/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/02/25/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

wooohey guys I have a doubt about vnode. I think the inode for a specific file system is the vnode for virtual file system. Am I right?07:24
ppisatimoin07:36
woooguys please help !!07:49
wooohey guys I have a doubt about vnode. I think the inode for a specific file system is the vnode for virtual file system. Am I right?07:51
* apw yawns09:08
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
ppisatibrb09:20
cnfapw: package is working now, btw10:27
cnfapw: ugly, ugly hacks, but it works :P10:27
apwcnf, send it back, and don't forget the brick10:29
cnfindeed :P10:29
cnfand the herpes!10:29
apwtoo true10:29
apwppisati, well it hasn't crashed yet10:38
apwppisati, and none of the 'regular' oopsy things we used to see in dmesg10:38
apwppisati, now if you could just add a patch to make teh cpus 4x faster ...10:39
ppisatiapw: just wait for the new panda omap5, i heard it's so awesome (when it comes out) :)10:40
apwppisati, heh sounds good, the build will likely still running when they do :)10:41
smbapw, So just for additional info, it seems that indeed an objdump -g on the raring ddeb gives me nothing while it seems still ok for the vmlinux file. But the modules in debian/build seem to be stripped already. Got a log of that build to look at13:00
apwsmb, ok ... likely it is something to do with module signing, so perhaps i should poke it ?13:01
apwthat alll caused chaos when we first added it, as it changes where things are13:01
smbIf you have the time. I may have a bit too, but then I have not looked into the whole signing issue the first place13:02
jjohansenbjf: I'll be in at about 7:3013:11
smbapw, Hm, CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO seems to be gone13:14
smbah no13:15
smbstill there13:15
ogra_its stable enough now ... screw debugging13:15
smbapw, Interestingly only amd64 =y i386 =n13:17
apwsmb, doh ... will look into it ...13:24
smbapw, more doh... the same vmlinux has output on the raring objdump -g but nothing on precise objdump -g13:24
smbapw, probably whatever that output is, its not the things I tried to look for13:26
ppisatiapw: is your panda still ok?14:16
apwppisati, yes and no panics indeed no dmesg messages since 13s after boot14:18
apwppisati, and it has been up 4 hours14:18
ppisatiapw: nice, then we can safely assume that patch fixed it14:18
apwppisati, i would say so, about 15m was the best i got before14:18
rtg_ppisati, apw is that with a DT kernel ?14:18
apwrtg_, thats the 'unified' kernel14:19
rtg_DT == device tree kernel14:19
ppisatirtg_: our img don't use DT by default14:19
ppisatirtg_: but if you modify the uEnv.txt, it works14:19
apwbut they are unified :)14:19
rtg_cool14:19
rtg_apw, on a different topic, shouldn't 'apt-get autoremove' be removing old kernel in raring ?14:21
apwrtg_, if you didn't install them by hand yes14:21
rtg_hmm14:21
rtg_apw, ok, looks like it removes them but doesn't purge them14:22
apwrtg_, does headers or image contain anything a purge would make go away any harder14:23
rtg_apw, huh ? a 'dpkg -P' makes the listing go away14:23
apwahh you mean you can still see the old package names yeah14:23
rtg_apw, so, some are marked 'rc', but most are still 'ii'. the 'ii' kernels are the ones I would expect to get removed, but I may have installed them by hand14:25
apwrighjt if you installed it by hand, then it is marked as permenant14:25
rtg_apw, I've seen them cleanup on gomeisa and tangerine, so that capability must have been backported14:26
apwapt-mark showmanual linux-\*14:26
apwrtg_, yes it has, that will show which it thinks you installed manually14:26
apwrtg_, yes it has, that will show which it thinks you installed manually14:27
apwapt-mark showmanual linux-\*14:27
* smb thinks there is a flaw in the matrix14:32
apwyeah :)14:42
rtg_3.9 is telling me my SB server is insane. arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:324 topology_sane.isra.2+0x6f/0x80()14:48
rtg_sched: CPU #1's llc-sibling CPU #0 is not on the same node! [node: 1 != 0]. Ignoring dependency.14:48
=== kentb-afk is now known as kentb
xnoxreboot syscall supports passing a string which is used as rebootcommand further down the stack. Thus for example on nexus7 one can "reboot bootloader" to reboot into fastboot/flashing mode.15:34
xnoxis there any way to discover supported reboot commands from the running kernel/sysfs/etc?15:34
xnoxBecause we may want to expose these features to the user in the future of e.g. UEFI Fastboot modes and/or booting multiple operating systems on devices (e.g. reboot into recovery)15:35
