darkxst | jbicha, is there really any point splitting up gcr libs? | 03:43 |
---|---|---|
jbicha | darkxst: ask upstream ;) | 04:38 |
jbicha | https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 | 04:39 |
ubot5 | Gnome bug 689685 in gcr "VAPI support for gcr" [Normal,New] | 04:39 |
jbicha | I was thinking Debian would want the libraries split although I'm not aware of any apps that use gcr but don't use gtk | 04:42 |
darkxst | I think the whole point of gcr is to provide the UI | 04:43 |
jbicha | splitting the libraries shouldn't hurt anything (except requiring rdepends to be rebuilt) but we should do the same thing Debian does | 04:47 |
jbicha | nothing needs the new gcr right? so maybe we should just hold off on updating gcr for now? | 04:48 |
jbicha | darkxst: Fedora hasn't bothered splitting gcr but Debian tends to split more than Fedora http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=382408 | 04:50 |
jbicha | I mean we do 10 packages and they do 3 :) | 04:51 |
darkxst | jbicha, I will ask stefw | 04:53 |
darkxst | jbicha, five-or-more http://pastebin.com/JXurftpM | 19:59 |
darkxst | four-in-a-row http://pastebin.com/4Hh99VMX | 20:06 |
jbicha | robert_ancell: why did you use dh for gnome-games instead of keeping cdbs? | 20:28 |
robert_ancell | jbicha, because dh is easier | 20:28 |
jbicha | robert_ancell: sure but I don't think the Debian GNOME team wants to switch | 20:29 |
robert_ancell | jbicha, sure, if they take the work upstream we'll just sync off them | 20:29 |
jbicha | or they could sync off us | 20:30 |
darkxst | chess http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW | 20:31 |
jbicha | darkxst: have you ever done transitional packages before? because chess needs one | 20:32 |
darkxst | jbicha, no | 20:32 |
robert_ancell | jbicha, well, I don't mind either way. So if you want to change it no opposition from me | 20:32 |
jbicha | darkxst: there's an example in line 251 of http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-gnome/desktop/experimental/gnome-games/debian/control.in?view=markup | 20:34 |
jbicha | darkxst: otherwise users won't get upgraded from glchess to the newer gnome-chess automatically | 20:34 |
darkxst | jbicha, ok | 20:39 |
darkxst | I suppose five-or-more also needs one | 20:39 |
darkxst | jbicha, so I remove the breaks/replaces from gnome-chess package? | 20:46 |
darkxst | like this? http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW | 20:48 |
darkxst | jbicha, ^ is that correct? | 21:10 |
darkxst | first 2 games updated also (same links) | 21:13 |
jbicha | we still need breaks/replaces since I think the new game ships some of the same files as the old one | 21:21 |
jbicha | in the Debian example, they used versioned b/r's though | 21:21 |
darkxst | jbicha, http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW | 22:22 |
ErtanERBEK | anyone know how can I hide windows content at drag or move time ? | 22:23 |
jbicha | darkxst: the Description line is missing some linebreaks | 22:31 |
darkxst | jbicha, ok, fixed all 3 debdiffs | 22:38 |
jbicha | darkxst: oops, that creates empty binaries | 23:11 |
darkxst | hmm how do I stop that? | 23:15 |
jbicha | when there is more than one binary, you have to use a .install to explicitly tell it which files go in which packages | 23:18 |
jbicha | http://paste.ubuntu.com/1634727/ | 23:22 |
jbicha | http://lintian.debian.org/tags/transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra.html | 23:23 |
darkxst | oh, I see | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!