| cjwelborn | i'm not a big IRC user, how can I filter out all these system msgs like "blah joined", "blah left", etc. ? | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwelborn | doh, wrong channel, sorry. | 00:03 |
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest52920 | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest11938 | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest64189 | ||
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| Catbuntu | Hi | 18:33 |
| sandyd | o/ coffeecat | 18:54 |
| sandyd | and elfy | 18:54 |
| Iowan | meeting time... | 19:02 |
| elfy | we'll have a little wait and see if s.fox turns up | 19:02 |
| elfy | beat me to the post there Iowan | 19:02 |
| Catbuntu | What's the meeting about? | 19:08 |
| Iowan | Forum Council monthly meeting | 19:08 |
| * jacob dances | 19:09 | |
| jacob | (as is customary while waiting for meetings in #ubuntu-meeting) | 19:09 |
| elfy | lol | 19:09 |
| elfy | #startmeeting Forum Council monthly meeting | 19:12 |
| meetingology | Meeting started Sun Feb 10 19:12:12 2013 UTC. The chair is elfy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. | 19:12 |
| meetingology | Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired | 19:12 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Forum Council monthly meeting Meeting | Current topic: | ||
| elfy | agenda at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ForumCouncilAgenda | 19:12 |
| elfy | #voters Iowan cariboo907 coffeecat elfy | 19:12 |
| meetingology | Current voters: Iowan cariboo907 coffeecat elfy | 19:12 |
| elfy | #topic minimal staff requirements | 19:13 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Forum Council monthly meeting Meeting | Current topic: minimal staff requirements | ||
| elfy | ok - think that's that done - so minimal staff requirements as per the discussion we've already had | 19:13 |
| elfy | oh hang on :) | 19:14 |
| elfy | #topic FC meeting | 19:14 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | Forum Council monthly meeting Meeting | Current topic: FC meeting | ||
| elfy | #subtopic minimal staff requirements | 19:14 |
| elfy | as far as I'm aware that's been discussed by staff - anyone want to add anything | 19:15 |
| coffeecat | not really. | 19:15 |
| cariboo907 | I thinks it's been discussed enough | 19:16 |
| Iowan | I just ran through a quick review | 19:16 |
| coffeecat | I think we just need to vote it to make it "official" | 19:16 |
| * elfy too | 19:17 | |
| elfy | Iowan: you ok with that? | 19:17 |
| Iowan | ++++ | 19:17 |
| Iowan | Just waiting for ely to find the "vote" button. | 19:18 |
| Iowan | *Elfy | 19:18 |
| elfy | #vote Accept the minimal staff requirements as discussed in forum | 19:18 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Accept the minimal staff requirements as discussed in forum | 19:18 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 19:18 |
| elfy | +1 | 19:18 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 19:18 |
| Iowan | +1 | 19:18 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 19:18 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 19:18 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 19:18 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 19:18 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 19:18 |
| elfy | #endvote | 19:18 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Accept the minimal staff requirements as discussed in forum | 19:18 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 19:18 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 19:18 |
| elfy | #subtopic Place for users to discuss Agenda Items | 19:19 |
| Iowan | ... gotta go look... | 19:19 |
| elfy | OK - so I'm off the opinion that we should provide a place on forum so users can have somewhere to discuss agenda items | 19:19 |
| coffeecat | Perhaps a single sticky thread for each agenda item in FF&H, but it'll make the sticky area cluttered. | 19:20 |
| cariboo907 | +1, as usually all the links are to discussions in SCC | 19:20 |
| elfy | Not sure of the detail - perhaps a stuck thread we can use to index threads in FFH then seperate threads | 19:20 |
| elfy | how about that ^^ coffeecat ? | 19:20 |
| coffeecat | elfy - that's better - 1 sticky linked to discussions threads. | 19:20 |
| elfy | we can then link staff threads and user threads in agenda as well | 19:21 |
