[19:12] <stgraber> xnox: s/derivative/flavour/g ;)
[19:13] <xnox> stgraber:  ECONTEXT - is that correction against the backgrounds bug comment?
[19:14] <stgraber> xnox: against your changelog entry in ubiquity ;)
[19:14] <xnox> fair enough.
[19:16]  * xnox still doesn't have a clear & consistent terminology for components, pockets, archives, suites. colin corrected me a few times, but i can't help it still
[19:19] <stgraber> a lot of peole get confused between derivatives and flavours but we've tried to get it consistent over the past year or so.
[19:19] <stgraber> flavours are products that are built from the Ubuntu archive, most of which have been explicitly approved by the TB.
[19:20] <stgraber> derivatives are products done outside of the Ubuntu community but based on Ubuntu.
[19:20] <stgraber> so Edubuntu is a flavour and Mint is a derivative.
[19:20] <stgraber> When working in Ubuntu, we should usually care about flavours as they're part of the project, but we don't really have to care about derivatives
[19:22] <xnox> stgraber: official vs unofficial flavour?
[19:22] <xnox> or simply it's a flavour if meta-package is in the ubuntu-archive and is self-contained in the ubuntu archive?
[19:23] <stgraber> self-contained in the ubuntu archive is what makes a flavour
[19:23] <stgraber> official vs non-official then depends on whether the Technical Board accepted it as such