xnoxapw ^ would you know about this?15:36
* xnox got lost in per-arch trees in the kernel sources.15:36
* ogasawara back in 2015:45
=== kentb is now known as kentb-afk
avoineppisati: Hi, if you have 2 min, I would like to test your multi-plateform kernel on a imx6 board and I have some questions about the installation.16:11
ppisatiavoine: i'm here, shot16:11
avoineDo you know if there is some documentation about the u-boot part? 16:11
avoineRight now, I have the linaro's U-boot and image installed from here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards/MX6QSabreLite16:11
avoinebut I think it won't work unless I update the u-boot for ubuntu16:12
ppisatiavoine: we never released an official ubuntu img for imx616:15
ppisatiavoine: do you have uboot on imx6's flash? and do you read the kernel from sd?16:16
ppisatiavoine: if yes, you should be ok16:16
avoineyeah it boot from SD16:17
avoineppisati: ^16:17
avoineppisati: ok, I'll try to update the kernel to the latest one and see if it boot16:18
ppisatiavoine: would you use the .deb? or would you build the zimage from src?16:19
avoineppisati: the deb16:19
ppisatiavoine: in the first case, flash-kernel will complain (-omap doesn't match your arch)16:19
ppisatiavoine: so be aware that you need some hacking on it16:20
ppisatiavoine: ping me and i'll try to dig up what exactly do you have to do16:20
ppisatiavoine: if you can't figure out16:20
avoineppisati: ok, thanks16:20
=== kentb-afk is now known as kentb
* ppisati goes for some sweating... later...17:04
doanacbjf: i've added a comment to bug 1092924.17:06
ubot2Launchpad bug 1092924 in UTAH "Cobbler install of recent raring-desktop images failing" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/109292417:06
doanacI think the easiest way to help move forward would be to give you access so that you can re-produce and poke around.17:07
bjfdoanac, the easiest way was for you to find a kernel / iso that was successfully working. 17:08
doanacbjf: i can't find an ISO that does work17:08
=== henrix is now known as henrix_
=== henrix_ is now known as henrix
* rtg_ -> lunch18:27
=== sabayonuser2 is now known as Tuxkalle
=== henrix is now known as henrix_
* rtg_ -> EOD21:08
infinityzequence: Around?21:37
zequenceinfinity: Yep21:37
infinityzequence: Once bjf sorts out the bugs so you're working on the right one, there's a fairly urgent (quantal-only) lowlatency rebase needed.21:37
bjfzequence, bug 1132942 is the one to use, i'll fix any others21:38
ubot2Launchpad bug 1132942 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux-lowlatency: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/113294221:38
zequenceOk, so I'll do a rebase shortly and let you know when it's done21:40
infinitybjf: According to your lts-q changelog, you seem to have broken your stated "use the oldest bug" rule. ;)21:41
infinitybjf: (Not that it matter, just make sure you close the right ones)21:41
bjfinfinity, i refused to wait so i created that one by hand :-)21:41
infinitybjf: But it's newer than the others. :P21:41
bjfinfinity, i was busy working on it and had not refreshed so i missed the fact that shankbot created it for me21:42
infinityAhh.21:42
infinityTwice, no less.21:42
infinityOverzealous bot.21:42
bjfimpatient me21:44
zequenceinfinity: Who's doing the pulling?21:46
infinitybjf or apw, I imagine.21:46
infinityapw: If you're around and feel like helping zequence.21:46
zequenceapw: quantal source ready to be pulled21:47
bjfzequence, where from?21:47
zequenceIt's at https://github.com/zequence/ubuntu-quantal-lowlatency.git21:48
zequencebranch lowlatency21:48
infinityzequence: You should make the bug reference an actual closure.21:49
infinityie: have the magic sequence "LP: #1132942"21:49
ubot2Launchpad bug 1132942 in Kernel SRU Workflow "linux-lowlatency: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/113294221:49
zequenceAh, sorry. I messed it up this time.21:50
infinityYou messed it up last time too, by omitting the space.  I had to close your bug by hand. :)21:50
zequenceinfinity: There's a bot scanning for that, right?21:50
infinityzequence: Not a bot, per se.  When you build a source package, things with the proper syntax get torn out of the changelog and put in a special field in .changes21:52
infinityzequence: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/132343151/linux-lts-quantal_3.5.0-25.39~precise1_source.changes21:52
infinityzequence: ^-- See "Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed:" in there.21:52
infinityzequence: The archive then obeys that to auto-close bugs on accept.21:52