| coffeecat | yes - that works for me | 19:21 |
| cariboo907 | That's what I 'd like to see | 19:21 |
| elfy | seems logical | 19:21 |
| Iowan | I'm unsure of details- hafta see it, I guess. | 19:22 |
| Iowan | There is link to agenda - should dthat expand? | 19:22 |
| elfy | not sure what you mean Iowan | 19:23 |
| Iowan | Me either... I just noticed link in Ubuntu Community Discussions | 19:23 |
| Iowan | That links to aenda wiki page | 19:23 |
| Iowan | ... but you're talking FF&H link/sticky | 19:24 |
| elfy | oic - no - we'd have a index stuck in FFH - then we can just use normal threads for users to actually discuss agenda items | 19:24 |
| cariboo907 | all the links in the agenda lead to SCC, we'd like the forum membership to be able to discuss agenda items | 19:24 |
| elfy | as it is most of the links in agenda are only any good for staff | 19:24 |
| elfy | cariboo907: thanks +1 | 19:25 |
| Iowan | FTR, an agenda discussion area is a good idea | 19:25 |
| elfy | ok | 19:25 |
| elfy | vote then? | 19:25 |
| coffeecat | yes | 19:25 |
| cariboo907 | yes | 19:25 |
| Iowan | Yep - details tbd | 19:26 |
| coffeecat | no - we have some details I think ^^^ | 19:26 |
| elfy | #vote Create stuck index in FFH then create threads as required for forum users to discuss items | 19:26 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Create stuck index in FFH then create threads as required for forum users to discuss items | 19:26 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 19:26 |
| Iowan | +1 | 19:26 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 19:26 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 19:26 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 19:26 |
| elfy | +1 | 19:26 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 19:26 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 19:26 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 19:26 |
| elfy | #endvote | 19:26 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Create stuck index in FFH then create threads as required for forum users to discuss items | 19:26 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 19:26 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 19:26 |
| elfy | #subtopic Username Changes | 19:27 |
| elfy | ok - I propose we formally stop the embargo on username changes | 19:27 |
| elfy | allow one change of they want it | 19:27 |
| elfy | see how it goes - if it's too much - then go back to not doing it | 19:28 |
| Iowan | * with reason | 19:28 |
| elfy | I'd not want to see us changing people more than once - enough reason for me :) | 19:28 |
| coffeecat | Interesting request in RC which Iowan fielded. I agree with what Iowan said. We need to say to these people if we change your username to your real name, you are stuck with it. | 19:28 |
| cariboo907 | I don't have a problem with that, just so we don't have some members changing their user name, as often as they change their socks | 19:28 |
| Iowan | (maybe more) | 19:29 |
| elfy | cariboo907: we say at outset we'll not do it | 19:29 |
| cariboo907 | I know, this was just FTR :) | 19:29 |
| coffeecat | we could rewrite the sticky. | 19:29 |
| elfy | maybe change CoC | 19:29 |
| elfy | coffeecat: at least that | 19:30 |
| Iowan | I don't necessarily wanna forbid >1 change, but don't wanna advertise it. | 19:30 |
| elfy | I'd rather say 1 now - rather than the piecemeal thing we have at present | 19:30 |
| coffeecat | I agree - 1 change - that's it otherwise some would abuse it. | 19:31 |
| coffeecat | So we could spell out - if you want a trivial change, that's it. | 19:31 |
| elfy | I can agree to that | 19:32 |
| Iowan | As currently, I'd opt for "special cases", but officially ... | 19:32 |
| elfy | this is the problem | 19:32 |
| Iowan | Even first change is subject to a "vanity clause" | 19:32 |
| elfy | as it stands we've got threads where one says yes then 2 days later someone else says no | 19:33 |
| cariboo907 | Isn't that what most name changes are for, vanity? | 19:33 |
| elfy | one change should be enough imo | 19:33 |
| elfy | cariboo907: +1 | 19:33 |
| elfy | I can't see any reason for more than one | 19:34 |
| elfy | that's enough to warrant expecting someone else to take time out of their day to do it | 19:34 |
| Iowan | I'm +1 on softening restriction - it's the degree that is in question | 19:36 |
