[00:48] <raevol> surprised i haven't seen more talk about this: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/01/ubuntu-considers-huge-change-that-would-end-traditional-release-cycle/
[00:48] <darthrobot> Title: [Ubuntu considers “huge” change that would end traditional release cycle | Ars Technica]
[00:49] <pleia2> because immediately after Leann said that, Jane clarified that's they're in the very very early stages of discussion ;)
[00:50] <pleia2> http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/379507/ubuntu-ceo-two-year-releases-are-only-an-idea
[00:50] <darthrobot> Title: [Ubuntu CEO: two-year releases are only "an idea" | News | PC Pro]
[00:50] <raevol> still an interesting proposal
[00:51] <pleia2> it would make it like debian
[00:51] <pleia2> testing is a rolling release, stable is released every 2 years or so
[00:52] <raevol> i think it's interesting because it means the ubuntu devs are, to some extent, confident in the stability of the development branch