I will go the "just make sure nothing behave wrongly, watch $program memory usage"10:27
seb128way10:27
Laneygruh11:04
Laneydidrocks: so this does introduce failures11:04
Laneythe unversioned qmake seems to have gone/moved11:05
* didrocks looks for the merge request11:07
didrocksLaney: do you have a link for the failure?11:07
Laneyseems from the changelog that I have to BD on qt4-default now?11:07
Laneyit was a local build11:07
Laneyqmake [long list of options] fa11:08
Laneyiled to to execute: No such file or directory11:08
didrocksLaney: ah right, you need qt4-default or qtchooser to chose one11:08
didrocksthe -dev package dep on qt4-default IIRC11:09
didrockslet me check11:09
Laneyso qt5 will start installing just `qmake' I guess? is that expected to work for most packages?11:10
LaneyI think I'll pass --buildsystem=qmake_qt411:12
didrockssorry, was another chat :)11:14
Laneyheh11:15
didrocksone sec, checking something11:15
didrocksindeed, this is an issue in a builder11:15
didrocksI think libqt4-dev should dep on libqt4-default11:15
didrocksor11:16
didrockshum, not that easy :)11:16
didrocksbecause qt4-default and qt5-default conflicts11:16
didrocksqtchooser is the tool to tell "I'm using those dev tools"11:16
Laneyalternatives?11:16
didrocksbeing make_qt411:16
didrocksor qmake_qt511:16
didrocksLaney: debian didn't want alternatives11:16
Laneyhmm11:17
didrocksLaney: they prefered this tool, which is what upstream is supportive for11:17
didrocksmaybe Mirv can give us an hint, he work with them more than I11:17
Mirvyes, upstream recommended and Debian wanted qtchooser, making it unnecessary to continuing patching the sources adding suffixes everywhere and handling alternatives11:22
Laneydo you expect continued build failures due to this?11:23
didrocksMirv: the question I guess is for a simple app, they will build-dep on libqt4-dev and not qt4-default11:23
Mirvit has the new requirement that everything that builds against Qt4 needs to build-dep on qt4-default11:23
LaneyI think this ought to be communicated11:24
didrocksshouldn't rather we have libqt4-dev dep on qt4-default | qt-default11:24
didrocksand qt4-default provides: qt-default?11:24
didrocks(and something similar for qt5)11:24
Mirvthat could be an option. I tried to initiate ideas with pkg-kde but didn't get the topic going.11:25
didrocksLaney: am I crazy or this proposal makes sense to you? ^11:25
didrocks(if so, I would propose we fix that right away)11:25
LaneyI think so, but I don't know the area well enough to be aware of any gotchas11:27
MirvI'm starting a parallel discussion at #debian-qt-kde (oftc)11:27
didrocksMirv: if I have qt4-default installed11:27
didrocksand I run qtchooser11:27
didrocksI can set qt5 as default, right?11:27
didrockswhich screwing up the packages?11:27
didrockswithout*11:28
Mirvdidrocks: yes, you can use any of the methods like export QT_SELECT=qt511:28
Mirvbut only one can be the real default without any parameters or env vars11:28
didrocksMirv: ok, tell me how it goes on #debian-qt-kde, I think we should do those for qt4 before the week-end11:28
Mirvlet's see if anyone is around11:28
didrocksthanks :)11:28
=== q__ is now known as Phryq
Laneyunblocking glib; I don't see any new failures from it11:31
Phryqheya guys. Is this a room where Ubuntu desktop-users can ask for help?11:32
mptPhryq, no, this channel is for Ubuntu developers. You can find IRC support and other forums at <http://www.ubuntu.com/support>.11:38
mptAnd a channel list at <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ChannelList>.11:39
czajkowskiPhryq: if you're looking for irc support head to #ubuntu11:42
GunnarHjpitti: Hi Martin; thanks for sponsoring bug 1103547.11:47
ubot2Launchpad bug 1103547 in language-selector (Ubuntu) "drag and drop does not work language support not complete" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/110354711:47
