[03:43] <darkxst> jbicha, is there really any point splitting up gcr libs?
[04:38] <jbicha> darkxst: ask upstream ;)
[04:39] <jbicha> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689685
[04:39] <ubot5> Gnome bug 689685 in gcr "VAPI support for gcr" [Normal,New]
[04:42] <jbicha> I was thinking Debian would want the libraries split although I'm not aware of any apps that use gcr but don't use gtk
[04:43] <darkxst> I think the whole point of gcr is to provide the UI
[04:47] <jbicha> splitting the libraries shouldn't hurt anything (except requiring rdepends to be rebuilt) but we should do the same thing Debian does
[04:48] <jbicha> nothing needs the new gcr right? so maybe we should just hold off on updating gcr for now?
[04:50] <jbicha> darkxst: Fedora hasn't bothered splitting gcr but Debian tends to split more than Fedora http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=382408
[04:51] <jbicha> I mean we do 10 packages and they do 3 :)
[04:53] <darkxst> jbicha, I will ask stefw
[19:59] <darkxst> jbicha, five-or-more http://pastebin.com/JXurftpM
[20:06] <darkxst> four-in-a-row http://pastebin.com/4Hh99VMX
[20:28] <jbicha> robert_ancell: why did you use dh for gnome-games instead of keeping cdbs?
[20:28] <robert_ancell> jbicha, because dh is easier
[20:29] <jbicha> robert_ancell: sure but I don't think the Debian GNOME team wants to switch
[20:29] <robert_ancell> jbicha, sure, if they take the work upstream we'll just sync off them
[20:30] <jbicha> or they could sync off us
[20:31] <darkxst> chess http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW
[20:32] <jbicha> darkxst: have you ever done transitional packages before? because chess needs one
[20:32] <darkxst> jbicha, no
[20:32] <robert_ancell> jbicha, well, I don't mind either way. So if you want to change it no opposition from me
[20:34] <jbicha> darkxst: there's an example in line 251 of http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-gnome/desktop/experimental/gnome-games/debian/control.in?view=markup
[20:34] <jbicha> darkxst: otherwise users won't get upgraded from glchess to the newer gnome-chess automatically
[20:39] <darkxst> jbicha, ok
[20:39] <darkxst> I suppose five-or-more also needs one
[20:46] <darkxst> jbicha, so I remove the breaks/replaces from gnome-chess package?
[20:48] <darkxst> like this? http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW
[21:10] <darkxst> jbicha, ^ is that correct?
[21:13] <darkxst> first 2 games updated also (same links)
[21:21] <jbicha> we still need breaks/replaces since I think the new game ships some of the same files as the old one
[21:21] <jbicha> in the Debian example, they used versioned b/r's though
[22:22] <darkxst> jbicha, http://pastebin.com/aqduXHEW
[22:23] <ErtanERBEK> anyone know how can I hide windows content at drag or move time ?
[22:31] <jbicha> darkxst: the Description line is missing some linebreaks
[22:38] <darkxst> jbicha, ok, fixed all 3 debdiffs
[23:11] <jbicha> darkxst: oops, that creates empty binaries
[23:15] <darkxst> hmm how do I stop that?
[23:18] <jbicha> when there is more than one binary, you have to use a .install to explicitly tell it which files go in which packages
[23:22] <jbicha> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1634727/
[23:23] <jbicha> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra.html
[23:43] <darkxst> oh, I  see