infinityzequence: So, broken syntax means no closures.  If you use vim, it actually highlights bug closures in gold, so they show up as correct.21:53
bjfzequence, is your tree the authoritative tree, we are missing a number of rebases from out git repo. does apw normally just build and upload a package based on your git repo?21:53
zequenceinfinity: I see. I'll try to be more careful with the changelog. Should I make some changes, and reapply the last git tag? 21:53
zequencebjf: I don't know how apw does. I know one time (again a problem with the changelog :( ), he added one commit to change that, and uploaded it to his own tree at kernel.ubuntu.com21:54
bjfzequence, ack21:55
zequence..or pushed21:55
bjfinfinity, looks like i don't have upload rights for linux-signed-lts-quantal :-(21:56
infinitybjf: Irksome.  Ask stgraber to fix that?21:57
infinitystgraber: ^21:57
stgraberbjf: added21:58
bjfstgraber, can you check sconklin as well? thanks21:58
stgraberbjf: anyone with rights to the packageset will be fine now. That source simply wasn't in the set.21:58
bjfstgraber, ah, thanks21:59
bjfinfinity, do i need to do a new package or can i just try again?21:59
stgraberbjf: just retry22:02
bjfstgraber, thanks22:02
zequenceinfinity: bjf: I've deleted the tag, and redoing it now. Hope that doesn't mess anything up for you?22:03
bjfzequence, nope, i'm going to leave for apw and then i'll talk to him about how he normally does this22:03
bjfzequence, i'd think that if your tree was authoritative, you'd just be producing souce packages which he could sponsor for you22:04
zequencebjf: I think that's the plan, yes. For now, he has been doing the packages.22:06
bjfzequence, ack22:06
=== arges_ is now known as arges
bjfinfinity, ok, i just reuploaded the same pkg again that was rejected, i guess i'll roll the version and upload another22:33
bjfinfinity, this is a pita22:36
infinitybjf: Hrm?  Shouldn't have needed to rev the version if the first was rejected.22:37
bjfinfinity, actually, it wasn't the signed pkg that was rejected22:40
bjfinfinity, you still around?23:22
bjfinfinity, i think i know what i did, i uploaded it to the wrong pocket23:23
infinitybjf: Oh?  Pockets don't matter to PPAs.23:27
infinitybjf: Oh, you uploaded directly to the archive. :)23:28
bjfinfinity, yes, i'm out of practice23:29
infinitybjf: Want me to reject that one, and we can use the PPA instead?  Doesn't actually matter to me, we can just use the archive one.23:29
infinitybjf: It has to rebuild in the archive ANYWAY (we don't copy those binaries from the PPA), so no big deal.23:29
infinitybjf: I'll just accept the one in the queue after I copy the kernel.23:29
infinitybjf: Work for you?23:30
* infinity -> food.23:30
bjfinfinity, linux-lts-quantal_3.5.0-25.39~precise1 this was rejected and the signed-lts pkg is waiting23:30
infinityYeah, I'm looking at the queue right now.23:30
bjfinfinity, if you can make it just work, do so, otherwise let me know if i need to re-upload23:31
infinitySo, what I'm saying is that when the linux-lts-quantal in the PPA is done building, I'll copy it, and accept the linux-signed-lts-quantal that's in the queue.23:31
infinityThat'll work fine.23:31
infinityI'll get to it after dinner.23:31
bjfok, i'll not do anything at this point, i'll be around if you need me to do anything23:32
bjfinfinity, ^23:32
=== kentb is now known as kentb-out
infinitybjf: Err, what I need you to do is not botch the linux-lts-quantal upload.  I didn't look at that carefully. :/23:52
bjfinfinity, ack23:53
bjfinfinity, do i need to roll the version number or just upload correctly this time?23:53
infinityMaybe I can fix that with a copy.23:53
infinitybjf: Can you try running this (I don't have rights to the PPA) http://paste.ubuntu.com/5566371/23:56
infinitybjf: Assuming you have ubuntu-archive-tools checked out somewhere.23:57
bjfack23:57
infinitybjf: You can't reupload, since it's the same version, but a copy should work, since the binaries never built.23:57
infinity(Depending on whatever artificial constraints the PPA may have)23:58
infinityIf that doesn't work, I'll cheat and copy it to the security PPA to build it there. :P23:58
bjfTraceback (most recent call last):23:59
bjf  File "./copy-package", line 27, in <module>23:59
bjf    from ubuntutools.question import YesNoQuestion23:59
bjfImportError: No module named ubuntutools.question23:59
bjfinfinity, ^23:59
infinityThat can't be a recent checkout of ubuntu-archive-tools...23:59
bjfinfinity, i'm on precise by the way23:59
bjfi just did: bzr branch bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!