Mirvdidrocks: some talk now how most packages should be using qmake-qt4 which is still available..11:48
Mirvwas there some package that already failed to build?11:48
LaneyMirv: that's not what debhelper calls11:48
Laneysee /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/qmake.pm11:48
pittihey GunnarHj, you're welcome! thanks for the fisx11:48
GunnarHjpitti: Just curious about why you use set() instead of 'the good old' []. Is it about efficiency?11:48
pittiGunnarHj: no, but because missing() was previously returning a set11:50
MirvLaney: thanks, using that information11:50
pittiand the new function turned a set into a list11:50
pittiGunnarHj: ^ which broke API; my new test case complained about taht11:50
LaneyMirv: I don't know whether debhelper could in theory be improved to detect which qmake to call11:50
GunnarHjpitti: Aha, then I understand. Thanks for explaining.11:50
Laneyyou might want to use codesearch.debian.net to see how many packages explicitly call unversioned qmake too11:51
Mirv< pinotree> use qmake_qt4, not that11:51
Laneythat's fine to say, but reality might be different11:51
Laneythe fact is debhelper uses that by default so I expect packages do rely on it11:51
pittihey Laney11:52
pittiLaney: I don't see any autopkgtest failures which are due to glib, did you?11:52
Laneypitti: no - I already unblocked it11:53
pittiyay11:54
Laneyand: trying: glib2.011:55
Laneyaccepted: glib2.011:55
Laney\o/11:55
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr_
MirvI'm also mentioning that rcc tool didn't have the suffix in Qt411:59
SuperMattI'm having a bit of a problem... I can't log in to my account on my PC12:00
Mirvwhich means any package using rcc would break without qt4-default12:00
SuperMattit accepts my password, but then goes back to lightdm12:00
SuperMattI'm running raring12:00
seb128SuperMatt, hey, try #ubuntu+1 for user support12:00
SuperMattrighto12:00
Mirvdidrocks: discussion stopped for a moment, but since all in Qt5 is NEW qt5-default requirement would be fine (and we also use it already). I'm trying to get agreement first if qt4-default dependency in libqt4-dev is acceptable. for rcc and debhelper use it seems obvious to me.12:09
LaneyMirv: thanks for following it up12:10
LaneyRiddell: ^ you might want to be aware of this discussion12:10
Mirvthere is also the option of we just doing it for libqt4-dev, since if Debian decides not to follow that route and fixes all Qt4 apps not to require qt4-default, we can sync12:11
Mirvwe're not seeing uploads in Debian any time soon probably anyway because of the upcoming release and NEW queue being deprioritized there12:11
didrocksMirv: ok, thanks :)12:12
didrocksMirv: so we won't change qt5-default12:12
didrocksjust keep compatibility for qt4, right?12:12
Mirvdidrocks: actually for the time being I don't see any downsides of we doing the libqt4-dev dep on qt4-default thing, since it's transparent to drop if everything actually works without?12:12
didrocksMirv: right, want to do it?12:13
Mirvdidrocks: sounds like that currently12:13
didrocksor I can12:13
didrocksactually12:13
Mirvdidrocks: well, feel free, I still haven't had my lunch :(12:13
didrocksMirv: sure, enjoy your lunch then :)12:13
Mirvthe hangout that was supposed to be later started an hour ago12:13
MirvI really try now :)12:13
didrocksurgh, good luck! :)12:13
didrocksLaney: thanks for spotting it! I'm sure there are still some cases in qtchooser that is still not covered, but at least, that shouldn't break the build of qt4 apps12:14
Laneyhmm12:14
didrocksI'm adding as well a recommends from qt4-default on libqt4-dev12:14
Laneyso then you won't be able to develop for qt4 without having it as default12:14
didrocksso that if the way in the future is to use qt5-default, people don't mix it12:15
Laneyi.e. installing qt5-default will actually uninstall libqt4-dev12:15