| Iowan | I don't necessarily wanna post a "First namechange free!" announcement, either | 19:37 |
| elfy | well no - neither would I | 19:37 |
| coffeecat | I don't think we have to - simply revamp the sticky | 19:37 |
| Iowan | That part sounds good | 19:37 |
| Iowan | (sneak up on it) | 19:38 |
| coffeecat | And if people ask for trivial change or change to real name, ask: are you absolutely sure? Because when it's done, it's done. | 19:38 |
| elfy | if it becomes too much of a problem - we just go back anyway, I don't think the sticky was the result of anything but a discussion elsewhere | 19:38 |
| cariboo907 | especially seeing as most members ignore the stickies :) | 19:38 |
| elfy | lol | 19:38 |
| coffeecat | lol | 19:38 |
| Iowan | stickies? We have stickies? | 19:38 |
| * coffeecat votes for post-dated stickies! | 19:38 | |
| elfy | :) | 19:38 |
| elfy | so - do we have enough to work with, relax current state of name changes - ensure user knows they've got one bite, change back if it becomes necessary? | 19:40 |
| coffeecat | I think we have enough - draft a sticky and agree text in ml perhaps. | 19:40 |
| Iowan | +1 let's get rules softened - ali'l | 19:40 |
| cariboo907 | I'd say yes to that | 19:40 |
| elfy | k | 19:40 |
| * Iowan awaits vote | 19:41 | |
| elfy | #vote Relax username change rule, follow up in the future if necessary | 19:41 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Relax username change rule, follow up in the future if necessary | 19:41 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 19:41 |
| elfy | +1 | 19:41 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 19:41 |
| Iowan | +1 | 19:41 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 19:41 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 19:41 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 19:41 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 19:41 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 19:41 |
| elfy | #endvote | 19:41 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Relax username change rule, follow up in the future if necessary | 19:41 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 19:41 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 19:41 |
| elfy | #subtopic Discussion on #ubuntuforums IRC channel moderation | 19:42 |
| elfy | not sure Lord of Time is here to discuss this | 19:42 |
| cariboo907 | I have no opinion on this, as I don't spend enough time on IRC | 19:42 |
| elfy | my opinion is there's not really any need to do anything - the few times it's a problem doesn't warrant any official response in my opinion | 19:43 |
| coffeecat | I get the feeling that there is not much appetite for this beyond encouraging mods to hang out in #ubuntuforums and help if necessary | 19:43 |
| coffeecat | It shouldn't be part of the "official" task | 19:43 |
| coffeecat | imo | 19:43 |
| elfy | agreed | 19:44 |
| Iowan | If necessary, someone (CC?) may need to "hire" IRC moderators - as it isn't REALLY the forum | 19:44 |
| elfy | I'm happy enough to shelve this - if lot want's to follow up he can | 19:44 |
| Iowan | +1 | 19:45 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 19:45 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 19:45 |
| elfy | Iowan: up to a point I agree, the only real issue is we allow a certain amount of 'freeplay' there | 19:45 |
| Iowan | table it! | 19:45 |
| elfy | vote on doing nothing for the time being then :) | 19:45 |
| coffeecat | lol | 19:45 |
| jacob | fwiw, anyone with the ubuntu/member/* mask can op in #ubuntuforums | 19:46 |
| elfy | jacob: thanks | 19:46 |
| elfy | I think lol | 19:46 |
| * elfy foresees madness | 19:46 | |
| elfy | #vote Leave #ubuntuforums channel moderation for LoT to revisit if needed | 19:47 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Leave #ubuntuforums channel moderation for LoT to revisit if needed | 19:47 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 19:47 |
| elfy | +1 | 19:47 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 19:47 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 19:47 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 19:47 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 19:47 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 19:47 |
