[02:32] <infinity> apw, ogasawara: audit MIR is going through now, if someone wants to re-enable perf in linux-tools.
[15:59] <penguin42> re bug 1093217    comment #44 seems to be suggesting a commit that might be relavent; I've pushed them to do the bisect; but  I wondered if there is already enough info now to move to triaged
[15:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1093217 in linux (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 12.04 10-20min boot delay (From 3.2.0.29->3.2.0.30) [Lenovo IdeaPad Z580]" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1093217
[16:00] <penguin42> it's a pity there isn't an easy mech for end users to do bisects
[16:01] <ogra_> end users ?
[16:01] <ogra_> surely you wouldnt ask your MOM to do a bisect whatever easy mexh there would be, would you ?
[16:02] <ogra_> (and would *she* actually want to ...)
[16:02] <penguin42> ogra_: Well I'd agree but that seems to be the recommended path for what we tell users on kernel bugs
[16:03] <penguin42> ogra_: Personally I'd take that bug to triaged when it was between two releases; but Christopher has asked them for a bisection - see #28
[16:04] <penguin42> ogra_: But there again it shouldn't in principal be that hard to have a ppa like system that provided intermediate builds and walked through you a 'did that work? No? then try this one.'
[16:05] <ogra_> well, launchpad is open, feel free to implement it ;)
[16:05] <penguin42> hehe yes, well I was thinking of trying to set up a local lp vm
[16:05] <ogra_> i heard that isnt to hard (never did it myself though)
[16:09] <penguin42> might not even need to actually be in lp, a bot driving a ppa and the bug system; but then the starter would be a hack that would build a given git rev in the ppa 
[16:09] <ogra_> well, thats how prototypes are :)