Laneyis that ok?12:15
didrocksah, good point12:15
didrockshum…12:15
didrocksLaney: ok, I didn't follow this story from the beginning, we can workaround with a recommends for now12:16
Laneybuildds don't install those12:16
didrocksreally? I never knew that12:16
didrockshemf12:16
LaneyPerhaps Depends: qt4-default | qt-default and qt5-default Provides: qt-default is the way to go12:17
Mirvso only the qt5-default providing qt-default as well would allow full conistallability12:17
didrocksLaney: that was my proposal12:17
didrocks12:24:14      didrocks | shouldn't rather we have libqt4-dev dep on qt4-default | qt-default12:17
Laneyyeah12:17
didrocksyeah, let's do that12:17
Laneybut we were coming around to not changing qt512:18
didrockslet's makes it provide qt-default12:18
LaneyI can't currently think of a solution where that's possible though12:18
Mirvone person doesn't like that because qt5-default shouldn't be able to fulfill libqt4-dev dependency, but even though that's a cosmetic issue we don't yet even have the consensus of accepting qt4-default dependency in libqt4-dev, so that's only the next debate12:18
Mirvsorry, I go now, I shouldn't be here..12:18
didrocksLaney: yep, I think that the qtchooser thing was half-thought, I don't even know how if it handles well manually changing the default when one default package is installed12:19
Laneywell, you can think of that dependency as saying that you get qt4 as default by default but if you know what you're doing you can override that12:19
didrocksshould really have been an alternative, not sure why it was rejected12:19
didrocksanyway, let's avoid breaking for now :)12:19
Laneyif Debian decides to reject it it wouldn't be too hard to fix up the packages12:20
didrocksyep :)12:20
didrocksok, it's ready here, waiting for the powerpc build for k* to finish first12:23
didrocksLaney: mind having a look? lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qt/, rev 34912:24
Laneygetting12:25
Laneylooks right12:26
didrocksLaney: thanks ;)12:26
didrocksreuploading qt5 in NEW12:26
Mirvdidrocks: it seems that for now, the Debian qt4 packaging will not be changed, ie. "see what breaks" and even that is only at some point when those start to be uploaded12:32
Mirvthen if it needs to be added, the "qt4-default | qt-default" libqt4-dev dep is more likely than "qt4-default" (where qt5-default would force uninstallation of libqt4-dev) since only one opposes it12:33
didrocksMirv: yeah, I've prepared that for qt4 (waiting for the k* to be built on powerpc) and uploaded the new qt5 with the provides12:34
Mirvsounds good12:35
=== zz_jackyalcine is now known as jackyalcine
=== jackyalcine is now known as Jacky_
=== Jacky_ is now known as zz_jackyalcine
=== larsu_ is now known as larsu
ogra_ah, nice, amliit is in the archive ...13:27
ogra_*maliit13:27
ogra_but it doesnt buy us any ram :(13:28
ogra_Laney, is there any config file or so for it ?13:29
ogra_its pretty small13:29
ogra_seb128, did you set up a meeting agenda for today ? (i was pondering to send an announcement and link to it)13:30
seb128ogra_, no, do you have anything you would like to get on an agenda? should we start creating a wiki page for that?13:31
seb128ogra_, I can send the reminder if you want13:31
ogra_that would be fine, no, nothing for the agenda, you said you wanted one this week, so i thought i'd ask13:31
seb128yeah, and I though about it this morning and I've nothing to put on it :p13:32
ogra_heh, same here13:33
seb128ogra_, I can create a wiki page anyway so we have one and maybe we manage to put stuff on it next time13:33
seb128ogra_, should I send the reminder to ubuntu-devel@ then?13:33
ogra_so lets ignore the agenda (and a wiki for it) until we have something for it13:33
ogra_yeah, i'll post it to G+ then13:33
seb128thanks13:33
ricotzseb128, hi :)13:34