| Iowan | +1 | 19:47 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 19:47 |
| elfy | #endvote | 19:47 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Leave #ubuntuforums channel moderation for LoT to revisit if needed | 19:47 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 19:47 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 19:47 |
| jacob | (actually, i might be wrong about the ubuntu/member thing, that used to be there, but isn't now) | 19:48 |
| elfy | #subtopic Referral links on ubuntuforums | 19:48 |
| Iowan | sure, NOW you mention it :) | 19:48 |
| elfy | jacob: ok | 19:48 |
| jacob | :D :D :D | 19:48 |
| elfy | coffeecat can lead on this one :) | 19:49 |
| coffeecat | OK - just getting my head round it. | 19:49 |
| coffeecat | three bits: referral links in sigs, referral links from new members who have signed up to spam forum with link, and post links form extablished members. Is this a good way of dividing up the subject? | 19:50 |
| coffeecat | #2 seems obvious. | 19:50 |
| elfy | yea - logical to me | 19:51 |
| elfy | and #2 is obvious | 19:51 |
| cariboo907 | works for me | 19:51 |
| coffeecat | I'll say straight up I'm not comfortable with referral links in sigs even with estabished members. | 19:51 |
| Iowan | sig links at least require 25 previous posts... | 19:52 |
| Iowan | although that's more of a permanent as | 19:52 |
| coffeecat | trouble with sig links is that they appear in every post - obvious I know - but it's spammy, imo | 19:52 |
| Iowan | *ad | 19:52 |
| cariboo907 | we've had them as long as I've been a member of the forum | 19:52 |
| Iowan | (We've had spammers, too ;) | 19:53 |
| cariboo907 | Ubuntu One now has referrals too | 19:53 |
| Iowan | That's unfortunate, as it's officially sanctioned. | 19:54 |
| Iowan | Kinda sets a precedent | 19:54 |
| cariboo907 | that's why I feel we should allow referral links in sigs, but ban someone that only joins to provide a link | 19:55 |
| elfy | perhaps make it a perk if you've got as far as being registered users plus ... | 19:55 |
| coffeecat | possibly not a precedent - Ubuntu1 on referrals says family and friends. I'll see if I can find link. | 19:55 |
| cariboo907 | that would work for me | 19:55 |
| elfy | however | 19:55 |
| elfy | I would not want to have hundreds of reports just to deal with sig links | 19:55 |
| cariboo907 | coffeecat, https://one.ubuntu.com/help/faq/referral-program-terms/ | 19:56 |
| coffeecat | https://one.ubuntu.com/help/faq/referral-program-terms/ - quite clearly family and friends so I don't think a precedent for forum. | 19:56 |
| elfy | especially given "must not send any referral request in violation of applicable law (e.g. spam)" | 19:57 |
| coffeecat | ok - it goes onto say publicly | 19:57 |
| Iowan | CoC comes to mind... | 19:57 |
| cariboo907 | with the stipulation that you must disclose that you are getting extra storage, that may take more than 3 lines in a sig :) | 19:59 |
| Iowan | Home pages can also be problems... but they, too, have been around longer than I have. (back on topic) | 20:00 |
| elfy | horny subject this is turning into | 20:00 |
| cariboo907 | we may need to discuss this more, before voting on it | 20:01 |
| elfy | yea | 20:01 |
| cariboo907 | I'd suggest we table it until our next meeting | 20:01 |
| elfy | at least we can discuss parts further perhaps | 20:01 |
| Iowan | +1 We'r into overtime | 20:01 |
| coffeecat | +1 for more debate in SCC. | 20:01 |
| elfy | ok | 20:02 |
| elfy | #vote Referral links - table for further discussion | 20:02 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Referral links - table for further discussion | 20:02 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 20:02 |
| cariboo907 | =1 | 20:02 |
| Iowan | +1 | 20:02 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 20:02 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 20:02 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 20:02 |
| elfy | +1 | 20:02 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 20:02 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 20:02 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 20:02 |
| elfy | #endvote | 20:02 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Referral links - table for further discussion | 20:02 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:02 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 20:02 |
