=== cjohnston_ is now known as cjohnston [01:03] * ogra_ wonders why grub-probe runs (and fails indeed) during the edubuntu builds [01:05] The kernel packages are being installed in the wrong phase [01:05] I haven't worked out why yet [01:06] Was vaguely on my list to care about tomorrow [01:07] ah, its the first time i bothered to scroll down in the log :) [01:07] they roll in since a while already [01:07] Yeah [01:07] I guess it's a new dependency somewhere or similar [01:07] But just a guess === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === ochosi_ is now known as ochosi [09:02] hmpf, so whats libcolorhug1 and why does it break all images for all arches :P [09:04] It's hugging your images until they suffocate? [09:04] lol [09:05] i see doko fixed anothetr issue with colord ... and RAOF before him ... neither of them seems to have touched that dep though [09:05] Nothing depends on libcolorhug... [09:05] * infinity goes to look at logs. [09:08] Oh, curious. I guess colord did for a while. [09:09] well, it surely did when the image builds ran :) [09:11] Hrm, yes, my laptop's living slightly in the past. [09:12] Then again, libcolorhug1 is now in main. [09:13] So, I guess that got fixed this morning. [09:13] Probably just more fallout from the override-loss-on-migration bug. :/ [09:14] ok === henrix_ is now known as henrix === zequence_ is now known as zequence === tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk [11:12] will there be a freeze this friday, or are things being modified for the rolling release? [11:13] brendand: I have no idea [11:13] brendand: we will have uds tomorrow and on wednesday, i'd expect things to be cleared up by thursday. [11:13] yeah [11:13] UDS should tell [11:13] xnox: there's no relevent discussion in the UDS schedule, though [11:14] hm?! [11:14] am I blind? [11:14] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-1303 has things like monthly milestones etc [11:14] which clearly is rolling related [11:15] monthly snapshot is wednesday at 2pm [11:16] hrm, I swear it wasn't scheduled when I looked earlier [11:16] there is: foundations-1303-monthly-snapshots [11:16] and rolling-kernel spec. [11:16] and "rolling kernel maintenance" [11:16] tumbleweed, yeah, I just did a bunch of scheduling, no client session was scheduled either [11:16] heh [11:16] snap [11:16] most of the sessions are on the schedule now [11:16] let me know if any is missing [11:17] I thought the rolling thing was officially still a proposal [11:17] yet all the sessions on tuesday assume it's happening [11:18] tumbleweed, what? [11:18] hmm [11:18] It should STILL be officially a proposal to the Ubuntu community.... [11:18] it's a proposal [11:19] it doesn't prevent to discuss details of how things should be adapted to make that happen [11:19] I mean that I'd expect a session like "should we move to a rolling/LTS release model?" [11:20] is that really something that can happen in a session? [11:20] UDS is the typical venue for such discussions [11:20] proposals without action plans are not proposals but wishful thinking. [11:20] seems like an endless discussion with too many people having different opinions that will never give any concrete output [11:20] given the limitations of G+ hangouts, I'm not too concerned about that possibility [11:20] Laney, well, UDS is the right venue, but you better want to split that in subtopics [11:21] anyway, we need to know by Thursday whether Feature Freeze is happening [11:21] right [11:21] seb128: I'd have expected a session like Laney describes to be the first thing on the agenda, with split-out sessions being scheduled from it [11:21] * ogra_ only saw positive feedback for rolling everywhere ... apart from the flavours on ubuntu-devel [11:21] tumbleweed, anyone is welcome to create a blueprint [11:21] we have, of course, already had a lot of discussion so we know many of the details we want to talk about [11:22] tumbleweed, seems like nobody did so far, that includes you ;-) [11:22] fair, but I'm not the one driving this [11:22] e.g feel free to create one I would say [11:22] who is? [11:22] rick? [11:23] right, maybe ping him when he gets online [11:23] though, I guess if canonical is convinced that they aren't supporting non-LTS releases, there's not much to discuss [11:24] seems