[01:36] <darkxst> robert_ancell, Hi
[01:37] <darkxst> Wondering if you could add a comment to my  membership application? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimLunn/DeveloperApplication
[01:38] <robert_ancell> darkxst, sure
[01:38] <darkxst> thanks
[02:01] <darkxst> jbicha, I guess you saw the gtk dnd fix fly by your emails?
[02:05] <darkxst> jbicha, seb128 is pretty much against having two spidermonkeys in the archive. But suggest I email ubuntu-devel list, which I tried but its awaiting moderation
[02:09] <jbicha> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel says cjwatson can approve ubuntu-devel messages
[04:45] <darkxst> jbicha, ok, pinged him
[04:47] <darkxst> oh btw, i built images today, ~+70MB up on last time
[07:43] <darkxst> ricotz, can you update to the new tarball (just to test it)
[07:44] <darkxst> http://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/mozjs17.0.0.rc0.tar.gz
[07:53] <ricotz> darkxst, sure
[07:54] <ricotz> i see they like screwing with versions, "0.0.rc0" ?
[07:54] <ricotz> darkxst, was the internal soname fixes?
[07:55] <darkxst> ricotz, thats only the tarball version
[07:55] <darkxst> mostly minimal changes, addressing code reviews, within the actual tarball
[07:56] <darkxst> for one, js shell is now installed to 'js17'
[07:58] <darkxst> ricotz, and no they wont take the soname fixes upstream
[07:59] <ricotz> to be clear i am not talking about the symlinks
[07:59] <darkxst> you are talking about i.e. mozjs-17.0.so.1.0 ?
[07:59] <ricotz> no
[08:00] <darkxst> oh the extra_dso_flags thing
[08:00] <ricotz> the internal soname should match the filename
[08:00] <ricotz> EXTRA_DSO_LDOPTS += -Wl,-soname,lib$(LIBRARY_NAME).so.0
[08:00] <ricotz> EXTRA_DSO_LDOPTS += -Wl,-soname,lib$(LIBRARY_NAME).so
[08:00] <darkxst> ricotz, it does
[08:01] <ricotz> afaics it does not
[08:01] <ricotz> it is linked as libmoz.js and renamed to libmozjs-17.0.so
[08:01] <ricotz> *libmozjs.so
[08:02] <darkxst> no only the static is renamed
[08:02] <darkxst> I checked it with objdump, and soname was correct
[08:03] <darkxst> shared library is build as  libmozjs-17.0.so
[08:05] <darkxst> $ objdump -p /opt/gnome/lib64/libmozjs-17.0.so | grep SONAME
[08:05] <darkxst>   SONAME               libmozjs-17.0.so
[08:08] <ricotz> hmm
[08:08] <darkxst> ricotz, that is without any EXTRA_DSO_LDOPTS  -soname stuff added
[08:40] <ricotz> darkxst, uploading the package
[09:10] <darkxst> ricotz, so its ok then? soname wise? afaict it is
[09:12] <ricotz> darkxst, seems so for the tarball, but for debian/ubuntu it needs to be patched
[09:13] <darkxst> ricotz, yeh I realise that, I submitted patches for that but they were rejected.
[09:14] <ricotz> pushed a whole bunch of updates, gtk contains a hack for the dnd problem with mutter
[09:16] <darkxst> ricotz, yeh I saw the dnd fix fly past
[09:17] <ricotz> havent tested it yet though
[09:17] <darkxst> yeh nor have I, was trying to test, ISO's but thats really hard with the stupid mesa bug ;(
[09:18] <ricotz> huh, ISO's, mesa bug?
[09:19] <ricotz> you mean you were checking out the iso build process for ubuntu-gnome?
[09:19] <darkxst> yes
[09:20] <ricotz> ok
[09:20] <darkxst> but there is a mesa bug, that breaks clutter in vmware
[09:20] <darkxst> I can work around that on an installed system, but not a live CD
[09:20] <ricotz> then use vbox in the meantime
[09:21] <ricotz> alright, g2g
[09:21] <darkxst> oh and there starts the fun, last time I tried, vbox was completely broken with raring kernal
[09:21] <darkxst> ok cya
[09:31] <darkxst> anyone here able to help test Ubuntu Gnome (raring) images?