| elfy | #subtopic Forum Upgrade | 20:02 |
| elfy | this subject could take as long as the other 4 or 5 ... | 20:03 |
| coffeecat | perhaps not... | 20:03 |
| elfy | :)_ | 20:03 |
| elfy | first up is the proposed date | 20:03 |
| elfy | at present we are hoping to do this at the end of February | 20:04 |
| elfy | coffeecat: can you do the points - I've forgotten where we were with trying to drive the bot :| | 20:05 |
| cariboo907 | Is there anything that will stop this from happening? | 20:05 |
| elfy | cariboo907: nothing major | 20:05 |
| coffeecat | deej - one of the sysadmins - is seeing if IS can do 28th Feb (Thurs). | 20:05 |
| cariboo907 | aside from the user name location? | 20:05 |
| coffeecat | 08:00 UTC start. Needs up to 8 hours.... | 20:05 |
| coffeecat | So hopefully done by 16:00 UTC on the Thurs. | 20:06 |
| coffeecat | THen we start picking up the pieces. :/ | 20:06 |
| coffeecat | cariboo907, there are some usability issues still outstanding on staging, but no real show-stoppers... | 20:07 |
| elfy | cariboo907 Iowan - the thinking being that if we try and do it UK time we havew 3/5ths of us about while it's going on | 20:07 |
| coffeecat | If we wait till we've fixed them all, it'll be the turn of the next millenium... | 20:07 |
| cariboo907 | that worksd for me, as I'm at work during those hours, and off Friday, Saturday and most of Sunday | 20:07 |
| coffeecat | cariboo907, that's great.. | 20:07 |
| elfy | excellent - so we'd have 4/5ths kind of about for the few days following | 20:07 |
| coffeecat | apart from fidlling in admincp, we'll need people with experience of staging to help users in FF&H... | 20:08 |
| Iowan | UK time makes sense | 20:08 |
| elfy | coffeecat: +1 | 20:08 |
| Iowan | I'm gonna be climbing another learning curve, too. | 20:09 |
| elfy | I would say that the most important decision we need to make is | 20:09 |
| coffeecat | elfy - suggest we make another pleas to any modertaors here atm to get into staging and find their way around. | 20:09 |
| elfy | do we hold back on the upgrade for 'little' issues - or deal with those after upgrade | 20:10 |
| cariboo907 | if they are 'little issues' I say lets do it | 20:10 |
| Iowan | We've been waiting for these upgrades since...??? | 20:10 |
| elfy | cariboo907 Iowan - we have things like tags not showing in forum view without mouseover | 20:10 |
| coffeecat | mark thread as solved not working.... | 20:10 |
| elfy | I say - go forward - deal with those things afterwards | 20:10 |
| elfy | coffeecat: +1 | 20:10 |
| coffeecat | user profile in wrong place in posts.... | 20:10 |
| coffeecat | But none of these are showstoppers imo | 20:11 |
| elfy | that seems to be the thing we are dealing with - are things mods to templates or addons | 20:11 |
| jacob | does the main page still default to the activity view? (instead of the forum list) | 20:11 |
| elfy | jacob: no | 20:11 |
| jacob | elfy: good good, that was my only gripe :) | 20:11 |
| elfy | jacob: if the last time you looked then it will look much different now :) | 20:12 |
| jacob | editing my hosts file as we speak | 20:12 |
| coffeecat | jacob - it looks like a usable forum now! ;-) | 20:12 |
| jacob | or type | 20:12 |
| Iowan | I presume these little issues will still be attacked - even if date is set... | 20:13 |
| elfy | Iowan: yea - priorities | 20:13 |
| coffeecat | Iowan - the way I see it is the little outstanding issues a re little different in kind from the sort of things we need to attend to week by week. The forum is always in flux. | 20:13 |
| elfy | as and aside any ubuntu member who gained membership by way of forum activity is welcome to check out the staging forum - send a PM via forum to one of the admins | 20:14 |
| jacob | ooh, that looks nice. some bits and bobs weird with the theme, but it's looking great otherwise | 20:14 |
| cariboo907 | I've had a couple of pm's from ubuntu members | 20:14 |
| Iowan | coffeecat: My point, exactly. | 20:14 |
| elfy | jacob: the dots will change - hiccup I think :) | 20:15 |
| elfy | cariboo907: yea - think I got about 6 | 20:15 |
| * coffeecat admits mea culpa on the dors. I pointed Merk at the wrong graphic. Sackcloth and ashes here. | 20:15 | |
| elfy | :D | 20:15 |
| coffeecat | *dots* | 20:15 |
| elfy | I wasn't pointing fingers coffeecat :) | 20:15 |
| coffeecat | lol | 20:15 |
