| xxiao | why is package rebuild giving me permission errors? | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| xxiao | http://paste.ubuntu.com/5577868/ | 00:01 |
| xxiao | dpkg-source -x qemu-kvm_1.2.0+noroms-0ubuntu2.12.10.2.dsc gave me same errors, permission denied | 00:03 |
| sarnold | xxiao: any change if you leave off the 'fakeroot'? | 00:06 |
| xxiao | sarnold: dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b messed it up | 00:07 |
| xxiao | rebuilding qemu-nbd and see if that helps | 00:08 |
| xxiao | how do I pass -j12 to apt-get -b? | 00:08 |
| sarnold | xxiao: try DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=-j12 | 00:09 |
| === wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away | ||
| slangasek | sarnold: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=12 | 00:39 |
| slangasek | $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is keyword-based | 00:39 |
| sarnold | slangasek: ah! thanks :D | 00:40 |
| hallyn | kees: I assume you mean at add_id_mapping, to check for delayed write errors? | 03:44 |
| hallyn | not sure the id_mapping file would do that, though, in this case. (haven't checked) | 03:45 |
| xxiao | is it ok to disable beam.smp. the cpu sucker? | 04:56 |
| xxiao | is ubuntu-12.10-server-powerpc.iso 32 or 64 bit? | 05:13 |
| xxiao | i mean the filesystem | 05:13 |
| xxiao | i'm having trouble with 64bit kernel / 32bit ubuntu 12.10 on ppc | 05:13 |
| xxiao | guess it's 32bit, as it's not named ubuntu-12.10-server-powerpc64.iso, the 'server' lable confuses me... | 05:15 |
| xxiao | my issue is that 32bit qemu-nbd dislikes 32bit filesystem | 05:16 |
| xxiao | while runnning a 64bit kernel | 05:16 |
| cjwatson | xxiao: 32-bit userspace, indeed | 09:18 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| jtaylor | are old daily builds of compiz somewhere? | 14:08 |
| jtaylor | looks like the one from feb 26 broke java apps | 14:08 |
| vibhav | 21:20 < KHendrik> did I seriously just brick two phones ... | 15:58 |
| vibhav | Oops, wrong window | 15:58 |
| ejat | anyone can verify this : http://paste.ubuntu.com/5579567/ | 16:00 |
| === jbicha_ is now known as jbicha | ||
| === fenris is now known as Guest66346 | ||
| kees | hallyn: yup, and it does. | 17:02 |
| kees | i noticed while trying to write without cap_setuid | 17:03 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| IDWMaster | How do I recommend a package (library) for inclusion in one of the Ubuntu repositories? | 20:19 |
| mlankhorst | best would be to get it in debian first, then request inclusion for ubuntu | 20:19 |
| IDWMaster | So I should probably dual-boot a Debian installation? | 20:22 |
| IDWMaster | Or is there a better way | 20:22 |
| IDWMaster | Why Debian first? | 20:22 |
| slangasek | Ubuntu derives most of its packages from Debian, and getting it into Debian usually provides for more sustainable maintenance over the long term | 20:24 |
| slangasek | and if it's in Debian, more people benefit from the package's availability - Ubuntu users, but also Debian users | 20:24 |
| slangasek | but there's no need to dual-boot to get a package into Debian; you can do most development work in a chroot | 20:24 |
| slangasek | (or VM) | 20:24 |
| IDWMaster | OK | 20:25 |
| IDWMaster | So pbuilder would be a good tool for this | 20:25 |
| slangasek | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/ForUbuntuDevelopers | 20:25 |
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| runeks | anyone know why gdb is not loading symbols from files placed in /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ ? | 21:12 |
| runeks | installed via the freerdp-dbg package | 21:12 |
| === wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood | ||
| chilicuil | NCommander: hi there, sorry to bother, I was wondering if you could be able to help with bug #1113648 | 22:51 |
| ubottu | bug 1113648 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "Add a context menu entry to create a new blank file" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1113648 | 22:51 |
| Maccer | Anyone know where I can look up the maintainer for a certain package or what guidelines I need to follow so I can take over? There's a package here that hasn't been updated in quite a bit even though both there is a higher stable and unstable version. (It's an audio player) | 23:29 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: apt-cache show will show you the maintainers | 23:30 |
| Maccer | I found out through launchpad, but apparently the Debian Multimedia Maintainers group maintains this package... hrm. | 23:31 |
| penguin42 | ah, I think they have a mailing list | 23:31 |
| Maccer | But it looks like they maintain the unstable version if it. Yeah they do. Is there a way to add their unstable repository or can I only get their files through a .deb package? | 23:33 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: does packages.debian.org show a newer version ? | 23:33 |
| Maccer | Using debian unstable (sid), it shows 3.2.4 for the i386/i686/amd64 version, and I have 3.2.3, and I'm using a non-LTS Ubuntu 12.10 | 23:35 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: What does packages.ubuntu.org say ? | 23:36 |
| Maccer | What surprises though is why they don't upgrade Quantal (12.10?) to 3.3.4. It's a media player. | 23:36 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: It's probably just not happened in time; if it's in debian sid it'll probably make it into Raring (depending when it landed) | 23:36 |
| Maccer | penguin42: http://i.imgur.com/biwF6c9.png | 23:37 |
| penguin42 | erm what's that got to do with anything? | 23:37 |
| Maccer | That's packages.ubuntu.org. | 23:38 |
| Maccer | I have no idea why that's displaying. | 23:38 |
| penguin42 | oops - .com! | 23:38 |
| Maccer | For a second there I thought my DNS server was hijacked. Seems like they rewrite the URL so as to make it work with the subdomain. | 23:39 |
| * xnox ponders how does doko make source packages with @ubuntu.com without updating Maintainer fields to say Ubuntu Developers, and whether that's bad or just ugly. | 23:39 | |
| Maccer | Seems like quantal is 3.2.3. Yeah but this is odd because 3.2.4 came out more than 4 months ago I believe. | 23:39 |
| Maccer | Plus I'd expect the unstable version 3.3.x to be on Quantal. | 23:40 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: That's not how it works | 23:40 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: So quantal came out in October, and it's version won't be updated | 23:40 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: Quantal will have taken the 'current' debian version a month or so before that, probably around August-September | 23:41 |
| Maccer | Mh, so what are the release cycles for ubuntu then? It's just like debian but more frequently updated? I thought that was LTS. | 23:41 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: Every 6 months and there's a timetable soemwhere where you can see when the sync's happen | 23:42 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: There's talk of moving to a rolling release; the details I don't know | 23:43 |
| Maccer | Ah, that's a shame. Has there been a release model in linux distributions that's a hybrid bleeding edge or rolling? | 23:43 |
| penguin42 | Maccer: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RaringRingtail/ReleaseSchedule so the sync from Debian happened in Feb | 23:44 |
| Maccer | Stable libraries and core libraries, but unstable things like music players. | 23:44 |
| xnox | Maccer: apart from at the moment we are actively discussing on ubuntu-devel to turn raring into a rolling release. | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
