=== imbrando1 is now known as imbrandon
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
[06:47] <dholbach> good morning
[06:47] <ESphynx> 'morning dholbach
[06:47] <ESphynx> you're up early tonight :P
[06:48] <dholbach> hi ESphynx
[07:25] <geser> good morning
[07:50] <shadeslayer> anyone around to upload a new telepathy-logger?
[07:59] <dholbach> shadeslayer, I'd suggest filing a bug or merge proposal and pointing it out here - I'm a bit busy right now, but could maybe take a look later on - in any case your request won't be lost if you file it :)
[08:00] <shadeslayer> alrighty :)
[08:00] <shadeslayer> thanks dholbach
[08:00]  * dholbach hugs shadeslayer
[08:01] <shadeslayer> *hugs* :D
[08:04] <shadeslayer> dholbach: bug 1131079
[08:04] <ubottu> bug 1131079 in telepathy-logger (Ubuntu) "Please update telepathy-logger to 0.8" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1131079
[08:17] <dholbach> :)
[08:17] <dholbach> shadeslayer, I subscribed ubuntu-sponsors to it
[08:17] <shadeslayer> thx :)
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
[10:29] <cousteau> Just found out that Qucs has been ported to Qt4, so it could be put back on Ubuntu repositories
[10:30] <cousteau> development on that project is annoyingly slow, though
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
=== zz_jackyalcine is now known as jackyalcine
=== mitya57_ is now known as mitya57
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
[21:33] <TheLordOfTime> i've got a problem in my package: i'm trying to re-include a patch in it, but debuild -S is erroring saying that a Reversed or Previously Rejected patch was detected, and errors out.  Unfortunately, the patch needs to be included.  How can I work around the issue?
[22:01] <jtaylor> does quilt pop -a; quilt push -a work?
[22:03] <TheLordOfTime> jtaylor, quilt has no issues with it, its debuild that has issues.
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> at least, quilt on its  OWN has no issues with it
[22:04] <jtaylor> is the patch applied in the orig tar?
[22:04] <TheLordOfTime> nope.
[22:04] <jtaylor> sure?
[22:04] <jtaylor> does debian/rules have its own patching target?
[22:04]  * TheLordOfTime sighs.
[22:05] <TheLordOfTime> jtaylor, this patch worked before.  its not upstream because all it modifies is the debian/ files: the init file and the logrotate file.
[22:05] <TheLordOfTime> so that for Lucid, it works with /var/run rather than /run
[22:05] <jtaylor> you are patching debian/`
[22:05] <jtaylor> don't do that
[22:05] <TheLordOfTime> so, modify it directly, then.
[22:05] <TheLordOfTime> ... right...
[22:05] <jtaylor> yes
[22:06] <jtaylor> dpkg-source does not allow patching debian anymore I think
[22:06] <jtaylor> in 3.0 packages
[22:07] <TheLordOfTime> ehh, then there's a long term problem, and i'll have to consult with the team, because unless we can *easily* patch the init and logrotate files, every update we do (based on Debian upstream) will cause a regression.
[22:09] <jtaylor> use a vcs and merge?
[22:12] <ScottK> Patching the debian directory was never a good idea.