seb128ricotz, hey13:35
ricotzseb128, i am looking into a vala patch http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/pkg/vala-0.18_0.18.1-0ubuntu4.debdiff which is needed with the next gobject-introspection release13:38
seb128pitti, ^ do you know about that? g-i is your domain ;-)13:39
ricotzseb128, weirdly i am running into build issues currently, will check this out first13:39
ricotzvapigen will fail/error-out on this new parameter otherwise13:40
ricotzseb128, ah, since the vala builds directly from the c source it isnt that easy to patch13:42
seb128ricotz, you probably want to include the diff to the .c as well13:43
ricotzseb128, yes, or depend on valac again13:43
seb128no, please no circular depends13:43
ricotzi know, it was annoying in the past13:43
pittiseb128: hey; reading (back from lunch)13:45
pittiricotz, seb128: ah, that's from Colin Walters, so seems fine; thanks for the heads-up, I wasn't aware that .girs are going to get the self argument13:46
ricotzseb128, pitti, http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/pkg/vala-0.18_0.18.1-0ubuntu4.debdiff14:01
pittieek14:02
pittiricotz: our vala package doesn't build-dep on vala to rebuild itself?14:02
ricotzpitti, no, not anymore14:02
pittibut *shrug*, it's ACN upstream, so will hopefully disappear soon14:03
ricotzpitti, yeah, hopefully14:04
ricotzalthough there isnt even a 0.19.x release yet14:04
ricotzi hope someone likes to sponsor it ;)14:07
seb128ricotz, it doesn't seem to be in the sponsoring queue?14:08
seb128not going to be sponsored if it's not in there...14:08
pittiricotz: ah, sure, I'll upload it14:08
ricotzseb128, ah, i meant upload it14:08
ricotzpitti, thanks!14:09
seb128ricotz, not likely to happen either (vala 0.19) if somebody doesn't put an update up for sponsoring14:09
seb128ricotz, currently desktop team has other priorities than packaging unstable series14:09
seb128ogra_, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2013-February/036448.html14:09
pittiseb128: c'est d'accord, j'ai le telecharge14:09
pitti..chargé14:10
seb128pitti, vala 0.19 ?14:10
pitti(^ je crois?)14:10
pittiseb128: no, ricotz's 0.18 patch14:10
ricotzseb128, yes, i was speaking of upstream, jbuergi seems busy14:10
seb128pitti, oh, ok14:10
seb128pitti, "télécharge" ;-)14:10
SuperMattis canonical still tracking one version behind gnome?14:10
pittiseb128: "j'ai le téléchargé"?14:10
seb128SuperMatt, canonical->ubuntu and define "one version behind" and "still"14:11
seb128SuperMatt, since this cycle we decided to stay on stable GNOME series rather than track unstable ones14:11
pittiSuperMatt: yeah, blocked by not having logind and also we decided to stay at 3.6 feature-wise for this cycle14:11
SuperMattgotcha14:11
ricotzseb128, just to clarify this patch is only present in vala master which hasnt seen a release this cycle yet14:11
SuperMattso essentially no gnome 3.8 in raring14:12
seb128pitti, "je l'ai téléchargé" if it's done, "je le télécharge" if you are doing it14:12
seb128pitti, french is hard? ;-)14:12
seb128SuperMatt, right, and no gnome 3.10 next cycle14:12
pittiseb128: ah, the "le" goes before the "have" even, merci14:12
seb128pitti, de rien!14:13
ricotzseb128, was there a conclusion about gtk+ 3.7.x?14:13
pittiseb128: I was applying German word order14:13
seb128ricotz, it might happen if somebody file the MIR for harfbuzz and figure the graphite2 depends and work then on the updates14:13
seb128ricotz, not likely to happen without somebody out of canonical-desktop-team helping though14:14
ricotzseb128, the packages are in gnome3-staging14:14
seb128so up to you and the other gnome3 ppa guys to see if you prefer to maintain it in a ppa or try to get it in the archvie14:14
seb128ricotz, that doesn't solve the MIR issue :p14:14
ricotzyeah, just the harfbuzz mir then14:15
seb128and the graphite2 thing14:15
