[02:37] cjwatson: or anyone from Ubuntu Developers, any idea how I go about getting the 4.2 into raring? the link on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/4.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu2 does not exist. [08:27] infinity: we have a tentative fix for the hanging (using the same groupid for all things that are launched by dbus-test-runner) so that nothing stall once killed. Just published to the distro (in 3 minutes) [08:27] infinity: keep us posted if you see more hanging === henrix_ is now known as henrix === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|lunch === mmrazik|lunch is now known as mmrazik [11:49] Hey guys quick question about the final release will we be promoting the 64bit version over the 32bit version this time? Being as it contains the secure boot stuff. [11:50] davmor2: we are releasing both images and both are in the same location. [11:50] davmor2: w.r.t. which one should be the default download button on the www.ubuntu.com website, this can be discussed on ubuntu-devel mailing list. [11:51] (there was a big thread around 12.04 release and there was one recent one) [11:51] davmor2: uefi/secureboot is not the default across many machines, and practically all of them either use bios by default or can toggle to use bios. [11:52] xnox: okay I was just wondering I can see people grabbing the recommended version and then not being able to install it due to secureboot was all :) [11:52] we are pushing warnings to the website indicating that UEFI/SecureBoot machines should choose 64-bit edition [11:53] xnox: ah right that is pretty cool then [11:53] they're already there [11:54] as of yesterday === yofel_ is now known as yofel === doko_ is now known as doko [14:37] didrocks: Danke. [15:09] I don't suppose anyone has the power to unblock me from #ubuntu-devel [15:11] !ircops ^ [15:11] Factoid 'ircops ^' not found [15:11] !ircops [15:11] Factoid 'ircops' not found [15:12] * xnox can't remember the right command [15:12] ev: ping folks on #ubuntu-irc channel [15:12] they have magic powers [15:13] I should have [15:13] but they're unclean [15:13] Let me just try to remember how [15:13] cheers [15:13] is this going to be a bedknobs and broomsticks moment? [15:14] ? [15:15] oh, I had assumed this was a staple of the standard british upbringing [15:15] trying to remember the correct spell [15:15] I guess it was a poor joke at best :) [15:16] ev: try now? [15:17] ev: I'm not actually sure you weren't already unbanned [15:24] ev: I'm not sure it was a good metaphor without a scene notation, you americans so much to learn still :) [15:24] :) === zequence_ is now known as zequence [15:25] ev: I'd forgiven you if you had gone for, cjwatson so unblocking me will be like Mary Poppins Carpet Bag, all magic and unexplainable ;) [15:34] davmor2: why like yoda, you speak? (RE: you americans so much to learn still) [15:35] xnox: Yoda is the master the Americans are the pupils, much to learn they have still hmmmmmmm :) === chuck_ is now known as zul === henrix is now known as henrix_ === henrix_ is now known as henrix === henrix is now known as henrix_ === Noskcaj is now known as Noskcaj_AFK [21:33] hi good people, is there a ubiquity person about to have a quick look at an 'odd' bug, there is crash report but getting it to reproduce reliably is a problem [21:39] phillw: I can maybe have a look [21:39] phillw: what's the bug #? [21:41] slangasek: we're trying to get it able to be reproducable, but there is a crash report. http://paste.ubuntu.com/1659776/ Nicholas is trying it on real machine, as it is only seen intermitantly on VM's. [21:43] phillw: where is the crash report? [21:43] slangasek: on that link? [21:43] rather: why is this crash report in a pastebin, rather than submitted to errors.ubuntu.com / launchpad? [21:44] slangasek: we're still trying to get a reproducable crash, as a bug that happens something like 1 in 10, is going to be really hard on the devs. [21:44] phillw: having this in a pastebin instead of in launchpad is worse [21:45] step 1) submit the crash report, step 2) figure out how to reproduce it :) [21:45] okies. [21:48] slangasek: bug 1126671 [21:55] slangasek: turns out it is dupe of https://launchpad.net/bugs/1123798 [21:55] Ubuntu bug 1123798 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity-dm crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit timed out" [High,Confirmed] [21:55] not sure why I didn't get that one as it lubuntu named. [21:55] phillw: yep - one of the advantages of getting the crash report filed is that the dupe checker gets a crack at it ;) [21:56] slangasek: thanks boss :) [21:56] phillw: so AIUI the problem is that lubuntu doesn't ship consolekit, and something is causing ubiquity-dm to now require it [21:56] the simplest solution, on the lubuntu side, would seem to be including consolekit [21:56] (I'm surprised it's not already there, TBH) [22:00] slangasek: read the bug.... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1123798/comments/5 [22:00] Ubuntu bug 1123798 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity-dm crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit timed out" [High,Confirmed] [22:01] Noskaj will be along later, He's on AUS time. [22:02] phillw: well, I discounted that comment because it's a low-content followup and nobody reported this bug against Ubuntu; I can kick off a test here though [22:03] slangasek: balloons is trying on real kit, but is waiting for the iso to copy over. [22:03] * slangasek nods [22:04] slangasek: if you would /j #ubuntu-quality that is where the discussion is. I do think that is the better channel to discuss on?