| elfy | time moving on now - we were late and now at an hour :) | 20:16 |
| coffeecat | elfy - I think wheels have been set in motion for 28th.... | 20:16 |
| elfy | coffeecat: I know deej was going to post to ticket re date after talking to IS | 20:17 |
| cariboo907 | do we need to vote on an official date to do the upgrade? | 20:17 |
| Iowan | Does this item require anything official? | 20:17 |
| elfy | coffeecat: do we wait for end of 11th - then post | 20:17 |
| Iowan | (out-typed) | 20:17 |
| coffeecat | I suggest we only need to vote if there is any objection to 28th... | 20:17 |
| elfy | cariboo907 Iowan - I think we need to vote on a couple of things | 20:17 |
| coffeecat | Of course we don't know yet whether IS can do the 28th | 20:17 |
| elfy | date and moving anyway if the only things stopping upgrade are 'niggles' | 20:18 |
| Iowan | k ?? | 20:18 |
| elfy | jono: you might want to look into the forum upgrade issues as well - being community manager ;) | 20:18 |
| cariboo907 | +1 on the date, and if there are only niggles, +1 too | 20:18 |
| elfy | 2 votes or one? | 20:19 |
| Iowan | 2 | 20:19 |
| elfy | ok | 20:19 |
| Iowan | same answer, though | 20:19 |
| elfy | #vote Approach IS to upgrade live forum on 28 Feb - starting aty 08:00UTC | 20:20 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Approach IS to upgrade live forum on 28 Feb - starting aty 08:00UTC | 20:20 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 20:20 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 20:20 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 20:20 |
| Iowan | +1 | 20:20 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 20:20 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 20:20 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 20:20 |
| elfy | +1 | 20:20 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 20:20 |
| elfy | #endvote | 20:20 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Approach IS to upgrade live forum on 28 Feb - starting aty 08:00UTC | 20:20 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:20 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 20:20 |
| Iowan | Does that actually answer the wne vote? | 20:20 |
| Iowan | *2nd | 20:21 |
| elfy | #vote Upgrade forum to vB4 regardless of small theme/addon issues - further discussion in staff area if needed | 20:22 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Upgrade forum to vB4 regardless of small theme/addon issues - further discussion in staff area if needed | 20:22 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) | 20:22 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 20:22 |
| meetingology | +1 received from cariboo907 | 20:22 |
| Iowan | +1 | 20:22 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 20:22 |
| meetingology | +1 received from Iowan | 20:22 |
| meetingology | +1 received from coffeecat | 20:22 |
| elfy | +1 | 20:22 |
| meetingology | +1 received from elfy | 20:22 |
| elfy | #endvote | 20:22 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Upgrade forum to vB4 regardless of small theme/addon issues - further discussion in staff area if needed | 20:22 |
| meetingology | Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 | 20:22 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 20:22 |
| elfy | ok - I think the only things left are the division of labour/team report | 20:23 |
| elfy | we can do those in admin channel or SCC imho | 20:23 |
| coffeecat | +1 | 20:23 |
| Iowan | lets... | 20:23 |
| cariboo907 | +1 | 20:23 |
| elfy | Iowan: lets +1 ? or lets something else :) | 20:24 |
| Iowan | didn't know it was a vote... OK +1 | 20:24 |
| elfy | it's not :p | 20:24 |
| elfy | #endmeeting | 20:24 |
| === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendar | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | ||
| meetingology | Meeting ended Sun Feb 10 20:24:45 2013 UTC. | 20:24 |
| meetingology | Minutes (wiki): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2013/ubuntu-meeting.2013-02-10-19.12.moin.txt | 20:24 |
| meetingology | Minutes (html): http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2013/ubuntu-meeting.2013-02-10-19.12.html | 20:24 |
| Iowan | OK - lets do those in admin channel or SCC imho | 20:24 |
| elfy | yep - that was my hope :) | 20:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!