=== wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood === wedgwood is now known as wedgwood_away === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === Sweetsha1k is now known as Sweetshark [09:03] StevenK: does LP have caching in place for blueprints? [09:03] czajkowski: caching in what sense? [09:05] lifeless: 16:41 < cjohnston> Is there any chance that https://launchpad.net/sprints/uds-1303/+temp-meeting-export gets cached? [09:05] 16:46 < cjohnston> czajkowski: twice now, it hasn't imported a user who is marked as attending, I visit that url via my browser, and all of a sudden summit picks it up [09:05] I don't remember that being memcached [09:06] it would rather defeat the purpose, as its an API [09:06] I've never seen/heard of it before so wasn't sure [09:06] however, it may be. I don't have LP's source checked out atm... [09:06] so if it's not LP being naughty then it'd be summit. [09:06] lifeless: cheers [09:06] also nice replies on -devel [09:06] czajkowski: thanks :) [09:10] lifeless: get a chance to listen into any of the sessions? [09:11] czajkowski: listened to the one with rick colin etc on rolling release today [09:12] czajkowski: seems to be massive confusion between rick and colin (just to pick an arbitrary pair) about whether the rolling release is for user or devs or testers or .... [09:12] nods [09:12] also terminology also seems to be different to a developer as oposed to a end user I found [09:12] but still interesting to hear it all sounded out tbh [09:13] personally I think bite the bullet, find out where the pain points are and iterate on fixing the systems quickly [09:13] and make breaking things be considered really socially unacceptable [09:15] nods [09:15] i'm running raring now and I think it's by far the best I've run ever and it's not even released [09:15] I should probably blog about it [09:16] I do a daily update has broken, couple of quirks I've found, but nothing actually breakable. I am in favour of the rolling releases as I do think it's the right thing to do though,just unsure about the timing [09:38] lifeless: Squid [09:38] If the requesting user isn't authenticated [09:38] wgrant: bad headers on the page? [09:39] cjohnston: ^ [09:49] wgrant: lifeless so squid is probably causing it? is that what i understand? [09:51] cjohnston: yes; just use an authenticated session rather than anonymous [09:51] cjohnston: If the request is unauthenticated then it may get slightly stale data. [09:52] we don't have that ability right now. any chance summit can bypass squid for today? [09:55] cjohnston: Just send any cookie at all [09:55] I think that should work [09:55] If not, sending an arbitrary value as the launchpad auth cookie will [09:55] wgrant: i don't want to make changes during uds [09:55] We can't make any changes on our end. [09:56] Isn't Summit usually authenticated? [09:56] cjohnston: why is only an issue at this uds and not prior ones? [09:57] dunno [09:57] something ye've done? [09:57] changed? [09:57] there hasntbeen any changes to that code [10:03] Launchpad's caching behaviour has not changed in a very long time. [11:28] I have a whole new appreciate of what builders do and how fast they do it :) === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha [13:13] hey for example some po files show all translator names, but po files that i download from launchpad translations service only shows last translator [13:13] example: http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/trunk/l10n-kde4/tr/messages/kde-workspace/kwin.po [13:13] how can i get full list? [13:23] I just got a mail about a rejected copy: [13:23] Launchpad encountered an error during the following operation: copying a package. bovo 4:4.10.1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10~ppa1 in quantal (Cannot copy restricted files to a public archive without explicit unembargo option.) [13:23] what do I need to do to get it copied? [13:29] nevermind, it seems I missed that option in the API [14:22] could someone try to make https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/backports/+packages accessible again? [14:22] OOPS-99f58a2ef24fd472b78419cf9ee1a867 [14:22] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-99f58a2ef24fd472b78419cf9ee1a867 === wedgwood_away is now known as wedgwood [16:52] Rejected: [16:52] PPA uploads must be for the RELEASE pocket ...... what does this mean? [16:53] dkliban: It means upload to quantal, not quantal-proposed (for example) [16:56] maxb: is this defined in the changelog? [16:56] dkliban: yes [16:57] maxb: i have precise-backports .... why is that not allowed? i am new to packaging for ubuntu [16:58] PPAs don't support multiple pockets [16:58] So, just drop the -backports bit [16:58] maxb: thanks! === Mkaysi is now known as Ciblia === Ciblia is now known as Mkaysi [19:51] To request a project group, do I have to do anything else besides what I've done here at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/223568 ? [19:53] !help [19:53] Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-) See also !patience [19:53] !patience [19:53] Don't feel ignored and repeat your question quickly; if nobody knows your answer, nobody will answer you. While you wait, try searching https://help.ubuntu.com or http://ubuntuforums.org or http://askubuntu.com/ [19:54] To request aproject group, do I have to do anything else besides submit my request at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/223568 [19:54] probably not [19:54] someone will get to it [19:54] you don't need to repeat the question (and it's only been 3 minutes) [19:54] dobey: how long does a request take before it is processed? [19:55] not sure. but yesterday/today was UDS, so some people may be off their normal timezones. probably no more than a day or two normally [19:58] Quick question in the request I asked to change one of the project's launchpad IDs and make the old one the project group's ID is that possible? And if I only have two projects(client and server) is a project group necessary? [20:24] i'm not sure [21:34] erm, billkd, were you hear before asking about project groups? [21:34] i seem to remember seeing someone else asking a similar question about that one