like it would be easy to add that session in the first foundation slot [11:24] and move the +1 one to 6pm [11:25] Riddell: are you going to be around for this UDS/ [11:25] I think that it would be a really good idea to have a flavours/rolling session ... [11:25] ++ [11:27] Laney: I guess so [11:28] Laney: it's on my todo list for today to work out what session kubuntu needs [11:28] fair [11:28] Laney: if you register one that'll shorten my todo list :) [11:28] I just expect it's something that would benefit from some pushing from your end [11:28] well I'd rather not as I'm not involved with any flavour [11:29] other than being concerned for their success ;-) [11:29] fair enough === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik [13:15] are the "daily CD heath check" mini-reports published on p.c.c/~ubuntu-archive/ somewhere? at least as a single file which gets updated similar to raring_probs? [13:23] xnox, i think they are only maikled by default [13:23] *mailed [13:26] ogra_: it would be nice to "| tee somewhere/health-check.txt |" in whatever mails it ;-) [13:26] livecd-rootfs, feel free to hack :) [13:27] in the BuildLiveCD script [13:49] Eh, no, it's not in BuildLiveCD [13:49] it's in lp:ubuntu-cdimage bin/daily-checks [13:50] You're thinking of the livefs build failure mails [13:54] cjwatson, oops, yeah, sorry [15:00] hi all. any chance we could get the tomboy SRUs for bug #1115460 pushed to updates today? i know it's not quite 7 days yet, but would be nice to get it pushed out to reduce the chances of people trying to set up notes sync with a server that won't exist in a couple days. [15:00] Launchpad bug 1115460 in tomboy (Ubuntu Quantal) "Ubuntu One notes sync is going away" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1115460 === lynxman_ is now known as lynxman === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti === jbicha_ is now known as jbicha [17:15] infinity: hi, can you approve nvidia-graphics-drivers-313-updates and nvidia-settings-313-updates in NEW, please? === henrix is now known as henrix_ === henrix_ is now known as henrix === mmrazik is now known as mmrazik|afk === shadeslayer is now known as evilshadeslayer === mmrazik|afk is now known as mmrazik [19:47] cjwatson: why do all the Ubuntu announcements make me a sad panda? [20:46] any SRU members around who could look at the apt in precise? It's needed to fix the mess that the lts-quantal stack made of things for multiarch [20:47] (precise-proposed unapproved queue) === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti [20:59] Is anyone on the SRU team able to move bug 780602 to Fix Released? [21:00] Launchpad bug 780602 in OEM Priority Project precise "nm-applet leaks memory and stops functioning after a while" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/780602 [21:00] I've verified that the memory leak is plugged === henrix is now known as henrix_ === seb128__ is now known as seb128 [22:56] slangasek: Accepted, and thanks for following up with the auto-remove fix, I was about to do the same thing. ;) [23:02] slangasek: I can haz the same upload to Q, or should I do that one myself when I wake up? [23:03] infinity: well, I'm regarding it as lower priority for quantal === evilshadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer [23:56] blitzkrieg3: looking over the bug log for bug #780602, there's a comment from bdmurray about an NM crash that happens only with the precise-proposed version [23:56] Launchpad bug 780602 in OEM Priority Project precise "nm-applet leaks memory and stops functioning after a while" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/780602 [23:56] blitzkrieg3: so if there's a regression, we don't really want to publish it... [23:56] slangasek: yes, but cyphermox says it's unrelated [23:57] slangasek: if we can't publish it, can we pull it? [23:57] slangasek: I'm fine with publishing it [23:57] blitzkrieg3: where has he said that? it's not in the bug log [23:57] slangasek: I know, it was over irx [23:57] irc [23:58] I would prefer to have these comments in the historical record :) [23:59] slangasek: it's funny, I was just complaining earlier today how no one puts enough info into lp [23:59] slangasek: if it makes sense I'll circle back with cyphermox and bdmurray and tell them to update the bug