[02:28] <nobuto> Could anyone nominate Bug #1096546 to quantal for SRU?
[02:28] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1096546 in java-package (Ubuntu) "Failed to work with jdk7u10. No matching plugin was found" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1096546
[02:40] <micahg> nobuto: done
[02:42] <nobuto> micahg: Thanks!
[13:17] <luv> hey ther - I was thinking I could help with ubuntu online accounts
[13:17] <luv>  I would like to add a feature to log out (that is not just disable/enable an account) but discard the token and all so a new login is required
[13:17] <luv> kinda regression not having this feature in but patching apps to use UOA instead of they auth mechanism (because the apps usually support log outs)
[13:18] <luv> so
[13:18] <luv> who should I talk to? is there an irc channel for UOA ?
[13:18] <luv>  oh sorry, wrong channel
[13:18] <mitya57> luv: maybe #ubuntu-unity
[13:28] <luv> unity? ;-)
[19:44] <priteshjain_> Hello Is this the right place to talk about ubuntu network bug?
[19:53] <robru> priteshjain_, depends. do you just need help fixing a problem? #ubuntu is better for support. this channel is more about, if you need help triaging the bug on launchpad
[19:57] <priteshjain_> robru: I actually found a solution to a bug in ubuntu which i faced somewhat weird solution so needed to clarify
[19:57] <robru> do you know the bug number describing the issue, priteshjain_ ?
[19:58] <priteshjain_> I just posted a comment to a similar bug
[19:58] <priteshjain_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/456612/comments/58
[19:58] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 456612 in modemmanager "network manager does not connect through CDMA 3G after upgrade; fix available -- Huawei EC1260" [Medium,Incomplete]
[19:58] <priteshjain_> I just wanted to know what exactly nm-online and nm-tool does
[19:59] <priteshjain_> as it magically fixed my modem detection bug
[19:59] <robru> priteshjain_, ok, so you might want to shoot an email to cyphermox. he's the main networkmanager maintainer, would know all about that, and also would know about including your fix in ubuntu
[20:00] <priteshjain_> robru: thanks a lot I will
[20:00] <robru> also I'll assign that bug to him ;-)
[20:02] <priteshjain_> robru: there are lots of bugs revolving around this problem its this solves it it would be a great help for us all bt I still doubt about it reading the man pages for nm-online and nm-tool
[20:02] <priteshjain_> robru: thanks
[20:03] <robru> priteshjain_, ok, you're welcome.
[20:04] <priteshjain_> robru: one last thing can you help me with the email of cyphermox
[20:04] <priteshjain_> or a way to get in touch with him
[20:32] <cyphermox> yo!
[20:32] <robru> cyphermox, hey
[20:32] <robru> cyphermox, sorry for all the spam ;-)
[20:33] <cyphermox> priteshjain_: nm-online and nm-tool just take the status info from NM and print it
[20:33] <cyphermox> np
[20:33] <cyphermox> that's why I idle here for ;)
[20:34] <robru> cyphermox, if you read his bug comment he mentions installing some package and then that causing his nic to start working, I think.
[20:35] <robru> dunno if that's relevant to help you fix anything in NM
[20:36] <cyphermox> nah, gnome-ppp or wvdial have nothing to do with any of this
[20:36] <cyphermox> unless in the off chance that one of them ships one extra file that gets dropped in /etc/ppp; but then the modem would be detected anyway, just unable to connect
[20:37] <cyphermox> I suspect the actual issue was rather that usb-modeswitch was very slow to run for that particular device
[20:40] <cyphermox> otherwise, there has been additional changes like downgrading MM a whole lot, which may or may not work well on precise
[20:40] <cyphermox> I wouldn't try it, given that the API is likely to be different enough for NM to not agree to bring up the modem
[20:42] <priteshjain_> cyphermox:  I had this issue from last more than  6 months now  but this just resolves it
[20:42] <cyphermox> priteshjain_: sorry, I can't explain why this would change anything
[20:42] <priteshjain_> I know its all weird but I worked on multiple machines thats what is amazing :D
[20:42] <cyphermox> there has to have been some other change, a different kernel, or whatnot
[20:43] <cyphermox> but if you can reproduce the failure mode and file a new bug for your particular issue then we'll be able to reproduce it
[20:43] <cyphermox> (and fix it)
[20:43] <priteshjain_> cyphermox: I tried it with 3.5 and 3.8 works on both
[20:44] <priteshjain_> Its never got detected on any linux kernels earlier but after this it works on both versions
[20:45] <priteshjain_> I had tried it on a fresh 12:10 install
[20:45] <priteshjain_> too
[20:47] <priteshjain_> I know this can be all crap but it means a lot for me as I had been using ppp libs to overcome this issue which always seemed crapy to me and also unreliable
[20:47] <priteshjain_> may be I will try some fresh install and try again
[20:54] <priteshjain_> cyphermox: thanks for all help will be leaving now too late 2:30 am :)
[20:55] <priteshjain_> robru: thanks
[20:55] <cyphermox> ok
[20:55] <cyphermox> feel free to ping me if you run into similar problems again
[20:55] <priteshjain_> cyphermox: sure thanks
[23:05] <bkerensa> Can someone have a look at Bug #1120704 I think its a good candidate for wont fix
[23:05] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1120704 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu does not open OpenDocument and MSOffice files in LibreOffice if installed" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1120704
[23:09] <micahg> bkerensa: I think it's a valid bug
[23:10] <micahg> I agree with mr_pouit's assessment though
[23:10] <bkerensa> micahg: wat
[23:10] <bkerensa> micahg: if we accept the patch we would change the expected behavior which would be undesired?
[23:11] <micahg> bkerensa: I think the idea is that it should be per session overrideable
[23:11] <bkerensa> I see
[23:11] <bkerensa> It does not seem his patch does that
[23:11] <bkerensa> so the bug is valid but the patch not?
[23:12] <micahg> the patch is a big hammer, where something smaller might be better (or more direct), ideally it should be a per-user preference like browser and other things, this should really be discussed in xubuntu-devel and I have to go :)
[23:13] <bkerensa> I will advise the submitted and ask if they would like to contribute a smaller hammer ;)
[23:14] <micahg> using the preferred applications dialog would be a good start, if the contributor would like to discuss options, #xubuntu-devel is the place