ricotzthis dep can be dropped14:15
seb128and somebody to submit merge requests to review for those updates14:15
seb128I don't plan to go try to figure out what is happening in ppas14:15
Laneyogra_: config file? what for? Not that I'm aware of14:15
ricotzseb128, i see14:15
seb128pitti, yeah, I agree with you, german words order is weird, I always though so :p14:15
* seb128 hugs pitti14:16
* pitti tu donne une accolade aussi14:16
pitti"te"14:16
pittiargh!14:16
seb128shrug, it's another of those days were nothing is moving out of proposed thanks to powerpc14:16
seb128hate powerpc14:16
pittiFTBFS or slow?14:17
seb1286 hours backlog14:17
seb128well it's getting better, but the source I was looking to has been uploaded 6 hours ago and is set to build in 15 min14:17
Laneythe new buildd is pretty decent I've found14:21
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter
ogra_Laney, well, to define that it is at a usable size14:34
ogra_Laney, in landsacep it only occupies about 1/3 of the screen widht ... in portrait it is so small that i cant really use it14:35
ogra_*landscape14:35
=== zz_jackyalcine is now known as jackyalcine
xnoxseb128: mostly due to private jobs still building on powerpc....14:39
Laneyogra_: I'm sure things will improve wrt the tablet usecase over time14:41
Laneywe'll be able to have the nemo keyboard once Qt5 exists14:41
ogra_Laney, sure, i was just wondering if we could replace onboard ...14:41
Laneynot that I know if it's better or worse14:42
LaneyI wouldn't recommend that just now14:42
ogra_but the RAM usage seems to be the same and the actual kbd isnt really usable that way yet14:42
Laneylaney@bisquicks:~$ htop14:42
LaneyNo command 'htop' found, did you mean: Command 'hatop' from package 'hatop' (universe)14:42
Laneyerr14:42
ogra_its doesnt seem to buy us anything over onboard atm14:42
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
ogra_uh, what ?14:43
=== Ursinha is now known as Guest65450
LaneyI didn't suggest switching it just yet14:43
Laneywe should wait and see what happens, but now it's in the archive so people can play with it14:43
ogra_yeah14:46
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
=== Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha
=== jbicha_ is now known as jbicha
=== sil2100_ is now known as sil2100
GunnarHjseb128: still there?16:56
seb128GunnarHj, hey, sort of16:56
GunnarHjseb128: Hi Sebastien! Do you have time to sponsor the latest MP at bug 1103547? It's a regression fix, and we may be spared a few bug reports if it makes it into the archive fast.16:57
ubot2Launchpad bug 1103547 in language-selector (Ubuntu) "drag and drop does not work language support not complete" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/110354716:57
seb128GunnarHj, still there for 1.5 hours but with a backlog of work worth 3 hours :p16:57
GunnarHjseb128: sorry ...16:57
seb128GunnarHj, sure, that seems easy enough16:57
GunnarHjseb128: Great!16:57
seb128GunnarHj, no worry, usually end of week rush, nothing to stress about, some stuff will wait monday ;-)16:57
GunnarHjseb128: Sounds familiar, somehow... ;-)16:58
seb128:-)16:59
jbichawhy doesn't /org/freedesktop/hostname1 work right?17:05
seb128you mean?17:06
jbicha2 issues, 1 is that it looks like I have to run System Settings as root to be able to change the hostname in Details (so maybe that's GNOME)17:07
jbichaand apparently 'Computer' in the Nautilus 3.7.5 sidebar is supposed to be named as whatever the hostname is17:08
seb128jbicha, hostnamed is a systemd feature, do you run systemd?17:09
seb128ubuntu-system-service doesn't provide that interface I think17:09
seb128that's nothing new17:09
jbichano u-s-s does, it looks like the culprit is http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-control-center/tree/panels/common/gnome-control-center.rules17:10
seb128"org.freedesktop.hostname1.set-hostname"17:10
