[04:41] <xnox> ESphynx: meh. fair enough =) it's not like it will support arm64 anytime before amd64 and etc.
[04:45] <xnox> ESphynx: well it's in NEW queue for experimental due to package rename. But yeah, it's almost at the point where it is suitable for sid.
[04:45] <xnox> Doesn't mater much though becuase, sid is frozen....
[04:45] <micahgmobile> Sid isn't frozen, wheezy is
[04:49] <xnox> micahg_mobile: meh
[04:51] <micahg_mobile> In fact, there's nothing wrong with uploading a new source package to Sid since it won't migrate anyways
[04:51] <micahg_mobile> Err...brand new source
[07:46] <dholbach> good morning
[09:25] <Laney> if anyone has some spare minutes, I'd appreciate some help on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html
[09:25] <Laney> in particular there's a haskell-distributive sub transition in there
[11:40] <Laney> LoganCloud: dholbach: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxsession-edit/0.2.0-3ubuntu1
[11:40] <Laney> lxsession has a lxsession-edit package
[11:40] <Laney> an
[11:41] <dholbach> Laney, maybe gilir can help make a decision here?
[11:42] <Laney> maybe
[11:42] <Laney> but tab completion says he isn't on irc ;-)
[11:57] <mitya57> dholbach: I think I have second part of bug 1121795 fix :)
[11:58] <mitya57> just disabling the \usepackage{times} makes the code blocks working
[11:58] <dholbach> mitya57, that's great!
[11:59] <mitya57> this should be potentially applied to all cyrillic (or even all non-latin) languages, but I'll only add it for ru now
[12:16] <mitya57> dholbach: I didn't manage to figure out how to use ifeq inside a make target (seems not possible), so I'm going to apply this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1636159/
[12:17]  * mitya57 wonders if this should go upstream
[12:23] <Rhonda> Alright, if ppa is sorta archive, even when I delete packages from there - is it still possible to get to the old sources?
[12:23] <Rhonda> … to potentially reupload them, reverting the delete?
[12:26] <dholbach> mitya57, thanks so much for looking into this
[12:26] <maxb> Rhonda: I think they are retained for a while - expand the detailed information for the package version, and see if the file names are links or not
[12:38] <Rhonda> maxb: The package version isn't there anymore right after the delete
[12:39] <maxb> view superseded packages
[12:42] <Rhonda> superseded packages?
[12:43] <Rhonda> ah!
[12:43]  * Rhonda hugs maxb
[12:45] <mitya57> dholbach: finally managed to make a working if block, pushed
[12:45] <mitya57> dholbach: thanks, it's my language after all :)
[12:46] <mitya57> and looks like cmap package is not needed with cm-super fonts
[12:49] <mitya57> dholbach: also, re http://people.ubuntu.com/~mitya57/ubuntu-packaging-guide-readme.html#translating: did I miss something there?
[12:56] <dholbach> mitya57, no, looks good to me :)
[12:57] <mitya57> dholbach: nice
[12:57]  * mitya57 will be back in 30 minutes
[14:30] <ESphynx> xnox / micahg:  So what's the status on that conflict bug and SRU guys? :)
[14:40] <xnox> ESphynx: conflict waiting for debian new queue review or  ubuntu FeatureFreeze which ever comes first. Didn't have time to look at the SRU yet.
[14:42] <ESphynx> ah ok
[14:42] <ESphynx> xnox: I made a .debdiff that's ok?
[14:42] <ESphynx> I also linked to the bzr branch
[14:42] <ESphynx> speaking of the FF, that's near beginning of March, right?
[14:43] <ESphynx> I'm hoping to have a new version ready before then, with real 64 bit support...
[14:43] <xnox> ESphynx: yeah, something like that.
[14:43] <xnox> ESphynx: He =) well 64bit I expect on all 64 bit platforms include ppc64 & arm64 ;-)))))))
[14:45] <ESphynx> xnox: well I might not be able to test it in time on those
[14:45] <ESphynx> xnox: but theoretically it should mostly work
[14:45] <ESphynx> xnox: afaik it already works on ppc/arm
[14:46] <ESphynx> I'd be interested to get eC on that 'Quickly' thing :P
[15:09] <Rhonda> grmpf
[15:10] <Rhonda> If I upload the same source I don't even get a reject mail. :)
[16:56] <hrw> ia64 is also 64bit...
[16:57] <ESphynx> Who tests all these platforms anyways? :P
[22:00] <alo21> HI. Can someone help on understanding this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1117613)...
[22:01] <alo21> it says that is not a sync, but a merge. But LJ synced it
[22:01] <alo21> why? Should I do something or is OK?=