[00:31] I feel dirty for upgrading to raring. Oh well it's only xubuntu. [00:32] hey raring is ok [00:35] 1.2GB upgrade. Must have changed a lot. And probably some of my PPA-derived software probably was downgraded/upgraded. [00:50] Am I redownloading everything or something? I already have firefox 19.0. [00:56] Maccer: do you have firefox 19 build against quantal libraries, or against raring libraries?! [00:56] each release gets its own firefox..... [00:56] apart from like first couple of week of the new release. [00:56] I can't check at the moment, I just caught a glimpse. I was surprised the libraries weren't backwards compatible or something like that. === notgary_ is now known as notgary [01:57] kees: jinkeys, that's unkind (delaying error) - thanks :) === ubott2 is now known as ubottu === komputes_ is now known as komputes === jackyalcine is now known as Guest69145 === Guest69145 is now known as Jacky === wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away === Jacky is now known as jalcine [05:44] is there a way to get the split out patches from http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/raring/subtitleripper [05:44] this diff http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/s/subtitleripper/subtitleripper_0.3.4-0.5ubuntu2.diff.gz seems to have all the patches together [05:46] mether: there are three patches in debian/patches in that diff [05:46] mether: i.e., that (top-level) diff creates three patch files. [05:47] mether: if you extract the source package (`apt-get source subtitleripper`, or dget the .dsc and then dpkg-source -x), it'll be easier === Atlantic778 is now known as Atlantic777 [05:53] geofft, thanks but i am not running ubuntu/debian now. is there an alternative way? [05:54] mether: yes [05:54] Chipzz, can you elaborate? [05:54] mether: get the .tar.(gz|bz2), extract, get the .diff.gz, patch the extracted directory [05:54] mether: sure, download the .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz, untar the former, unzip the latter | patch -p1 or something [05:55] ok. thanks! [05:55] (sorry, on a crappy connection, serious lag on my ssh connection) [05:55] mether: dpkg-dev also may or may not exist on your distro, if you're on non-Ubuntu Linux [05:55] geofft, in fact, i do seem to have it. i will take a look [06:01] Chipzz, geofft, got it. thanks again === rperier_ is now known as rperier === fisted__ is now known as fisted === iulian_ is now known as iulian === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage === stokachu_ is now known as stokachu [15:22] Mirv: hi, here? === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia [17:41] I am building a custom kernel via make-kpkg but my symlinks in /lib/modules/*/build are never correct on the installed system, they always point to build directory on the system I built the kernel on [17:41] and I noticed the postinst/preinst/etc scripts from /usr/share/kernel-package are different then the ones inside the official ubuntu kernel packages [17:42] is there any recommended approach here when building a custom kernel to get those symlinks correct ? its cause dkms to hate me [17:44] i've also tried different options in /etc/kernel-img.conf, but it doesn't seem to matter [17:47] dirtyfreebooter: I doubt this qualifies as the right channel for your questions. Your questions are support questions, this channel is for the development OF ubuntu only. [17:48] dirtyfreebooter: Perhaps #ubuntu-kernel ? [17:48] and what penguin42 said [17:48] k, thanks [17:49] dirtyfreebooter: as an aside, I don't think make-kpkg is a supprted way of building kernels [17:50] ok, that is strange, as multiple pages on ubuntu.com show make-kpkg as the way to build ubuntu kernel from ubuntu git repo.. I'll ask in #ubuntu-kernel though. thanks [17:51] I *think* the correct way of doing things is apt-get source linux-... and rebuilding that [17:51] correct as in: officially supported [17:52] although I must say the whole situation *IS* confusing [22:01] c [23:17] hello [23:18] sorry [23:20] I would like to ask this one question : I work on both Ubuntu box and Debian box, and I was seeking for a "language-selector-gnome" package at Debian when I realized it's an Ubuntu only package. How come is that ? Aren't programs supposed to be packaged at Debian before being brought to Ubuntu ? and aren't Ubuntu packages supposed to be also available at Debian ? [23:20] melodie: see e.g. unity for another counter-example :) [23:21] sarnold could you explain to the non English native I am ? [23:21] do you mean: [23:21] Unity is not available at Debian either ? [23:21] melodie: correct [23:22] ok, but that is a very special desktop environment, whereas having an easy tool to switch language can be more than handy : a matter of being able to use a distro, a spin, whatever ? [23:23] (I _am_ a little surprised about it, I expected someone would have packaged it for debian.. but it doesn't happen on at least one "core" ubuntu package...) [23:23] :s [23:25] do you know of a chan where Debian developers/packagers go preferably ? [23:25] melodie: hrm. I thought dpkg-reconfigure locales was supposed to provide a nice interface for changing the system-wide locales, but that just rebuilt the locales :/ [23:25] I would like to ask them the same question [23:25] configuring the language in Debian is a pain in the bottom [23:26] here my testimonial: Scorpio RC4 - obsession - languages - http://beta.linuxvillage.net/index.php/topic,171.0.html [23:27] melodie: http://wiki.debian.org/IRC/ [23:27] I had reconfigured the install completely, and the apps get back to English for at any time, after an update, and such [23:27] jbicha thank you! [23:27] melodie: heh, /list #debian-* scrolled outside of my scrollback on OFTC. I'd try just #debian on irc.oftc.net first... [23:28] I am not sure... some there just yell about "frankendebian" spins. :-( [23:29] heh, that's not very helpful :( [23:29] not helpful, and not polite. [23:29] melodie: are you confident your application is supposed to have up-to-date french translations? [23:29] I happened to ask something about hem, antiX once, that's how I was welcome. [23:29] melodie: maybe #debian-fr would be nicer? [23:30] it is smaller, anyway, that sometimes leads to more polite. [23:30] well, confident yes, because I have the same in Archlinux and because when I reinstall the app after checking all configs, it's in French again. [23:30] sarnold this is a good idea. thank you [23:31] I'll add it to my favorites and go tomorrow as it begins to be really late here now [23:31] melodie: I would expect the application to check your LC_* and LANG environment variables and select the language to show right then and there -- does your locale environment variables change away from french? [23:31] ah, yes, so it is. :) better luck on monday vs sunday, too... [23:31] no, locale is fr-FR_UTF8 [23:31] yes, that's right [23:32] I believe language-selector-gnome is designed around Ubuntu's language packs which aren't used by most other distros [23:32] jbicha possible - well another example, [23:32] software center is Ubuntu made, but is available at Debian too [23:33] I'll look for some package from Semplice if none is available specifically for Debian [23:33] I heard about a tool [23:36] thanks a lot. :) [23:36] have fun :) [23:37] I guess we do; at linuxvillage we make spins of Debian and Ubuntu to create ready to use versions with Openbox and not much more around. we like to go light, but easy to use. :) [23:58] melodie: #debian-devel on irc.debian.org iirc