seb128that method is provided by systemd17:10
seb128no?17:11
seb128http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/hostnamed17:11
jbichahttp://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InterfacePortabilityAndStabilityChart17:11
seb128well the reason why changing hostname doesn't work on Ubuntu is because we don't have hostnamed17:11
seb128dunno about the ppa17:11
jbichathose methods are listed in d-feet too17:12
LaneyAA17:12
LaneyAFAICS those methods are provided by uss17:12
seb128org.freedesktop.hostname1.set-hostname org.freedesktop.hostname1.set-static-hostname are indeed17:13
seb128so maybe a but in u-s-s17:14
Laneyjbicha: that rules file would affect getting the hostname but not setting it?17:14
Laneyerr the other way around17:14
Laneyso the gcc problem but not the nautilus one17:14
jbichaok I filed bug 1119596 in case someone wants to look into that17:28
ubot2Launchpad bug 1119596 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Nautilus sidebar 'Computer' doesn't set itself to hostname correctly" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/111959617:28
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== jackyalcine is now known as zz_jackyalcine
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
GunnarHjseb128: Remember the l-s MP before you leave? ;-)18:22
seb128GunnarHj, merged/uploaded18:26
GunnarHjseb128: Thanks. Have a nice weekend!18:28
seb128GunnarHj, thanks, you as well ;-)18:28
seb128jbicha, Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-service/+bug/1119596/comments/118:33
ubot2Ubuntu bug 1119596 in ubuntu-system-service (Ubuntu) "Nautilus sidebar 'Computer' doesn't set itself to hostname correctly" [Undecided,New]18:33
seb128just fyi...18:33
jbichaseb128: thanks, that could be the problem with g-c-c too since it still didn't work after changing the group from "wheel" to "sudo"18:35
seb128jbicha, could be, I need to look at what g-c-c is trying to do18:36
seb128jbicha, we still plan to replace u-s-s by systemd helper (python -> C) this cycle so I think I will wait for that land to spend time on those issues18:36
seb128hopefully that should fix it18:37
seb128but I still need to check the comment about lack of files to start this prettyhostname and if systemd will work or if we need the file added18:37
jbichaah I was wondering whether that would land this cycle, it would be nice to get autosuspend back on my computer18:38
seb128jbicha, systemd helpers != logind18:43
seb128we will get the tools to set date, time, hostname, etc18:43
seb128not sure about logind, it's based on the systemd cgroup use18:44
seb128slangasek is looking into getting that to work on Ubuntu but we are not sure it's doable18:44
seb128if not we will need to implement compatible interfaces another way18:44
seb128but that would probably not be this cycle...18:44
jbichaok well, better date, time, and hostname would still be good18:46
* didrocks waves good evening18:54
ogra_hmm, have we lost the startup applications UI in raring ?18:55
ogra_or did it just move to a new hidden place18:55
Laneygnome-sesion-properties (from gnome-session-bin) - still exists here18:57
ogra_yeah, but only through the dash18:58
ogra_there is no way to find it through g-c-c or any menu anymore18:58
ogra_but well, i found it ...18:58
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
desrtxnox: any word on those fixes to the installer image?21:12
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
ozcanesenhey overlayscollbars disabling transparency of object, example:  http://i.imgur.com/URBRRXt.png , is anybody can help me to solve this? i can't understand why?23:24
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== zz_jackyalcine is now known as jackyalcine
=== jackyalcine is now known as Jacky_

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!